Blowing Up Darwin

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Quote Dawkins.

You can find it. It's when he describes himself as technically agnostic.

He says he is as agnostic about your god as he is fairies and leprechauns.

 

[Robert W]

You can find it. It's when he describes himself as technically agnostic.

He says he is as agnostic about your god as he is fairies and leprechauns.

Well, clearly you refuse to quote him. I own a god? Will you prove that?

 

[Hollie]

Got any examples?

The science loathing loon in this thread who posted a Dawkins youtube video,

 

[Hollie]

Keep tryin sweetheart, but remember you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time

It's funny when your feelings are hurt and you lash out like a petulant child.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Curious you get your science information from a talk show host.

You also troll the supermarket checkout lines for science journals such as the Star Magazine tabloid, right?

Actually, to prove your religion of hatred is false, I simply quote Darwin:


Darwin's theory is based on two ideas, the twin pillars of his theory:

a. universal common ancestry of all living things, all had a single common ancestor way back in the distant past..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)

and

b..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)



"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302

“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”ch.6

. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”

Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

“The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



Must I must admit that I enjoy your discomfort.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You are so desperate you're reduced to cutting and pasting multiple instances of the same nonsense to spam your thread.

What a laughable joke.

He wrote:

"Darwin did not offer to explain life on earth.”


Nothing could be more erroneous.


Is it your position as well?


What is your explanation for the variety of life on earth?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your attention seeking spam is a waste of time and off topic.

I hear the sound of you grinding your teeth.

I am not the only one to get under your scales.

Seems our pal Sherlock can do it, too.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Another of the Gods of religioners, Dawkins.

You don't know who Dawkins is, do you.

You dunce.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nor has one created a star.

You're not making any progress.

So you are admitting that God created both the stars and life?

That's progress.

 

[Leo123]

Actually, to prove your religion of hatred is false, I simply quote Darwin:


Darwin's theory is based on two ideas, the twin pillars of his theory:

a. universal common ancestry of all living things, all had a single common ancestor way back in the distant past..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)

and

b..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)



"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302

“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”ch.6

. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”

Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

“The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



Must I must admit that I enjoy your discomfort.

Darwin has missing fossil problems.

 

[abu afak]

Darwin's theory is based on two ideas, the twin pillars of his theory:
a. universal common ancestry of all living things, all had a single common ancestor way back in the distant past..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)
b..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.) "THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302

“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”ch.6

. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”

Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

“The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



Must I must admit that I enjoy your discomfort.

There's no Source for these "QUOTES"
THEY ARE PLAGIARIZED FROM CREATIONIST WEBSITES BY JehovahsWitlessChic. THEY ARE NOT USED WILLY-NILLY ORDER (SHE NEVER READ ORIGIN OF THE SPECIES) THEY ARE USED DISHONESTLY BUT IN THE SAME SEQUENCE SHE POSTS THEM IN.
ERGO THERE SHOULD BE A LINK FOR THE ORDER AND MANNER THEY ARE USED IN/COPIED FROM.

There are lists ON SEVERAL SITES, often on a site PoliticalShlt uses alot
ie, "Evolution-News" published by ther Discovery Institute, a LYING-FOR-JESUS KWEATIONIST WEBSITE.

LINK?

`

 

[Robert W]

You can find it. It's when he describes himself as technically agnostic.

He says he is as agnostic about your god as he is fairies and leprechauns.

When you bring things up, please stay in the lane. Quote Darwin today.

 

[Robert W]

about your god

My god? Where is it?

 

[Hollie]

You don't know who Dawkins is, do you.

You dunce.

Dunce. You have no idea who he is,

 

[Hollie]

I hear the sound of you grinding your teeth.

I am not the only one to get under your scales.

Seems our pal Sherlock can do it, too.

I'm reading more of your hurt feelings. Funny how the religious extremists are the most fragile and delicate.

 

[Hollie]

Darwin has missing fossil problems.

Religious extremists have missing gawds problems.

 

[Hollie]

Keep tryin sweetheart, but remember you can fool some of the people some of the time but you can't fool all of the people all of the time

Your usual cowardly retreat, pumpkin. You can be a fool all the time with your profound ignorance,

 

[Hollie]

Actually, to prove your religion of hatred is false, I simply quote Darwin:


Darwin's theory is based on two ideas, the twin pillars of his theory:

a. universal common ancestry of all living things, all had a single common ancestor way back in the distant past..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)

and

b..."all the organic beings that have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form" (Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.484.)



"THE ABRUPT manner in which whole groups of species suddenly appear in certain formations, has been urged by several palæontologists—for instance, by Agassiz, Pictet, and Sedgwick—as a fatal objection to the belief in the transmutation of species. If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory of evolution through natural selection." Darwin, "On The Origin of Species," p.302

“Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.”ch.6

. To the question why we do not find records of these vast primordial periods, I can give no satisfactory answer.”

Darwin, "On The Origin of Speices," chapter nine

“The case at present must remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views here entertained.”



Must I must admit that I enjoy your discomfort.

I must admit I find it hilarious that religious extremists are so threatened by science that it causes them to have emotional meltdowns at the mere notion that you are as frail and meaningless as your gods.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well, clearly you refuse to quote him. I own a god? Will you prove that?

Are you new to English? Seems like it. You're kind of embarrassing yourself.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When you bring things up, please stay in the lane. Quote Darwin today.

No, you can look it up, if you're curious.

Suffice it to say he is as agnostic about your god as he is fairies and leprechauns.

But technically agnostic, all the same.

An agnostic atheist.