JGalt
Diamond Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 78,064
- 100,112
- 3,635
Charles Darwin was a plagiarist, an ignorant psychotic product of incest, a sadist, a racist, a male supremacist, and did not repent before he died.
âOrigins of speciesâ â the plagiarist
"Contrary to common belief, Darwin was not intellectually capable of actual scientific research. All the ideas he had for his theory on evil lotion were actually recycled from other scholars including his own relatives.
This signifies that the theory was 1) not his own and 2) as it was stolen, it is conceivable that Mr. Darwin NEVER actually understood his âobservationsâ.
Darwin: a product of incest
"Three of Darwinâs 10 children died in childhood, while another three never had any children of their own, despite being married for years. A study of the scientistâs family tree suggests inbreeding was to blame, with frequent cousin to cousin marriages lowering immunity to disease and raising the odds of infertility. Darwinâs mother, Susannah, was the daughter of third cousins, one of which was Josiah Wedgwood, the founder of the pottery dynasty of the same name. Darwinâs wife, Emma Wedgwood, was his first cousin, while the Wedgwood family tree contained several other marriages between cousins."
The missing link? No! Missing education
Mr. Darwin was not a biologist. He studied theology, some geology and very little actual biology. Still, he was chosen to be the naturalist in the HMS Beagle collecting samples of organisms from South America and the infamous Galapagos islets. Thus, he was NOT QUALIFIED for any type of research, he NEVER got a PhD. Of course, this is no surprise based on the retardation as a result of the family incest.
The psychosis of Mr. Darwin
Based on this, it is clear that the ideas regarding evolution were based on hallucinations and not on actual observations. In plain language, the man was crazy. He should have been institutionalized.
Darwin the sadist killer
The incestuous retard + the lunatic = a sadistic murderer. Again, there is actual PROOF of this. Darwin enjoyed torturing and killing Godâs lesser creatures. While hunting is, of course, a highly respectable hobby for a heterosexual persecuted Caucasian Godly male, it should not be associated with sexual pleasure. That is was Mr. Darwin did. He was actually aroused while killing and shooting. This means that his sexual impulses were targeted at death, penetration, thrusting objects into animal bodies not via the natural orifices.
Darwin the racist
Mr. Darwin was a firm believer in his evil lotion, thus, he supported the notion that some human beings (Hamites) were lower on the scale of progress and closer to animals.
Darwin considered some nations to be âmissing linksâ between animals and humans as evidenced by some of the images he produced.
Darwin â the first Nazi
Inevitably, racism led the way to Nazism. In fact, we can without any reasonable doubt claim that Mr. Darwin was the first Nazi, the founding father of fascism and probably a good personal friend of not only Satan but also of Hitlerâs family!
Darwin the male supremacist
Darwin concluded that adult females of most species resembled the young of both sexes and from this and the other evidence, âreasoned that males are more evolutionarily advanced than femalesâ. Many anthropologists contemporary to Darwin concluded that âwomenâs brains were analogous to those of animals,â which had âoverdevelopedâ sense organs âto the detriment of the brainâ.
Did Darwin repent?
He did not. Unfortunately. This fact is verified by Creation Scientists of very high quality.
This is an often-told story but it does not seem to be true.
Charles Darwin â an inbred sadist psychotic plagiarist racist retard! | Landover Baptist Church
âOrigins of speciesâ â the plagiarist
"Contrary to common belief, Darwin was not intellectually capable of actual scientific research. All the ideas he had for his theory on evil lotion were actually recycled from other scholars including his own relatives.
Good evidence now exists to show that Darwin âborrowedââand in some cases plagiarizedâall or most of his âdear childâ from other researchers, especially his grandfather. They were not âhis own brainchildâ, nor his child, but that of others which he appropriated, evidently often without giving them proper credit.
This signifies that the theory was 1) not his own and 2) as it was stolen, it is conceivable that Mr. Darwin NEVER actually understood his âobservationsâ.
Darwin: a product of incest
"Three of Darwinâs 10 children died in childhood, while another three never had any children of their own, despite being married for years. A study of the scientistâs family tree suggests inbreeding was to blame, with frequent cousin to cousin marriages lowering immunity to disease and raising the odds of infertility. Darwinâs mother, Susannah, was the daughter of third cousins, one of which was Josiah Wedgwood, the founder of the pottery dynasty of the same name. Darwinâs wife, Emma Wedgwood, was his first cousin, while the Wedgwood family tree contained several other marriages between cousins."
The missing link? No! Missing education
Mr. Darwin was not a biologist. He studied theology, some geology and very little actual biology. Still, he was chosen to be the naturalist in the HMS Beagle collecting samples of organisms from South America and the infamous Galapagos islets. Thus, he was NOT QUALIFIED for any type of research, he NEVER got a PhD. Of course, this is no surprise based on the retardation as a result of the family incest.
Charles Darwin went to the University of Cambridge to study to be an Anglican priest. Following the earlier failure, his father wished him to become a Clergyman and he was enrolled for a general B.A. degree which included some study of theology and mathematics. He graduated from Cambridge with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1831. However, it would be beyond the scope of such a general degree to have furnished Darwin with any truly in-depth theological acumen and knowledge. So Charlesâ intention was to become a country parish priest, possibly believing that the life of a country priest, with a large house, a nice stipend, and generally little to do would be pretty secure.
The psychosis of Mr. Darwin
Darwinâs many psychological or psychologically influenced physical health symptoms included severe depression, insomnia, hysterical crying, dying sensations, shaking, fainting spells, muscle twitches, shortness of breath, trembling, nausea, vomiting, severe anxiety, depersonalization, seeing spots, treading on air and vision, and other visual hallucinations⌠The physical symptoms included headaches, cardiac palpitations, ringing in ears (possibly tinnitus), painful flatulence, and gastric upsetsâall of which commonly have a psychological origin⌠Some speculate that part of Darwinâs mental problems were due to his nagging, gnawing fear that he had devoted his âlife to a fantasyâ⌠This fear was that his theory was false and there was, in fact, a divine Creator.
Based on this, it is clear that the ideas regarding evolution were based on hallucinations and not on actual observations. In plain language, the man was crazy. He should have been institutionalized.
Darwin the sadist killer
The incestuous retard + the lunatic = a sadistic murderer. Again, there is actual PROOF of this. Darwin enjoyed torturing and killing Godâs lesser creatures. While hunting is, of course, a highly respectable hobby for a heterosexual persecuted Caucasian Godly male, it should not be associated with sexual pleasure. That is was Mr. Darwin did. He was actually aroused while killing and shooting. This means that his sexual impulses were targeted at death, penetration, thrusting objects into animal bodies not via the natural orifices.
How well I remember killing my first snipe, and my excitement was so great that I had much difficulty in reloading my gun from the trembling of my hands. This taste long continued and I became a very good shotâŚ
Darwin the racist
Mr. Darwin was a firm believer in his evil lotion, thus, he supported the notion that some human beings (Hamites) were lower on the scale of progress and closer to animals.
Darwin classified his own white race as more advanced than those âlower organismsâ such as pygmies, and he called different people groups âsavage,â âlow,â and âdegraded.â ⌠Even evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould wrote, âBiological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theoryâ
Darwin considered some nations to be âmissing linksâ between animals and humans as evidenced by some of the images he produced.
Darwin â the first Nazi
Inevitably, racism led the way to Nazism. In fact, we can without any reasonable doubt claim that Mr. Darwin was the first Nazi, the founding father of fascism and probably a good personal friend of not only Satan but also of Hitlerâs family!
Hitler elaborated his Darwinian views by comparing the strong killing the weak to a cat devouring a mouse, concluding that ultimately the Jews must be eliminated.
Darwin the male supremacist
Darwin concluded that adult females of most species resembled the young of both sexes and from this and the other evidence, âreasoned that males are more evolutionarily advanced than femalesâ. Many anthropologists contemporary to Darwin concluded that âwomenâs brains were analogous to those of animals,â which had âoverdevelopedâ sense organs âto the detriment of the brainâ.
Did Darwin repent?
He did not. Unfortunately. This fact is verified by Creation Scientists of very high quality.
âŚthere are many inconsistencies that make the story untenable⌠He [Mr. Darwin] was certainly not bedridden for six months before his death. Further, there was nothing to indicate that he was always studying the Bible.
This is an often-told story but it does not seem to be true.
Charles Darwin â an inbred sadist psychotic plagiarist racist retard! | Landover Baptist Church
Last edited by a moderator: