BLOCKBUSTER! Syrian Rebels Take Responsibility For Chemical Attack...

Source of this info is:

Respected 20 year Middle Eastern reporter and Associated Press, BBC and NPR correspondent Dale Gavrak was told by Syrian rebels that they were responsible for last week's chemical weapons incident in Ghouta.

Will the mainstream media ignore a story that could derail the march to war?


[youtube]iz0TxVmq3-Q[/youtube]

Yep.
 
Now we wait for the moment.

Yea, in horror and disbelief. :eusa_hand:

I think our President should first bomb them with his Peace Prize.

Meanwhile thousands are dying in Africa with the US doing nothing.

I may be jaded but I have a hard time taking the CIA by their word considering they didn't give us actionable intelligence of 9/11.

I was going to ask yesterday if we can just about now demand he give the Peace Prize back, but I'm glad I didn't, since that was rich.
 
Source of this info is:

Respected 20 year Middle Eastern reporter and Associated Press, BBC and NPR correspondent Dale Gavrak was told by Syrian rebels that they were responsible for last week's chemical weapons incident in Ghouta.

Will the mainstream media ignore a story that could derail the march to war?


[youtube]iz0TxVmq3-Q[/youtube]

Yes, many on this thread have chosen to go the old 'Shoot the Messenger' route. They've attempted to discredit this very well-respected reporter. If you don't buy into the American Government/Media Complex story, you're a bad person only worthy of endless ridicule and scorn. I'm very disappointed in Americans these days. Most have lost their critical thinking ability.
 
Why can't the reporter provide corroborating evidence?
 
Source of this info is:

Respected 20 year Middle Eastern reporter and Associated Press, BBC and NPR correspondent Dale Gavrak was told by Syrian rebels that they were responsible for last week's chemical weapons incident in Ghouta.

Will the mainstream media ignore a story that could derail the march to war?

Yes, many on this thread have chosen to go the old 'Shoot the Messenger' route. They've attempted to discredit this very well-respected reporter. If you don't buy into the American Government/Media Complex story, you're a bad person only worthy of endless ridicule and scorn. I'm very disappointed in Americans these days. Most have lost their critical thinking ability.

Funny thing. I googled this "well respected 20 year ME reporter" and all I found were links and references to this story. Pages and pages. Looks like the narco-libtard anti-anti-terrorists are in full dissemble mode.
 
Source of this info is:

Respected 20 year Middle Eastern reporter and Associated Press, BBC and NPR correspondent Dale Gavrak was told by Syrian rebels that they were responsible for last week's chemical weapons incident in Ghouta.

Will the mainstream media ignore a story that could derail the march to war?

Yes, many on this thread have chosen to go the old 'Shoot the Messenger' route. They've attempted to discredit this very well-respected reporter. If you don't buy into the American Government/Media Complex story, you're a bad person only worthy of endless ridicule and scorn. I'm very disappointed in Americans these days. Most have lost their critical thinking ability.

Funny thing. I googled this "well respected 20 year ME reporter" and all I found were links and references to this story. Pages and pages. Looks like the narco-libtard anti-anti-terrorists are in full dissemble mode.

Don't blame your inability to before research on "narco-libtards", retard.

Not that this report even matters. The UN already determined it was the rebels that used chem weapons in April. Effectively nullifying anything Assad my have done when it comes to this situation. It has nothing to do with chem weapon use and everything to do with the PNAC.

You're welcome.
 
Yes, many on this thread have chosen to go the old 'Shoot the Messenger' route. They've attempted to discredit this very well-respected reporter. If you don't buy into the American Government/Media Complex story, you're a bad person only worthy of endless ridicule and scorn. I'm very disappointed in Americans these days. Most have lost their critical thinking ability.

Funny thing. I googled this "well respected 20 year ME reporter" and all I found were links and references to this story. Pages and pages. Looks like the narco-libtard anti-anti-terrorists are in full dissemble mode.

Don't blame your inability to before research on "narco-libtards", retard.

Not that this report even matters. The UN already determined it was the rebels that used chem weapons in April. Effectively nullifying anything Assad my have done when it comes to this situation. It has nothing to do with chem weapon use and everything to do with the PNAC.

You're welcome.
Thanks for confirming my suspicion. Links to anything you say? Or is it just known because it came out of the ass of Ron Paul?
 
Yes, many on this thread have chosen to go the old 'Shoot the Messenger' route. They've attempted to discredit this very well-respected reporter. If you don't buy into the American Government/Media Complex story, you're a bad person only worthy of endless ridicule and scorn. I'm very disappointed in Americans these days. Most have lost their critical thinking ability.

Funny thing. I googled this "well respected 20 year ME reporter" and all I found were links and references to this story. Pages and pages. Looks like the narco-libtard anti-anti-terrorists are in full dissemble mode.

Don't blame your inability to before research on "narco-libtards", retard.

Not that this report even matters. The UN already determined it was the rebels that used chem weapons in April. Effectively nullifying anything Assad my have done when it comes to this situation. It has nothing to do with chem weapon use and everything to do with the PNAC. You're welcome.

That is a poor jump from April to August, TASB, in logic. A shoots B in April, so if C is shot in August, it can't be somebody other than A. The evidence available clearly indicts the regime.
 
Funny thing. I googled this "well respected 20 year ME reporter" and all I found were links and references to this story. Pages and pages. Looks like the narco-libtard anti-anti-terrorists are in full dissemble mode.

His name is Dale Gavlak, it was misspelled.

.

It's apparently a "her".

Yep. Didn't know Muslims have pale faces and blue eyes.

Dale_Gavlak_GRN.jpg


.
 
Last edited:
Yes, many on this thread have chosen to go the old 'Shoot the Messenger' route. They've attempted to discredit this very well-respected reporter. If you don't buy into the American Government/Media Complex story, you're a bad person only worthy of endless ridicule and scorn. I'm very disappointed in Americans these days. Most have lost their critical thinking ability.

Funny thing. I googled this "well respected 20 year ME reporter" and all I found were links and references to this story. Pages and pages. Looks like the narco-libtard anti-anti-terrorists are in full dissemble mode.

Don't blame your inability to before research on "narco-libtards", retard.

Not that this report even matters. The UN already determined it was the rebels that used chem weapons in April. Effectively nullifying anything Assad my have done when it comes to this situation. It has nothing to do with chem weapon use and everything to do with the PNAC.

You're welcome.

Yes. Regardless of what the UN says, i will not support this War. There is no justification for our involvement.
 
15th post
Why can't the reporter provide corroborating evidence?

Somehow, i doubt you would believe her even if she did. Whata you think?
The Rabbi is correct: corroborating evidence is essential to your conclusion, Paulitician.

If it were solid empirical data that pointed right at the rebels, I would believe they used it.

It will take corroborative evidence to show that the regime did not use gas munitions, and we have not been given that yet, have we?
 
Last edited:
Why can't the reporter provide corroborating evidence?

Somehow, i doubt you would believe her even if she did. Whata you think?

So you think it is a waste providing corroborating evidence? What planet are you from? Oh yeaj, Planet Narco-Libtard. All Opinion, Fact Free.

Yes we know, your spoon-fed Anderson Cooper-Government/Media Complex 'information' is the only information you can accept. But guess what? There's a big World out there. There are countless new sources for information. You don't have to swallow all the American Government/Media Complex shit being shoved down your gullet. Seriously, you don't have to.
 
Somehow, i doubt you would believe her even if she did. Whata you think?

So you think it is a waste providing corroborating evidence? What planet are you from? Oh yeaj, Planet Narco-Libtard. All Opinion, Fact Free.

Yes we know, your spoon-fed Anderson Cooper-Government/Media Complex 'information' is the only information you can accept. But guess what? There's a big World out there. There are countless new sources for information. You don't have to swallow all the American Government/Media Complex shit being shoved down your gullet. Seriously, you don't have to.

In other words, you are suggesting that we ignore all the data, refuse to critically think, and be spoon fed only alternative "news" sources.

We are talking about the use of poison gas against civilians and, thus, missile intervention here, paulitician, and I suggest we get all the information possible.
 
Why can't the reporter provide corroborating evidence?

Somehow, i doubt you would believe her even if she did. Whata you think?
The Rabbi is correct: corroborating evidence is essential to your conclusion, Paulitician.

If it were solid empirical data that pointed right at the rebels, I would believe they used it.

It will take corroborative evidence to show that the regime did not use gas munitions, and we have not been given that yet, have we?

Jake----you can't prove that negative. How are you going to prove that someone didn't do something ?
 
Back
Top Bottom