Blinded by the Light

[ReinyDays]

So just take your word for it? No lab experiments linking 120PPM of CO2 to temperature, very odd

Sure there's experiments that should link 120 ppm to temperature change ... they just don't ... so logically, 120 ppm doesn't change temperature, but we can't prove that ... not with cheap $10 Walmart thermometers NOAA uses ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Sure there's experiments that should link 120 ppm to temperature change ... they just don't ... so logically, 120 ppm doesn't change temperature, but we can't prove that ... not with cheap $10 Walmart thermometers NOAA uses ...

I don't understand "Sure there's experiments that should link 120 ppm to temperature change ... they just don't ." Are there any experiments or not? If you can find one, please post it

 

[ReinyDays]

I don't understand "Sure there's experiments that should link 120 ppm to temperature change ... they just don't ." Are there any experiments or not? If you can find one, please post it

How hard is it to shine light on a gas? ... I don't have any scientific papers that say one way or the other ...

 

[ding]

I'll need a preview my friend, I don't have time for hybrid denialists.

Why is it that atheists are so allergic to science and shit?

 

[Donald H]

That's not what I said ... I said fairly simple math refutes catastrophic climate change ...

Has your theory been accepted and peer reviewed by mainstream science yet?

it's the nature of logarithms ...

Or are you just a religion biased nobody with an angry opinion?

 

[ReinyDays]

Has your theory been accepted and peer reviewed by mainstream science yet?

The theory comes from mainstream science ... it's derived from Planck's Radiation Law ... where does your theory come from? ...

Or are you just a religion biased nobody with an angry opinion?

I took a class ... how about yourself? ... any formal education in any science? ...

=====

... or do you just vomit back what you slurp down from the National Inquirer? ...

 

[Donald H]

The theory comes from mainstream science ... it's derived from Planck's Radiation Law ... where does your theory come from? ...



I took a class ... how about yourself? ... any formal education in any science? ...

=====

... or do you just vomit back what you slurp down from the National Inquirer? ...

But you theory is contrary to 98% of peer reviewed science! Who should we believe?
Are you a climate scientist or are you just another vulgar American denialist asshole?

 

[ding]

But you theory is contrary to 98% of peer reviewed science! Who should we believe?
Are you a climate scientist or are you just another vulgar American denialist asshole?

You should believe the geologic record which shows a planet which transitioned from a greenhouse state to an icehouse state.

 

[ReinyDays]

But you theory is contrary to 98% of peer reviewed science! Who should we believe?
Are you a climate scientist or are you just another vulgar American denialist asshole?

You didn't say what science classes you've taken ... apparently none ... you believe without thinking ...

You should believe Max Planck ... and the 100% peer-review literature that supports his theories ... I've a year of formal education in Atmospheric Science ... your mistake is ignoring convection ...

Stefan-Boltzmann Law: Describes how the Earth's emitted radiation changes with
temperature.The Stefan-Boltzmann Law is a critical concept in the study of global warming
and climate change. It describes how the power radiated by a black body, an idealized
physical object that absorbs all incident electromagnetic radiation, depends on its
temperature. This law is foundational for understanding the Earth's energy balance and the
role of greenhouse gases in global warming

-- Kumar, Rajesh; The Physical Science of Climate Change: Understanding Global Warming Dynamics; International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Applied Science; May 2022

It appears peer-reviewed science agrees with me ... I know where you got your number, and that 14-year-old child isn't a scientist ...

 

[Donald H]

You didn't say what science classes you've taken ... apparently none ... you believe without thinking ...

I don't try to outthink 98% of the experts on climate change. You can spend your time taking courses on denialism biut that's not going to make you peer believed and noticed as an authority.

You should believe Max Planck ... and the 100% peer-review literature that supports his theories ... I've a year of formal education in Atmospheric Science ... your mistake is ignoring convection ...

Did you earn a degree in denial in one year?
I don't ignore science but I don't have any degrees in science like you? (there's one in every box)

-- Kumar, Rajesh; The Physical Science of Climate Change: Understanding Global Warming Dynamics; International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Applied Science; May 2022

A denialist? With 98% against you, I can trot out 50 for every Rajesh.

It appears peer-reviewed science agrees with me ... I know where you got your number, and that 14-year-old child isn't a scientist ...

What can I say to calm you? I'm not claiming to be an expert with a degree in climate science.
I'm now only closer to believing that you know that the god won't allow climate to change! But I learned about a big fish and Jonah from you-all too.

 

[Donald H]

You should believe the geologic record which shows a planet which transitioned from a greenhouse state to an icehouse state.

View attachment 1100190

I'm not a climate expert my friend, so what am I supposed to believe when a leading denialist like Matthew gets caught lying?
At least you're not an expert!
Except being an expert on faith, which I've never doubted..

 

[ding]

I'm not a climate expert my friend, so what am I supposed to believe when a leading denialist like Matthew gets caught lying?
At least you're not an expert!
Except being an expert on faith, which I've never doubted..

Like I said before... believe the geologic record, dummy.

 

[ding]

I don't try to outthink 98%

The problem is you don't think at all.

 

[ReinyDays]

I can trot out 50 for every Rajesh.

Okay ... game on ...

Add on Mark Landsea, Max Planck, Wilhelm Wein, and Ludwig Boltzmann ... that's 250 ... trot on sucker ...

Irradiation is proportional to temperature raised to the fourth power ... refute that ...

 

[Donald H]

Like I said before... believe the geologic record, dummy.

It's not what you said that had been holding us back.

It's what you refused to say that's set us on a path to truth together. Remember your belief in Jonah and the big fish?

That's where Meriweather is.

 

[Donald H]

The problem is you don't think at all.

If you're back to climate science then you're mostly right. I'm not going to pretend I have Reiny's degree that he earned in his year of study. a B.D.

 

[ReinyDays]

The problem is you don't think at all.

He counts abstentions as "yes" votes ... what an idiot ...

 

[ding]

It's not what you said that had been holding us back.

It's what you refused to say that's set us on a path to truth together. Remember your belief in Jonah and the big fish?

That's where Meriweather is.

This is a science discussion. You know even less about science than you do about religion and you don't know anything about religion.

 

[ReinyDays]

If you're back to climate science then you're mostly right. I'm not going to pretend I have Reiny's degree that he earned in his year of study. a B.D.

It helps if you know how to calculate work performed ... Physics 101 ...

 

[ding]

He counts abstentions as "yes" votes ... what an idiot ...

He's a troll. The problem is he's not even a very good troll, so he's rather boring AF.