Blinded by the Light

[abu afak]

Some "light" ... and Heat.

`


`

 

[Hellokitty]

 

[Billy_Bob]

The authors advised "extreme caution" when using these results ... did you read that part in the conclusions? ... or did you just read the abstract? ...

As you are totally ignorant on this subject, attached is a bit more information and complex answers in long term changes in solar output. This is an older paper but one that shows how much shift in the varying bandwidths which occur on the sun routinely. The shifts directly correlate to warming and cooling of the earths surface and oceans.

You refuse to let go of the CAGW dogma. A scientist ceases to be a scientist when they hold on to dogma rather than the facts presented to them.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017EA000357

 

[Billy_Bob]

Some "light" ... and Heat.

`


`

Your still quoting adjusted data... Nothing ever changes with you. You're citing a 30-year average comparison that has no basis in reality. The range is arbitrary and thus bull shit!

 

[ReinyDays]

As you are totally ignorant on this subject, attached is a bit more information and complex answers in long term changes in solar output. This is an older paper but one that shows how much shift in the varying bandwidths which occur on the sun routinely. The shifts directly correlate to warming and cooling of the earths surface and oceans.

You refuse to let go of the CAGW dogma. A scientist ceases to be a scientist when they hold on to dogma rather than the facts presented to them.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2017EA000357

Whoa ... I said your first citation doesn't support your claims ... and you have no rebuttal? ... just another citation that also supports my claim of 1,360 (±5) W/m^2 ... you have no answer for the math I posted? ... that's lazy ...

Yes, you do seem to be arguing with some ignorant strawman, I said SB refutes all claims of catastrophic climate change ... don't you understand what the math says? ... we have to increase irradiation by a huge amount in order to increase temperature by a little bit ... and one degree Celsius is tiny ... meteorologically speaking ...

 

[ReinyDays]

Your still quoting adjusted data... Nothing ever changes with you. You're citing a 30-year average comparison that has no basis in reality. The range is arbitrary and thus bull shit!

If we measure temperature "in the field" to the nearest whole degree ... then any and all averages calculated from this data is only accurate to the nearest whole degree ...

Thus ... all ten years show the same anomaly ... 1ºC over 20th Century average ... certainly below human perception, so why all the grief? ...

 

[abu afak]

Your still quoting adjusted data... Nothing ever changes with you. You're citing a 30-year average comparison that has no basis in reality. The range is arbitrary and thus bull shit!

Because you're low IQ you don't see the irony.
You posted an article that is Using NOAA's both estimates and "adjusted" numbers from 1000 years ago, but are complaining about their much more precise ability now.
:^)

Go back to SunsetMommy's 'Patriot' message board/denier trove.
`