Is It Really Our CO₂?

[Sunsettommy]

But he's a geologist ... why is he commenting on meteorology at all? ... he has no qualifications ... and yes, I checked his published papers, mostly about zicrons in Tibet ... {Cite} ... and from the link in the OP we get this self-description: "Earth science professor-in-exile, climate and cultural realist, political orphan, pluralist, husband, father, friend, optimist, Irrational Fear Substack" ... he only claims to be a climate realist, whatever that is ...

What was his mistake ... other than being unqualified to comment at all? ...

Now you emply the education fallacy, how pitiful of you as YOU don't have a science degree at all.

Cheers.

 

[toobfreak]

But he's a geologist ... why is he commenting on meteorology at all? ... he has no qualifications ... and yes, I checked his published papers, mostly about zicrons in Tibet ... {Cite} ... and from the link in the OP we get this self-description: "Earth science professor-in-exile, climate and cultural realist, political orphan, pluralist, husband, father, friend, optimist, Irrational Fear Substack" ... he only claims to be a climate realist, whatever that is ...

So basically, Reiny, it sounds like you want to discount the man's views by discounting the man? His views can be right even without being a professional in the field. Really, don't you think it possible for an earth scientist to have understandings of the Earth beyond the one particular, exact field that he is chosen to be accredited/licensed to practice in?

That is like saying a race car engine mechanic can have no valid opinion of tires because he's not the guy who changes or makes them.

Would you be discrediting the man's views if he AGREED with you???

 

[Sunsettommy]

So basically, Reiny, it sounds like you want to discount the man's views by discounting the man? His views can be right even without being a professional in the field. Really, don't you think it possible for an earth scientist to have understandings of the Earth beyond the one particular, exact field that he is chosen to be accredited/licensed to practice in?

That is like saying a race car engine mechanic can have no valid opinion of tires because he's not the guy who changes or makes them.

Would you be discrediting the man's views if he AGREED with you???

He thinks he is a Geologist but he has a Ph.D. in earth science which is comical that he got the wrong profession in his strange attacks on him.

I agree that while a science education is good to have it doesn't automatically make them right on everything. This man admitted he was wrong and has adjusted to a better understanding of it over time that is in my view a good sign to see unfold.

I have a paid subscription so I can see the science part of his article which I consider to be consistently good and based on real data.

 

[toobfreak]

I agree that while a science education is good to have it doesn't automatically make them right on everything.

Some of the most wrong people in this world have had degrees in and are experts in their fields.

The beauty of good data is that from it, people can either draw the most right or the most wrong conclusions out of it!

Look at me, I have zero formal training in either earth science, geology, climatology nor meteorology, yet I appear to usually be right on more related things while many in these fields seem often consistently wrong.

The skill in good science is in the correct interpretation of the evidence set before you.

 

[ReinyDays]

He thought the oceans would be boiling by now ...

Boys, this is called "appealing to authority" ... and it's a logical fallacy ... sure, he's a world class expert in Hadean zicrons, that doesn't mean he has any expertise in fluid dynamics ... I don't suppose any of you have read any of his papers, now have you ... he's a geologist according to the scientific media ...

Don't bother ... buy his book instead ...

 

[Sunsettommy]

He thought the oceans would be boiling by now ...

Boys, this is called "appealing to authority" ... and it's a logical fallacy ... sure, he's a world class expert in Hadean zicrons, that doesn't mean he has any expertise in fluid dynamics ... I don't suppose any of you have read any of his papers, now have you ... he's a geologist according to the scientific media ...

Don't bother ... buy his book instead ...

You still haven't showed he is a Geologist while I posted what he said about his own education.

He never said anything about oceans are boiling.....

 

[EMH]

Yes, some of it. The correlation between temperature and atmospheric CO2 is broken.
View attachment 1198418

Data completely refutes that, satellites balloons and Surface Air Pressure.

 

[EMH]

Look.
They are transitioning your rodent brains away from this useless horseshit.
Why?
AI and these data centers are poppin up like mushrooms.
Big power is in our master's best interests.
Have you noticed how cool and trendy Nuke power has suddenly become?

What’s next for nuclear power

Global shifts, advancing tech, and data center demand: Here’s what’s coming in 2025 and beyond.

www.technologyreview.com

Nuclear Energy Growth in the US: 5 Factors That Will Determine It

The interplay of economic viability, scalability, federal incentives, fuel, and public acceptance will ultimately determine whether nuclear energy can meet America's growing electricity demand. Learn more.

www.icf.com

Could CT have a nuclear energy future? Not if you’re in a rush

The owner of the one nuclear station in CT sees the challenges of building new nuclear here. If those could be overcome, it would be a long way off.

ctmirror.org

NUKE IS THE FUTURE----OUR MASTERS HAVE SPOKEN.

Another huge beneficiary of CO2 FRAUD, the nuclear industry.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Another huge beneficiary of CO2 FRAUD, the nuclear industry.

I love nuke power. Nuke the world!

Well, not Africa...good God, those idiots.

 

[ding]

Data completely refutes that, satellites balloons and Surface Air Pressure.

You clearly don't understand what this data is showing.

 

[EMH]

You clearly don't understand what this data is showing.
View attachment 1199103

FUDGE is not "data" it is FUDGE...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling."



Translation = for more than 3 decades of rising atmospheric CO2, the highly correlated satellite and balloon ACTUAL DATA showed precisely NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE before being FUDGED in 2005

 

[ding]

FUDGE is not "data" it is FUDGE...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling."



Translation = for more than 3 decades of rising atmospheric CO2, the highly correlated satellite and balloon ACTUAL DATA showed precisely NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE before being FUDGED in 2005

I just showed you the relevant data. It's not my fault you don't understand it.

 

[EMH]

I just showed you the relevant data. It's not my fault you don't understand it.

You did not, because your chart is FUDGE not data, and not understanding the difference between FUDGE and DATA is part of the idiocy required to fall for the claims of "warming."


Earth not warming.

Sincerely,

Surface Air Pressure

Thread 'Pluto and Surface Air Pressure'

Oct 22, 2024

Pluto: Facts - NASA Science

Why is Pluto no longer a planet? Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006 by the IAU because other objects might cross its orbit.

science.nasa.gov

Pluto has a thin, tenuous atmosphere that expands when it comes closer to the Sun and collapses as it moves farther away – similar to a comet. The main constituent is molecular nitrogen, though molecules of methane and carbon monoxide have also been detected.
When Pluto is close to the Sun, its surface ices sublimate (changing directly from solid to gas) and rise to temporarily form a thin atmosphere. Pluto's low gravity (about 6% of Earth's) causes the atmosphere to be much more extended in altitude than our planet's atmosphere...

• EMH
• Replies: 1,013
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

 

[ding]

You did not, because your chart is FUDGE not data, and not understanding the difference between FUDGE and DATA is part of the idiocy required to fall for the claims of "warming."


Earth not warming.

Sincerely,

Surface Air Pressure

Thread 'Pluto and Surface Air Pressure'

Oct 22, 2024

Pluto: Facts - NASA Science

Why is Pluto no longer a planet? Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet in 2006 by the IAU because other objects might cross its orbit.

science.nasa.gov

Pluto has a thin, tenuous atmosphere that expands when it comes closer to the Sun and collapses as it moves farther away – similar to a comet. The main constituent is molecular nitrogen, though molecules of methane and carbon monoxide have also been detected.
When Pluto is close to the Sun, its surface ices sublimate (changing directly from solid to gas) and rise to temporarily form a thin atmosphere. Pluto's low gravity (about 6% of Earth's) causes the atmosphere to be much more extended in altitude than our planet's atmosphere...

• EMH
• Replies: 1,013
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

You are chasing butterflies. You hurt opposition to AGW.

 

[EMH]

You are chasing butterflies. You hurt opposition to AGW.

You are part of CO2 FRAUD. Your "job" is to convince dumb Americans that Earth is warming, when there was never any evidence of that....

 

[ding]

You are part of CO2 FRAUD. Your "job" is to convince dumb Americans that Earth is warming, when there was never any evidence of that....

I think you are because you make opposition to AGW look bad with your idiotic assertions.

 

[EMH]

I think you are because you make opposition to AGW look bad with your idiotic assertions.

none of which you can refute at all...

 

[ding]

none of which you can refute at all...

You are a moron.