Is It Really Our CO₂?

[justoffal]

What is the "data" on atmospheric CO2 15 million years ago??

Well it's very old for one thing.

 

[EMH]

Well it's very old for one thing.

Do they even have "data?"

A lot of their claims have absolutely NO DATA...

 

[justoffal]

What an idiot ... why should I read anymore? ... he admits to being easily fooled ... thank God he went into chemistry instead ...

The cool people all knew CO2's mass is too small to "reshape the atmosphere" ... what a laugher ... I'll bet this guy's been sniffin' O-18 ... that stuff causes brain damage ... there's your Suess Effect for ya ...

A glue boy chem-physicist?...lol
God ... What is it that colleges are turning out these days?

 

[justoffal]

Do they even have "data?"

A lot of their claims have absolutely NO DATA...

Every time you engage one of them in a serious conversation it quickly devolves into a pissing match of chemistry equations and calculus statements that are basically disconnected from the original question. It's the old dazzle them with bullshit tactic....

I introduced the idea almost two decades ago that the ocean temperatures are actually the controller of CO2 concentrations.... and nothing man did amounted to more than a mere pittance of that activity.. The atmosphere does not hinge on a knife's edge but it's far more resilient in it's static condition then they care to admit.

It was met with hostility immediately and always has been since but it is undeniably true.

 

[midcan5]

Reality is a tough topic for many but weather has changed - does it matter, soon we all will be gone and life will continue and debate will continue too. My advice, be good and enjoy this moment. ; )

 

[justoffal]

Reality is a tough topic for many but weather has changed - does it matter, soon we all will be gone and life will continue and debate will continue too. My advice, be good and enjoy this moment. ; )

Yep... The Earth and it's climate will be here millions of years after humans are gone.

 

[ReinyDays]

Reality is a tough topic for many but weather has changed - does it matter, soon we all will be gone and life will continue and debate will continue too. My advice, be good and enjoy this moment. ; )

The weather changed? ... oh my God ... has it been fifteen minutes already ... ha ha ha ha ha ha ...

 

[ding]

What is the "data" on atmospheric CO2 15 million years ago??

Boron 11 isotopes and alkenoid carbon isotopes.

 

[ding]

That is a part of it, but it isn't the cause of the ice, the position of land is.


There is a 100% correlation between land within 600 miles of an Earth pole and land being in ice age.

Good luck refuting that....

Thermal isolation of polar regions is a requirement for bipolar glaciation so land configuration plays a role in our present bipolar glaciated world.

 

[EMH]

Boron 11 isotopes and alkenoid carbon isotopes.

THERE YOU GO, another BS used of "isotopes" that cannot be trusted at all.

Same as the "temperature" readings from AA's ice cores.

All BULLSHIT.

 

[ding]

THERE YOU GO, another BS used of "isotopes" that cannot be trusted at all.

Same as the "temperature" readings from AA's ice cores.

All BULLSHIT.

It's just science.

 

[EMH]

Thermal isolation of polar regions is a requirement for bipolar glaciation so land configuration plays a role in our present bipolar glaciated world.

View attachment 1192052

That's complete BS too.

What is required for ice to form in either polar circle is land being within 600 miles of a pole. Since dung cannot refute that, the subject is changed with "big words" that are completely wrong.

Disprove 600 miles to the pole or accept it as the indisputable truth it has always been.

 

[EMH]

It's just science.

FRAUD is not science
FUDGING DATA is not science
PARROTING is not science

Global "warming" was NEVER ABOUT SCIENCE.

 

[ding]

That's complete BS too.

What is required for ice to form in either polar circle is land being within 600 miles of a pole. Since dung cannot refute that, the subject is changed with "big words" that are completely wrong.

Disprove 600 miles to the pole or accept it as the indisputable truth it has always been.

It's not. You are too stupid to understand it. You are a moron.

 

[EMH]

It's not. You are too stupid to understand it. You are a moron.

600 miles to the pole is irrefutable truth and CO2 FRAUD doesn't like it...

 

[ding]

600 miles to the pole is irrefutable truth and CO2 FRAUD doesn't like it...

You are a moron.

 

[Old Rocks]

don't volcano's spew Co2?

~S~

Yes, they do. And here is the USGS assessment of their contribution to the increase in CO2 in our atmosphere.

Volcanos​

The USGS provides a clear distinction between volcanic CO2 emissions and human activities. Volcanoes emit approximately 0.2 Gt (200 million tons) of CO2 annually, while human activities, including fossil fuel burning, cement production, and other sources, emit about 27 Gt (2.7 billion tons) of CO2 per year. This comparison shows that human activities release more than 130 times the amount of CO2 emitted by volcanoes. The USGS emphasizes that while volcanic CO2 is a significant part of the carbon cycle, it is far less than the total emissions from human activities.

USGS.gov+5

 

[Old Rocks]

1. CO2 does not matter since it is not warming the atmosphere
2. IPCC can never be trusted
3. there is a desire of CO2 FRAUD to claim wild variances of CO2 in the past with virtually no evidence to support the claim. For example, Jurassic, CO2 FRAUD tries to blame the warming during Jurassic on CO2, never mind no evidence.

Ah yes, every scientist in the world is working to fool po' wittle EMH.

 

[EMH]

Ah yes, every scientist in the world is working to fool po' wittle EMH.

and none of those "scientists" can answer 5 basic climate questions...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

 

[Concerned American]

don't volcano's spew Co2?

~S~

CO2 comes from a variety of sources. I think the argument becomes moot when the removal of 100s of thousands of acres of rain forest is taken into account. Each full grown tree removes approximately a ton of carbon every year from the atmosphere. I believe the democrats wouldn't need a war on fossil fuels or carbon taxes at all if a moratorium on rain forest removals were enacted world wide.