Your side in this countries politics, has created black hating people. And the number is growing, and honestly I can't fault them. You go see people screaming and chanting and smashing businesses, and saying defund the police.... and then act shocked as more examples like you list increase? Really?
I dont' have a side and for you to claim that a particular side is "creating" "black-hating people" means you're 1) delusion, 2) ignorant of your own history or 3) brainwashed. The black-hating people as you call them which we know as white racists have been here from the very beginning. From all appearances, God made them that way or they are mutants.
Your people wrote the following back in the 1800s. Now tell me again that black-hating people are being
created when it's evident that white racists have been hating black people for centuries:
A declaration of the causes which impel the State of Texas to secede from the Federal Union
"[snipped]
...Texas abandoned her separate national existence and consented to become one of the Confederated States
to promote her welfare, insure domestic tranquility [sic] and secure more substantially the blessings of peace and liberty to her people. She was received into the confederacy with her own constitution, under the guarantee of the federal constitution and the compact of annexation, that she should enjoy these blessings.
She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery--the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits--a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time. [snipped]
In all the non-slave-holding States, in violation of that good faith and comity which should exist between entirely distinct nations, the people have formed themselves into a great sectional party, now strong enough in numbers to control the affairs of each of those States,
based upon the unnatural feeling of hostility to these Southern States and their beneficent and patriarchal system of African slavery, proclaiming the debasing doctrine of the equality of all men, irrespective of race or color--a doctrine at war with nature, in opposition to the experience of mankind, and in violation of the plainest revelations of the Divine Law. [snipped]
We hold as undeniable truths that the governments of the various States, and of the confederacy itself,
were established exclusively by the white race, for themselves and their posterity; that the African race had no agency in their establishment; that they were rightfully held and regarded as an inferior and dependent race, and in that condition only could their existence in this country be rendered beneficial or tolerable.
That
in this free government all white men are and of right ought to be entitled to equal civil and political rights; that the servitude of the African race, as existing in these States, is mutually beneficial to both bond and free, and is abundantly authorized and justified by the experience of mankind, and the revealed will of the Almighty Creator, as recognized by all Christian nations; while the destruction of the existing relations between the two races, as advocated by our sectional enemies, would bring inevitable calamities upon both and desolation upon the fifteen slave-holding States. "
I dont' have a side and for you to claim that a particular side is "creating" "black-hating people" means you're 1) delusion, 2) ignorant of your own history or 3) brainwashed. The black-hating people as you call them which we know as white racists have been here from the very beginning. From all appearances, God made them that way or they are mutants.
Nothing you posted has anything to do with my claim, nor contradicts it.
The left-wing is creating black hating people. None of anything else you posted contradicts that.
Let us say that prior to 2020, that I was a black hating person. Did you create me? No.
But let us say that after 2020, where a group of protesters attack and break the bones of a business owner, in the name of Black Lives Matter... who was only trying to defend his own property....
View attachment 360836
What do you think that man thinks about Black people today?
What do you think his family thinks of Black people today?
What do you think many people who have seen this mangled and beaten man who was only trying to defend the business he's poured his life into, think of black people?
Look on this forum. Read the comments. Your side... the "anti-racists" side... had directly created black hating people.
I'm not suggesting that racism didn't exist until 2020. Of course it did. As long as there are two groups of people anywhere in the world, racism will always exist. Hutus and Tutsi killed each other, and they were both blacks, just a different group of people in a black country.
Doesn't matter. In 2007, before Obama was elected, racial tensions were the lowest in 50 some years. By Obama's second term, we had blacks targeting and killing police.
The left-wing race-baiting side, the side that you are effectively representing here whether you admit it or not.... has directly created racists people. Has created Black hating people.
That's not opinion. That is statistical fact.
I'm not representing any political party or ideology. But for some reason the white racists on this site seem to think that I should be more fair in what I post and give them more of a platform. WHY would I do that, when I am one of the people they constantly denigrate and refer to utilizing the most vulgar and debasing terms? What is wrong with you all that you think that you deserve anything other than what you're seeing now - all you're saying in your fancy terminology is that more white racists are being created in direct backlash to all of the things they have
always hated - seeing black people not knowing "our place", speaking back to them,, not deferring to them, speaking up for ourselves, refusing to do or behave how they think we should. But it seems to particularly you all when we are seen making social/economical progress, advancing in education and our careers, excelling in the workplace, gaining recognition, breaking barriers, etc. That's what pissing them off.
Nobody is
creating them, they're just letting their inner racist shine - coming on out of the closest, that's all that is happening.
You are just wrong.
And that argument is just plain stupid too. You are telling me, that if you met me randomly, that you hated me just from the start? Without any reason?
I doubt that. I think you, like most people only tend to have hatred for people, when they give you cause.
Well.... screaming at people that they are racists non-stop for years on end, would be a reason people might hate them back.
If you deny that, you are crazy.
I can remember exactly when I changed my views on race, and when I knew Trump would win. It was 2012.
Now I didn't know it would be Trump specifically, but I remember specifically in 2012, I would have conversations that went like "I disagree with Obama on (insert anything) raising the minimum wage" And people would respond back "That's because you are racist!".
Had that happen a dozen times. Completely innocent disagreements on policy, and it would end with "Well you are just racists against Obama!".
And I remember thinking... I don't think I give a crap about racism anymore. And then I realized if I feel this way, I but millions of people do. And very specifically I had the thought, this is going to come right back around on these people, because we're going to end up supporting someone who will just smack them around and mock them. Sure enough Trump came on the map, and every single time they accused him of racism and such, his poll numbers went up.
I was dead on right.
We longer care about your cries of racism. You don't matter to us, because you have screamed and yelled about racism so much...... we just don't care. You can stuff it.
And if it makes you feel better to pretend that accusing good decent people of being racism endlessly for years, that no no... you being scum to those around you didn't cause them to hate you... it was just some mythical "letting out their inner racism"... whatever jerk off. Whatever makes you feel better about yourself.
She is the racist here. She constantly accuses white people of being racist but is completely blind to her own.
Her brain is broken.
Surely you're not suggesting that your brain is superior to mine?
Of course it is, I'm not obsessed with imaginary shit like "systemic racism", for one thing.
Don't you all EVER get tired of being wrong? I just posted this earlier tonight. It is not MY opinion, it's a Supreme Court decision (see text highlighted in red below).
"
Supreme Court: Institutional Racism Is Real
Disparate Impact
In extending ‘disparate impact’ reasoning to housing cases, the court acknowledges that discrimination comes from more than just individual bad actors.

Jay Michaelson
Updated Apr. 14, 2017 10:34AM ET / Published Jun. 25, 2015 6:30PM ET
June 25 will be remembered as a crucial day for civil rights—not because of the
Obamacare decision, and not because of the not-yet-announced marriage decision. It’s because on Thursday the Supreme Court saved a crucial part of civil rights law.
You’d be forgiven for not knowing much about it. The principle, after all, is an obscure-sounding bit of legalese: “disparate impact.” But those words divided the court 5-4 on ideological lines, with
Justice Kennedy writing to preserve, but restrict, the doctrine.
Here’s why it matters.
Most cases of discrimination—whether against women, African Americans, LGBT people, or other protected groups—are rarely as clear as they are in the movies. In media portrayals, discrimination is about evil individuals who fire someone because of who they are. But in real life, there’s rarely a smoking gun.
First, racists are usually not dumb enough to leave records of their prejudice. They find some other reason to fire the employee, or keep the family out of the neighborhood.
Second, and more importantly, discrimination is often systemic and structural, not individual. Often, not only is there no smoking gun, but there’s often no individual “bad actor.” Even neutral requirements—a high-school diploma for employment, a family-size limit for housing—can have huge
de facto discriminatory effects, which may or may not be intentional.
That’s where “disparate impact” comes in. Under some civil rights laws, plaintiffs can prevail even without evidence of a specific discriminatory intention if they can show a disparate impact on the affected group."