jknowgood
Diamond Member
Blm is a terrorist organization that should be shutdown.
Black Lives Matter Exposed
- Thread starter Viktor
- Start date
Hellbilly
Platinum Member
I think you mean All White Lives Matter.
LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 26,441
- 16,882
- 1,405
Bullshit. There is enough white ANTIFA or white leftists that I have seen on video as well. Collectively, it is BLM and ANTIFA and their useful idiots that are sponsoring and executing the majority of the Burning, Looting, and Murdering. I don’t think it’s ****** the cameraman only showing Black violence. To your point, peaceful protesting doesn’t sell antacid but that does not mean selectively showing Black violence sells more.
Turtlesoup
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2020
- 15,903
- 16,743
- 2,288
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 44,494
- 27,651
- 2,615
All lives natter. Do you think police lives matter?
ReinyDays
Gold Member
Ah ... you must be the type of person that gets their news from a variety of sources, each with their point-of-view, and then synthesis your own opinion ... which is what all of us are supposed to be doing ... if this is true, then you should know perfectly well that some sources are racist ... and there's racist antacid manufacturers who are happily catering to the racist audience ...
Or do you think only cute white girls get kidnapped in the USA? ...
Big strong Black man kneels during the National Anthem ... it's a national disgrace ...
Cute white girl in an American Flag bikini ... 672 million "likes" on Facebook ...
That's racism ... institutional racism ...
From 4 USC Section 8:
Subsection (d) - "The flag should never be used as wearing apparel, bedding, or drapery. It should never be festooned, drawn back, nor up, in folds, but always allowed to fall free."
[Emphasis mine]
LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 26,441
- 16,882
- 1,405
I know that many of the sources are biased with a left leaning. If anything, most of the content would be showing all of these white racists instigating riots, looting, and violence.
HereWeGoAgain
Diamond Member
WTH_Progs?
Diamond Member
- Feb 19, 2019
- 12,229
- 10,373
- 2,140
When wasn't ANTIFA tiresome?
AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
I think black lives matter to every one, just not Black Lives Matter. To almost everyone all lives matter regardless of the color of their skin. To me a black person's life is no more important than that of a white person, a brown person, a red person or a yellow person. To say black lives matter is a racist position.
- Mar 31, 2009
- 106,958
- 90,551
- 3,605
No I said All Lives Matter, now sit your stupid ass down and never, ever try to think for me
Understand? I'll crucify your uneducated ass
Hellbilly
Platinum Member
Good luck. You’ll need it.
Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
A big strong black, white, Asian, Indian whatever does not do anything for me, a beautiful woman, not caring about race, in a bikini, flag or no flag would be fine by me.
No institutional racism, however it does sound like sexism.
Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,217
- 1,590
Elton
Gold Member
- Sep 27, 2018
- 377
- 430
- 195
Andy McCarthy
@AndrewCMcCarthy
·
Sep 6
It’s a Straight Line from Biden to BLM ... if you oppose the Left, your speech is incitement, as is your silence ... and, for that matter, your existence.
Exactly how are the Trump deplorables to blame? How are they instigating the violence that Biden now “unequivocally” condemns (after remaining largely mum, while his running mate, Senator Kamala Harris, was promoting a fund to bail out rioters)?
Why, by saying things that offend the Left’s hair-trigger sensibilities, that’s how.
If you are a conservative, a Republican, and/or a Trump supporter, you offend by backing candidates and policies the Left opposes. And don’t even think about doing it quietly because, it turns out, “silence is violence,” too — your very existence equates to offensive speech. There is only one way out for you: submission. You need to get with the program that capitalism is white supremacy, private property is colonialist exploitation, noticing the criminal records of criminals is racism, and supporting the arrest of those criminals when they forcibly resist is police brutality.
Wait a second, you’re thinking. Biden’s not with that program. He even says he’s no “radical socialist with a soft spot for rioters.” He’s a moderate, right?
Well, truth be told, he’s a hack. For half a century, he’s blown with the progressive gales, trying to stay on whatever seemed to be the popular side on a given day. In favor of using force in Iraq but against the Iraq war. For the “Russia Reset” after Moscow annexed parts of Georgia, but wannabe scourge of Russia after Moscow annexed parts of Ukraine. Back in 1994, he labored to brand tough Clinton crime legislation as the “Biden Bill”; now, with the Left decrying that law as the foundation of America’s racist “carceral state,” he’d prefer to forget the whole thing, and hopes you will, too.
@AndrewCMcCarthy
·
Sep 6
It’s a Straight Line from Biden to BLM ... if you oppose the Left, your speech is incitement, as is your silence ... and, for that matter, your existence.
Exactly how are the Trump deplorables to blame? How are they instigating the violence that Biden now “unequivocally” condemns (after remaining largely mum, while his running mate, Senator Kamala Harris, was promoting a fund to bail out rioters)?
Why, by saying things that offend the Left’s hair-trigger sensibilities, that’s how.
If you are a conservative, a Republican, and/or a Trump supporter, you offend by backing candidates and policies the Left opposes. And don’t even think about doing it quietly because, it turns out, “silence is violence,” too — your very existence equates to offensive speech. There is only one way out for you: submission. You need to get with the program that capitalism is white supremacy, private property is colonialist exploitation, noticing the criminal records of criminals is racism, and supporting the arrest of those criminals when they forcibly resist is police brutality.
Wait a second, you’re thinking. Biden’s not with that program. He even says he’s no “radical socialist with a soft spot for rioters.” He’s a moderate, right?
Well, truth be told, he’s a hack. For half a century, he’s blown with the progressive gales, trying to stay on whatever seemed to be the popular side on a given day. In favor of using force in Iraq but against the Iraq war. For the “Russia Reset” after Moscow annexed parts of Georgia, but wannabe scourge of Russia after Moscow annexed parts of Ukraine. Back in 1994, he labored to brand tough Clinton crime legislation as the “Biden Bill”; now, with the Left decrying that law as the foundation of America’s racist “carceral state,” he’d prefer to forget the whole thing, and hopes you will, too.
Biden supports the Left’s radical revision of the First Amendment, codified in the Obama-Biden administration-backed U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18. In a nutshell, it is the “heckler’s veto” — though would that the Left’s shock troops contented themselves with heckling.
Resolution 16/18 is a blatantly unconstitutional provision the Obama-Biden government pushed to support Islamist regimes. Ostensibly, it is about religious liberty. In reality, it is the Left’s template for speech suppression.
The trick is to turn the once simple concept of incitement on its head.
The resolution purports to render unlawful any speech about religion that “constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence.” Its transparent purpose is to insulate Islamic doctrine from critical examination, notwithstanding that fundamentalists unabashedly exploit scripture to justify and promote terrorism.
In the Soviet style, the Left sustains its program with a combination of fantasy, indoctrination, and suppression. American history, for example, becomes the 1619 Project — the republic as an enterprise to perpetuate slavery. The Big Lie is cemented by Pulitzer prizes, K–12 curricula, and reparations bills; it is protected by attaching the smear of racism to naysayers who dare show that the project is farcical.
www.nationalreview.com
Resolution 16/18 is a blatantly unconstitutional provision the Obama-Biden government pushed to support Islamist regimes. Ostensibly, it is about religious liberty. In reality, it is the Left’s template for speech suppression.
The trick is to turn the once simple concept of incitement on its head.
The resolution purports to render unlawful any speech about religion that “constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence.” Its transparent purpose is to insulate Islamic doctrine from critical examination, notwithstanding that fundamentalists unabashedly exploit scripture to justify and promote terrorism.
In the Soviet style, the Left sustains its program with a combination of fantasy, indoctrination, and suppression. American history, for example, becomes the 1619 Project — the republic as an enterprise to perpetuate slavery. The Big Lie is cemented by Pulitzer prizes, K–12 curricula, and reparations bills; it is protected by attaching the smear of racism to naysayers who dare show that the project is farcical.
It’s a Straight Line from Biden to BLM | National Review
Black Lives Matter is not a reaction to Donald Trump.
www.nationalreview.com
Progressives have created their own fantasy version of Islam. Its defining tenet — indeed, its only known tenet — is anti-violence. You are to see terrorism as innately un-Islamic activity. Any claim that scripture justifies violence — i.e., any reading of what belligerent scriptures unambiguously say — is angrily rebuked as a distortion of the “true” Islam. Jihad itself is transmogrified into an internal struggle to become a better person, not a doctrinal command to wage war for the purpose of establishing the dominion of sharia (Islam’s law and cultural norms).
This is fraud. Obviously, it is not necessary for Muslims to construe their scriptures as a command to holy war in modern times, and most do not. Literally, though, the doctrine says what it says. To a greater or lesser extent, then, a not insignificant percentage of Muslims accepts this sharia-supremacist interpretation of Islam, which is backed by centuries of fundamentalist scholarship. Common sense says this is why there is so much jihadist terrorism. It is why many Islamic societies still hew to a literalist interpretation of sharia standards, endorsing discrimination, repression, and cruel corporate punishments that seem barbaric by today’s sensibilities.
That is reality. To acknowledge it as such is not to call for violence against Muslims. It is to resist violence by understanding both why some Muslims are committing it and why reformist Muslims need our support in their courageous work. Dealing with reality head-on is what adults do. It is critical thinking. The objective is to solve difficult problems, not tell stories about them.
The Obama-Biden administration rejected this approach. Their substitute is a fantasy, peddled tirelessly and protected by shutting down all debate — indeed, by making their opposition’s position unutterable, not just by intimidation but by the force of law.
Our free-expression right should make this impossible. At issue here is political speech, the exchange of ideas in examining a threat, in order to develop sensible security policy. That’s the First Amendment’s core. There have always been exceptions to free speech, however, and they include incitement: speech intended to spur people to violence and other lawlessness.
This is fraud. Obviously, it is not necessary for Muslims to construe their scriptures as a command to holy war in modern times, and most do not. Literally, though, the doctrine says what it says. To a greater or lesser extent, then, a not insignificant percentage of Muslims accepts this sharia-supremacist interpretation of Islam, which is backed by centuries of fundamentalist scholarship. Common sense says this is why there is so much jihadist terrorism. It is why many Islamic societies still hew to a literalist interpretation of sharia standards, endorsing discrimination, repression, and cruel corporate punishments that seem barbaric by today’s sensibilities.
That is reality. To acknowledge it as such is not to call for violence against Muslims. It is to resist violence by understanding both why some Muslims are committing it and why reformist Muslims need our support in their courageous work. Dealing with reality head-on is what adults do. It is critical thinking. The objective is to solve difficult problems, not tell stories about them.
The Obama-Biden administration rejected this approach. Their substitute is a fantasy, peddled tirelessly and protected by shutting down all debate — indeed, by making their opposition’s position unutterable, not just by intimidation but by the force of law.
Our free-expression right should make this impossible. At issue here is political speech, the exchange of ideas in examining a threat, in order to develop sensible security policy. That’s the First Amendment’s core. There have always been exceptions to free speech, however, and they include incitement: speech intended to spur people to violence and other lawlessness.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
The Egypt wall with Gaza seems to be working. But supposedly “Walls Dont Work”- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
-
Cops Aren't Putting Up With Anything From Rioters- Started by mudwhistle
- Replies: 8
