Bill Maher: New Rules for Teabaggers

[Si modo]

Si will not look at anything. She just cries "logic", and then avoids that whenever possible.

If there is anything logical about debating something debated over a week ago, you let us all know, OldRocks.

Of course, it's very logical making me the topic of the thread, right old boy?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Si modo, once again, your opinion is not evidence. No one has to refute it, but just give his own opinion. Where you demonstrate your ignorance is when you give your opinion then demand that it be refuted. That's asinine.

 

[MarcATL]

This thread was an EPIC....

LOL!!!

 

[Ava]

Do you expect anything but hypocrisy from a guy who constantly tells us not to jump to conclusions but can then jump to a conclusion like "The police acted stupidly"?

No, I have learned the hard way from him, never to believe much less respect, anything he says or does. He is an enemy to traditional American values.

 

[Si modo]

Si modo, once again, your opinion is not evidence. No one has to refute it, but just give his own opinion. Where you demonstrate your ignorance is when you give your opinion then demand that it be refuted. That's asinine.

Okie Doke. Than, I'll change my opinion, m'kay?

I no longer think that anyone whining about the name teabagger is being ridiculous.

You and smith have convinced me to change my mind.

Kudos to you and smith.









Careful, knee jerks are not wise. Both of you are so dense that you've been arguing with one who USED to agree with you. You win and have changed my mind. Bravo.








What a couple of morons.

 

[JakeStarkey]

In other words, Si, you cannot critically think and have a fail here. Got that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And Si's latest action does prove a fail as well. Neg repping me for telling the truth means nothing to me, Si. Go for it. The point is that you literally are shallow, ignorant, illiterate, or a combination of them.

So, stop the whining, Si up and let's debate. Your opinion is not debate. Evidence is. Go for it. But I mean it, stop whining.

 

[drsmith1072]

Yeah, you've read the thread. That's why you came into it days after the debate was had and parroted the points of others and thinking even more days later that you have some earth-shattering pont to make.

I didn't parrot anything. I did read through the thread and respond to what I read as i read it and did my own research as I went. That is NOT parroting. The fact that a couple of my posts were similar but hardly the same to responses that came later in the thread and that I had not read yet is not parroting. In order to parrot it I would have had to read it FIRST then repeat it.
Furthermore, those FEW responses have NO bearing on the last one that you continue to claim was parroted while you cannot prove that it was. You claimed I parroted it, so I asked you to prove that i did and you ran away from doing so and have been running away from providing anything of substance ever since.

I am certain that you will keep running since it's obvious that you don't have the integrity to admit when you are wrong.

I love it! He said I am running, AGAIN!

Yes you are running and this is nothing but more of the same from you. You can't prove your claim that I parroted the argument in question which is why you continue to run away from even attempting to do so because you know that you can't and you still refuse to admit that you are WRONG.

 

[drsmith1072]

You are running, Si modo, until you prove Dr. parroted the statement. You can't, thus you fail.

Exactly. However, he tries to spin and claim that merely because he continues to post that he is not running despite the fact that he can't prove his claim and continues to avoid doing so.

 

[drsmith1072]

You are running, Si modo, until you prove Dr. parroted the statement. You can't, thus you fail.

Once again, I play the broken record. I've already done that - showing Smith as parroting others' points - days ago. Actually, Smith did a bang-up job himself of using the quote function to quote the points of others and making the same point. For those who don't read threads, they can take your and Smith's word that I haven't. That's fine by me.

Now, cue Smith to tell me I'm running away. It's a slow news week, just more lib whining about Arizona, so this is quite entertaining.

NO you have not "already done that" and the last time that you LIED and tried to claim that you had "already done that" i asked you to show the post in which you PROVED that I had and you failed to provide it.

You making a claim is NOT proof but thanks for the dishonest spin.

Fact is that you have been asked repeatedly to PROVE your claims and you have failed to do so on every occasion and NOW you are lying as you try to claim that you have proven your claims despite the fact that all you have done is repeated your false claims over and over while providing nothing to substantiate them.

Even IF I did parrot every single argument in this thread, which is not the case, it doesn't change the FACT that you were shown to be WRONG no matter who said it first. In the end all you have succeded at was avoidance and spin and as far as the argument goes you fail.

 

[Si modo]

You are running, Si modo, until you prove Dr. parroted the statement. You can't, thus you fail.

Once again, I play the broken record. I've already done that - showing Smith as parroting others' points - days ago. Actually, Smith did a bang-up job himself of using the quote function to quote the points of others and making the same point. For those who don't read threads, they can take your and Smith's word that I haven't. That's fine by me.

Now, cue Smith to tell me I'm running away. It's a slow news week, just more lib whining about Arizona, so this is quite entertaining.

NO you have not "already done that" and the last time that you LIED and tried to claim that you had "already done that" i asked you to show the post in which you PROVED that I had and you failed to provide it.

You making a claim is NOT proof but thanks for the dishonest spin.

Fact is that you have been asked repeatedly to PROVE your claims and you have failed to do so on every occasion and NOW you are lying as you try to claim that you have proven your claims despite the fact that all you have done is repeated your false claims over and over while providing nothing to substantiate them.

Even IF I did parrot every single argument in this thread, which is not the case, it doesn't change the FACT that you were shown to be WRONG no matter who said it first. In the end all you have succeded at was avoidance and spin and as far as the argument goes you fail.

Don't fret so much, Smith. You're successful in changing my mind. I no longer think that anyone who complains about the tea partiers being called teabaggers is ridiculous.

Good job.

 

[drsmith1072]

Si modo, once again, your opinion is not evidence. No one has to refute it, but just give his own opinion. Where you demonstrate your ignorance is when you give your opinion then demand that it be refuted. That's asinine.

Okie Doke. Than, I'll change my opinion, m'kay?

I no longer think that anyone whining about the name teabagger is being ridiculous.

You and smith have convinced me to change my mind.

Kudos to you and smith.


Careful, knee jerks are not wise. Both of you are so dense that you've been arguing with one who USED to agree with you. You win and have changed my mind. Bravo.


What a couple of morons.

Who is arguing with you over an agreed upon point?? Not me but nice failed attempt to change the subject. I am merely calling you out over the fact that you attacked ME and made claims about ME that you could NOT support with anything of substance.
What's truly sad is that even when shown to be WRONG and full of shite you still try to attack as if your baseless attacks and repetition are in some way a replacement for a valid argument when they are NOT.

 

[Si modo]

Si modo, once again, your opinion is not evidence. No one has to refute it, but just give his own opinion. Where you demonstrate your ignorance is when you give your opinion then demand that it be refuted. That's asinine.

Okie Doke. Than, I'll change my opinion, m'kay?

I no longer think that anyone whining about the name teabagger is being ridiculous.

You and smith have convinced me to change my mind.

Kudos to you and smith.


Careful, knee jerks are not wise. Both of you are so dense that you've been arguing with one who USED to agree with you. You win and have changed my mind. Bravo.


What a couple of morons.

Who is arguing with you over an agreed upon point?? Not me but nice failed attempt to change the subject. I am merely calling you out over the fact that you attacked ME and made claims about ME that you could NOT support with anything of substance.
What's truly sad is that even when shown to be WRONG and full of shite you still try to attack as if your baseless attacks and repetition are in some way a replacement for a valid argument when they are NOT.

Still fretting?

Nope, don't you worry your pretty little head, there smith. You've changed my mind with all your parroting of points made two weeks ago. I no longer think that those who complain about the term teabagger are being ridiculous.

 

[drsmith1072]

Okie Doke. Than, I'll change my opinion, m'kay?

I no longer think that anyone whining about the name teabagger is being ridiculous.

You and smith have convinced me to change my mind.

Kudos to you and smith.


Careful, knee jerks are not wise. Both of you are so dense that you've been arguing with one who USED to agree with you. You win and have changed my mind. Bravo.


What a couple of morons.

Who is arguing with you over an agreed upon point?? Not me but nice failed attempt to change the subject. I am merely calling you out over the fact that you attacked ME and made claims about ME that you could NOT support with anything of substance.
What's truly sad is that even when shown to be WRONG and full of shite you still try to attack as if your baseless attacks and repetition are in some way a replacement for a valid argument when they are NOT.

Still fretting?

Nope, don't you worry your pretty little head, there smith. You've changed my mind with all your parroting of points made two weeks ago. I no longer think that those who complain about the term teabagger are being ridiculous.

WOW more of your usual baseless attacks. The sad thing is that you are now flip flopping AGAIN. You argued that same spiel to begin with and then after being shown you were wrong you flipped and said,

This is why I like reasonable arguments - folks using links, sources, etc - rather than just flames. It opens my mind.

From this point forward, I believe that any whining about the term teabagger is ridiculous.

(see how EASY it is to quote a post?)

and now you have flipped AGAIN showing that you have zero credibility to

I no longer think that those who complain about the term teabagger are being ridiculous

LOL the other sad thing is that in the post I quoted you talked about "This is why I like reasonable arguments - folks using links, sources, etc - rather than just flames." when all you TRY to do is flame. However, you are an attack dog that barks A LOT but has no bite as you make the same baseless accusation over and over again.

BTW I am still waiting on you to PROVE your claim that I parroted that last timeline argument. You made the claim and have ran away from proving it because you know that you can't. However, go ahead and attack me with your lies again. Please, continue to show how your attempt at flaming me is all that you have to offer. LOL

 

[Si modo]

Who is arguing with you over an agreed upon point?? Not me but nice failed attempt to change the subject. I am merely calling you out over the fact that you attacked ME and made claims about ME that you could NOT support with anything of substance.
What's truly sad is that even when shown to be WRONG and full of shite you still try to attack as if your baseless attacks and repetition are in some way a replacement for a valid argument when they are NOT.

Still fretting?

Nope, don't you worry your pretty little head, there smith. You've changed my mind with all your parroting of points made two weeks ago. I no longer think that those who complain about the term teabagger are being ridiculous.

WOW more of your usual baseless attacks. The sad thing is that you are now flip flopping AGAIN. You argued that same spiel to begin with and then after being shown you were wrong you flipped and said,

This is why I like reasonable arguments - folks using links, sources, etc - rather than just flames. It opens my mind.

From this point forward, I believe that any whining about the term teabagger is ridiculous.

(see how EASY it is to quote a post?)

and now you have flipped AGAIN showing that you have zero credibility to

I no longer think that those who complain about the term teabagger are being ridiculous

LOL the other sad thing is that in the post I quoted you talked about "This is why I like reasonable arguments - folks using links, sources, etc - rather than just flames." when all you TRY to do is flame. However, you are an attack dog that barks A LOT but has no bite as you make the same baseless accusation over and over again.

BTW I am still waiting on you to PROVE your claim that I parroted that last timeline argument. You made the claim and have ran away from proving it because you know that you can't. However, go ahead and attack me with your lies again. Please, continue to show how your attempt at flaming me is all that you have to offer. LOL

LMAO! Like clockwork.

Idiot.

 

[geauxtohell]

Unsubscribing time..... now.

 

[drsmith1072]

Still fretting?

Nope, don't you worry your pretty little head, there smith. You've changed my mind with all your parroting of points made two weeks ago. I no longer think that those who complain about the term teabagger are being ridiculous.

WOW more of your usual baseless attacks. The sad thing is that you are now flip flopping AGAIN. You argued that same spiel to begin with and then after being shown you were wrong you flipped and said,

(see how EASY it is to quote a post?)

and now you have flipped AGAIN showing that you have zero credibility to

I no longer think that those who complain about the term teabagger are being ridiculous

LOL the other sad thing is that in the post I quoted you talked about "This is why I like reasonable arguments - folks using links, sources, etc - rather than just flames." when all you TRY to do is flame. However, you are an attack dog that barks A LOT but has no bite as you make the same baseless accusation over and over again.

BTW I am still waiting on you to PROVE your claim that I parroted that last timeline argument. You made the claim and have ran away from proving it because you know that you can't. However, go ahead and attack me with your lies again. Please, continue to show how your attempt at flaming me is all that you have to offer. LOL

LMAO! Like clockwork.

Idiot.

Yes you are like clockwork with the same moronic repetitious and baseless claims in the face of your own contradictions and lack of credibility.

and yes you are an idiot. Thanks for the admission and the trolling have a nice day. LOL

 

[Si modo]

WOW more of your usual baseless attacks. The sad thing is that you are now flip flopping AGAIN. You argued that same spiel to begin with and then after being shown you were wrong you flipped and said,

(see how EASY it is to quote a post?)

and now you have flipped AGAIN showing that you have zero credibility to



LOL the other sad thing is that in the post I quoted you talked about "This is why I like reasonable arguments - folks using links, sources, etc - rather than just flames." when all you TRY to do is flame. However, you are an attack dog that barks A LOT but has no bite as you make the same baseless accusation over and over again.

BTW I am still waiting on you to PROVE your claim that I parroted that last timeline argument. You made the claim and have ran away from proving it because you know that you can't. However, go ahead and attack me with your lies again. Please, continue to show how your attempt at flaming me is all that you have to offer. LOL

LMAO! Like clockwork.

Idiot.

Yes you are like clockwork with the same moronic repetitious and baseless claims in the face of your own contradictions and lack of credibility.

and yes you are an idiot. Thanks for the admission and the trolling have a nice day. LOL

Are you REALLY going to go away? You've been promising for days, yet you keep coming back.

 

[drsmith1072]

Unsubscribing time..... now.

LOL The sad thing is that all si has to offer after being shown to be and admitting that he was wrong is namecalling in a thread about righties whining about namecalling. LOL

 

[Si modo]

LMAO! Like clockwork.

Idiot.

Yes you are like clockwork with the same moronic repetitious and baseless claims in the face of your own contradictions and lack of credibility.

and yes you are an idiot. Thanks for the admission and the trolling have a nice day. LOL

Are you REALLY going to go away? You've been promising for days, yet you keep coming back.

Unsubscribing time..... now.

LOL The sad thing is that all si has to offer after being shown to be and admitting that he was wrong is namecalling in a thread about righties whining about namecalling. LOL

Diiiiiiiidn't think so.