Bill Maher: New Rules for Teabaggers

[drsmith1072]

Do you ever think of the term, 'broken record' whenever Smith is in a thread?

I know this is at least the second time you've said this to him.

(He's not too bright, eh.)

aww imagine that, you still can't prove your accusation against me so you have to jump on someone else’s coat tails to attack me personally in a desperate attempt to CYA and avoid admitting that you were and are WRONG. LOL

The sad thing is that you try to call me a broken record and then call out murf for repeating the same baseless argument like a broken record. LOL

It's now an 'accusation'?

Make up your mind. I can only imagine the disordered thoughts in your head as being similar to some turbulent flow system, but I would bet good money that is a reaching simile. Likely, random number generators have more organization than the firing of synapses in the space encapsulated by your skull.

WOW you must be really desperate if you are trying to focus on the definition of the terminology I used so you can avoid proving your argument/claim/accusation.

The terminology I used is quite appropriate since you "accused" me of parroting an early argument and as of yet have completely failed to prove that accusation/claim/argument.

So can you prove that I parroted it or NOT?

The fact that you keep running away from doing so shows that you can't.

 

[boedicca]

Don't expect any evidence. Just sayin'

boedicca is a liar, pure and simple.

You never learn. I don't post things which are not true:

"You guys are both golfers," Chafets told Limbaugh. "Would you play a round with the president and show the country that there are no hard feelings?"

"He's the president of the United States," Limbaugh told Chafets. "If any president asked me to meet him, or play golf with him, I'd do it. But I promise you that will never happen. His base on the left would have a s--t-fit."

"How about letting me ask?" Chafets said.

"Go ahead," Limbaugh said. "Nothing will come of it."

Chafets writes that he reached out to Obama adviser David Axelrod, "whom I know slightly," but Axelrod didn't return calls. Then Chafets spoke to "a very senior Democratic activist with whom I'm friendly" who said he would convey the message.

A day or two later the adviser responded, "Limbaugh can play with himself." Chafets wouldn't name the aide or say whether the quote was directly from Obama.

Obama to Limbaugh:go play with yourself - NYPOST.com


The response from the White House was "Limbaugh can play with himself". As Obama is President, he is responsible for such communications.

Very low class.

 

[Si modo]

aww imagine that, you still can't prove your accusation against me so you have to jump on someone else’s coat tails to attack me personally in a desperate attempt to CYA and avoid admitting that you were and are WRONG. LOL

The sad thing is that you try to call me a broken record and then call out murf for repeating the same baseless argument like a broken record. LOL

It's now an 'accusation'?

Make up your mind. I can only imagine the disordered thoughts in your head as being similar to some turbulent flow system, but I would bet good money that is a reaching simile. Likely, random number generators have more organization than the firing of synapses in the space encapsulated by your skull.

WOW you must be really desperate if you are trying to focus on the definition of the terminology I used so you can avoid proving your argument/claim/accusation.

The terminology I used is quite appropriate since you "accused" me of parroting an early argument and as of yet have completely failed to prove that accusation/claim/argument.

So can you prove that I parroted it or NOT?

The fact that you keep running away from doing so shows that you can't.

All you've done so far is quote others' points (points made a week ago, ), demonstrate that you post before reading (classic knee-jerk behavior), cannot articulate a clear original thought, can't make up your mind, etc.

Do you have ANY point to make of ANY significance?

I guess you really wish I would 'run away' and 'avoid' you, but that's not happening right now. The forum is rather boring as it's slow news this week, so you've got me and others highlighting your idiocy.

Tell me I'm running away/avoiding you again. It makes me laugh.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Boedicca and si modo continue to ignore context, either willfully creating falsehoods or revealing inherent cognitive difficulties.

Gotta give the whole story, guys.

 

[Si modo]

Boedicca and si modo continue to ignore context, either willfully creating falsehoods or revealing inherent cognitive difficulties.

Gotta give the whole story, guys.

Jake relishes in the sidelines.

But, honestly, Jake, I bet you look cuter than that in your little outfits.

Oh well, better a cheerleader than a waterboy, like Smith.

 

[boedicca]

Boedicca and si modo continue to ignore context, either willfully creating falsehoods or revealing inherent cognitive difficulties.

Gotta give the whole story, guys.

That's pretty funny coming from someone who promotes the T-word myth.

 

[drsmith1072]

Don't expect any evidence. Just sayin'

boedicca is a liar, pure and simple.

You never learn. I don't post things which are not true:

"You guys are both golfers," Chafets told Limbaugh. "Would you play a round with the president and show the country that there are no hard feelings?"

"He's the president of the United States," Limbaugh told Chafets. "If any president asked me to meet him, or play golf with him, I'd do it. But I promise you that will never happen. His base on the left would have a s--t-fit."

"How about letting me ask?" Chafets said.

"Go ahead," Limbaugh said. "Nothing will come of it."

Chafets writes that he reached out to Obama adviser David Axelrod, "whom I know slightly," but Axelrod didn't return calls. Then Chafets spoke to "a very senior Democratic activist with whom I'm friendly" who said he would convey the message.

A day or two later the adviser responded, "Limbaugh can play with himself." Chafets wouldn't name the aide or say whether the quote was directly from Obama.

Obama to Limbaugh:go play with yourself - NYPOST.com


The response from the White House was "Limbaugh can play with himself". As Obama is President, he is responsible for such communications.

Very low class.

what is very low class is YOU trying to attack obama for something an advisor said. The advisor making that comment is a far cry from

And now The One has told Rush Limbaugh to "play with himself".

How classy!

Furthermore, what do you assume the advisor meant by "play with himself"? Did your mind go straight to the gutter??

The other thing that is hilarious is that this thread is all about calling people names and then you go and refer to obama as "The One." Thanks for the blatantly obvious hypocrisy. LOL
It's funny how NOW that a democrat is in office that everything that comes from the white house is to be taken as obama's own words and yet i don't seem to remember right-wingers applying that standard to W's whitehouse. I wonder why the differing standards?

 

[drsmith1072]

It's now an 'accusation'?

Make up your mind. I can only imagine the disordered thoughts in your head as being similar to some turbulent flow system, but I would bet good money that is a reaching simile. Likely, random number generators have more organization than the firing of synapses in the space encapsulated by your skull.

WOW you must be really desperate if you are trying to focus on the definition of the terminology I used so you can avoid proving your argument/claim/accusation.

The terminology I used is quite appropriate since you "accused" me of parroting an early argument and as of yet have completely failed to prove that accusation/claim/argument.

So can you prove that I parroted it or NOT?

The fact that you keep running away from doing so shows that you can't.

All you've done so far is quote others' points (points made a week ago, ), demonstrate that you post before reading (classic knee-jerk behavior), cannot articulate a clear original thought, can't make up your mind, etc.

Do you have ANY point to make of ANY significance?

I guess you really wish I would 'run away' and 'avoid' you, but that's not happening right now. The forum is rather boring as it's slow news this week, so you've got me and others highlighting your idiocy.

Tell me I'm running away/avoiding you again. It makes me laugh.

Parroting the false claim that you have yet to prove as you engage in personal attacks is just more of your usual avoidance.

Prove your claim/accusation/argument. The sad FACT is that you know that you can't or else you would have.

BTW nice avoidance of the fact that you exposed yourself as a tool when you tried to attack me for using the term "accusation" instead of claim or argument when all applied to what you were doing.

You just can't help showing how dishonest you truly are can you? LOL

 

[Si modo]

WOW you must be really desperate if you are trying to focus on the definition of the terminology I used so you can avoid proving your argument/claim/accusation.

The terminology I used is quite appropriate since you "accused" me of parroting an early argument and as of yet have completely failed to prove that accusation/claim/argument.

So can you prove that I parroted it or NOT?

The fact that you keep running away from doing so shows that you can't.

All you've done so far is quote others' points (points made a week ago, ), demonstrate that you post before reading (classic knee-jerk behavior), cannot articulate a clear original thought, can't make up your mind, etc.

Do you have ANY point to make of ANY significance?

I guess you really wish I would 'run away' and 'avoid' you, but that's not happening right now. The forum is rather boring as it's slow news this week, so you've got me and others highlighting your idiocy.

Tell me I'm running away/avoiding you again. It makes me laugh.

Parroting the false claim that you have yet to prove as you engage in personal attacks is just more of your usual avoidance.

Prove your claim/accusation/argument. The sad FACT is that you know that you can't or else you would have.

BTW nice avoidance of the fact that you exposed yourself as a tool when you tried to attack me for using the term "accusation" instead of claim or argument when all applied to what you were doing.

You just can't help showing how dishonest you truly are can you? LOL

You STILL can't figure out what you want? And you STILL can't make any point with any significance?

Amazing, waterboy.

 

[drsmith1072]

Boedicca and si modo continue to ignore context, either willfully creating falsehoods or revealing inherent cognitive difficulties.

Gotta give the whole story, guys.

LOL boedicca just seems to run with whatever propaganda he is fed without question and Si just continues to parrot the same basless accusation over and over again so he can avoid proving his claims.

The sad thing is that I actually believe that they know they have nothing but my guess is that they believe that if they just continue posting and endless amount of trolling baseless attack posts that they are actually responding to what has been written when nothing could be further from the truth.

 

[boedicca]

drsmith makes the mistake of assuming I'm a man.

I would never make the mistake of thinking he is one.

 

[drsmith1072]

All you've done so far is quote others' points (points made a week ago, ), demonstrate that you post before reading (classic knee-jerk behavior), cannot articulate a clear original thought, can't make up your mind, etc.

Do you have ANY point to make of ANY significance?

I guess you really wish I would 'run away' and 'avoid' you, but that's not happening right now. The forum is rather boring as it's slow news this week, so you've got me and others highlighting your idiocy.

Tell me I'm running away/avoiding you again. It makes me laugh.

Parroting the false claim that you have yet to prove as you engage in personal attacks is just more of your usual avoidance.

Prove your claim/accusation/argument. The sad FACT is that you know that you can't or else you would have.

BTW nice avoidance of the fact that you exposed yourself as a tool when you tried to attack me for using the term "accusation" instead of claim or argument when all applied to what you were doing.

You just can't help showing how dishonest you truly are can you? LOL

You STILL can't figure out what you want? And you STILL can't make any point with any significance?

Amazing, waterboy.

WOW you really are retarded aren't you??

I have specified what I want and have asked you multiple times to prove your repeated false allegation that I parroted the argument concerning when obama used the "tea-bagger" term in reference to when he called for civility according to the original argument.

You claim that I parroted it, then PROVE that I did. It's simple enough to do IF you can. all you have to do is show ONE post prior to me making that timeline argument in which the poster made that same argument and you can prove your claim. However, you continue to avoid doing so as you keep parroting the same lame defenses of your indefensible position. LOL

How many time does it have to be spelled out to you before you begin to comprehend??

 

[drsmith1072]

drsmith makes the mistake of assuming I'm a man.

I would never make the mistake of thinking he is one.

Whether you are a man or a woman it has NO bearing on the fact that you are troll and you like Si cannot offer anything REAL to substantiate your claims.

Attacking the messenger will not substantiate your claims either.

 

[Si modo]

Parroting the false claim that you have yet to prove as you engage in personal attacks is just more of your usual avoidance.

Prove your claim/accusation/argument. The sad FACT is that you know that you can't or else you would have.

BTW nice avoidance of the fact that you exposed yourself as a tool when you tried to attack me for using the term "accusation" instead of claim or argument when all applied to what you were doing.

You just can't help showing how dishonest you truly are can you? LOL

You STILL can't figure out what you want? And you STILL can't make any point with any significance?

Amazing, waterboy.

WOW you really are retarded aren't you??

I have specified what I want and have asked you multiple times to prove your repeated false allegation that I parroted the argument concerning when obama used the "tea-bagger" term in reference to when he called for civility according to the original argument.

You claim that I parroted it, then PROVE that I did. It's simple enough to do IF you can. all you have to do is show ONE post prior to me making that timeline argument in which the poster made that same argument and you can prove your claim. However, you continue to avoid doing so as you keep parroting the same lame defenses of your indefensible position. LOL

How many time does it have to be spelled out to you before you begin to comprehend??

I'm impressed with your projections. You come into this thread looking like a fool by thinking you are debating while simply parroting posts others made last week.

Then, you think you've come up with some earth-shattering point of great significance to 'refute' the opinions of so many that Obama is classless since he used the term teabagger and that Obama is a hypocrite in asking for civility.

You are nothing but a waterboy who has found a pebble thinking it is of some significance to the game.

What a fucking moron you are.

Now, go make yourself useful and get us some water, boy.

 

[drsmith1072]

You STILL can't figure out what you want? And you STILL can't make any point with any significance?

Amazing, waterboy.

WOW you really are retarded aren't you??

I have specified what I want and have asked you multiple times to prove your repeated false allegation that I parroted the argument concerning when obama used the "tea-bagger" term in reference to when he called for civility according to the original argument.

You claim that I parroted it, then PROVE that I did. It's simple enough to do IF you can. all you have to do is show ONE post prior to me making that timeline argument in which the poster made that same argument and you can prove your claim. However, you continue to avoid doing so as you keep parroting the same lame defenses of your indefensible position. LOL

How many time does it have to be spelled out to you before you begin to comprehend??

I'm impressed with your projections. You come into this thread looking like a fool by thinking you are debating while simply parroting posts others made last week.

Then, you think you've come up with some earth-shattering point of great significance to 'refute' the opinions of so many that Obama is classless since he uses the term teabagger and that Obama is a hypocrite in doing so.

You are nothing but a waterboy who has found a pebble thinking it is of some significance.

What a fucking moron you are.

OK so when are you going to prove your accusation that i parroted the argument that I have asked you about for most of the week??

You keep "responding" with baseless accusations and personal attacks and yet fail to provide PROOF of your accusations that I parroted.

As usual when push comes to shove all you do is show that you have NOTHING as you parrot the same false allegation over and over and over again. LOL

 

[Si modo]

WOW you really are retarded aren't you??

I have specified what I want and have asked you multiple times to prove your repeated false allegation that I parroted the argument concerning when obama used the "tea-bagger" term in reference to when he called for civility according to the original argument.

You claim that I parroted it, then PROVE that I did. It's simple enough to do IF you can. all you have to do is show ONE post prior to me making that timeline argument in which the poster made that same argument and you can prove your claim. However, you continue to avoid doing so as you keep parroting the same lame defenses of your indefensible position. LOL

How many time does it have to be spelled out to you before you begin to comprehend??

I'm impressed with your projections. You come into this thread looking like a fool by thinking you are debating while simply parroting posts others made last week.

Then, you think you've come up with some earth-shattering point of great significance to 'refute' the opinions of so many that Obama is classless since he uses the term teabagger and that Obama is a hypocrite in doing so.

You are nothing but a waterboy who has found a pebble thinking it is of some significance.

What a fucking moron you are.

OK so when are you going to prove your accusation that i parroted the argument that I have asked you about for most of the week??

You keep "responding" with baseless accusations and personal attacks and yet fail to provide PROOF of your accusations that I parroted.

As usual when push comes to shove all you do is show that you have NOTHING as you parrot the same false allegation over and over and over again. LOL

Oh

my

God.



Once again, waterboy: I am NOT going to inanely repost your parroting - and my days-ago-and-already pointing it out - pages back in the thread. Unlike you, most posters (the thinking ones) actually READ the fucking threads.

Those who don't, like you, are morons and I really don't care if morons agree with me or not.

 

[drsmith1072]

I'm impressed with your projections. You come into this thread looking like a fool by thinking you are debating while simply parroting posts others made last week.

Then, you think you've come up with some earth-shattering point of great significance to 'refute' the opinions of so many that Obama is classless since he uses the term teabagger and that Obama is a hypocrite in doing so.

You are nothing but a waterboy who has found a pebble thinking it is of some significance.

What a fucking moron you are.

OK so when are you going to prove your accusation that i parroted the argument that I have asked you about for most of the week??

You keep "responding" with baseless accusations and personal attacks and yet fail to provide PROOF of your accusations that I parroted.

As usual when push comes to shove all you do is show that you have NOTHING as you parrot the same false allegation over and over and over again. LOL

Oh

my

God.



Once again, waterboy: I am NOT going to inanely repost your parroting - and my days-ago-and-already pointing it out - pages back in the thread. Unlike you, most posters (the thinking ones) actually READ the fucking threads.

Those who don't, like you, are morons and I really don't care if morons agree with me or not.

Thanks for admitting that you won't and can't prove your accusation. All you have done "days-ago" and since was make the same unsubstantiated accusation that you are parroting now. You never proved it back then and you still haven't.

Keep running loser, parroting the same lame excuses over and over again is not a valid defense and makes you look ridiculous and hypocritical. LOL

 

[Si modo]

OK so when are you going to prove your accusation that i parroted the argument that I have asked you about for most of the week??

You keep "responding" with baseless accusations and personal attacks and yet fail to provide PROOF of your accusations that I parroted.

As usual when push comes to shove all you do is show that you have NOTHING as you parrot the same false allegation over and over and over again. LOL

Oh

my

God.



Once again, waterboy: I am NOT going to inanely repost your parroting - and my days-ago-and-already pointing it out - pages back in the thread. Unlike you, most posters (the thinking ones) actually READ the fucking threads.

Those who don't, like you, are morons and I really don't care if morons agree with me or not.

Thanks for admitting that you won't and can't prove your accusation. All you have done "days-ago" was make the same unsubstantiated claim that you are making now. You never proved it back then and you still haven't

Keep running loser, parroting the same lame excuses over and over again is not a valid defense and makes you look ridiculous and hypocritical. LOL

Your thought processes allow you to think that my already doing what you asked is equvalent to admitting that it wasn't done.



I know you WISH I would run away, but I haven't.

 

[drsmith1072]

Let's see, here is the cycle that you have engaged in.
You attacked me claiming I parroted an argument, then i ask you to prove your accusation, you attack me even more repeating said claim that I parroted my claim while you still fail to offer anything of substance to support that accusation. Then after parroting the same accusation a few more times you then ask "what is your point?" so I spell out my point AGAIN and then you start the cycle over again. You have been down this same cycle of avoidance a few times already so it will be no surprise when you ask me "what is your point?" again. LOL

 

[Si modo]

Let's see, here is the cycle that you have engaged in.
You attacked me claiming I parroted an argument, then i ask you to prove your accusation, you attack me even more repeating said claim that I parroted my claim while you still fail to offer anything of substance to support that accusation. Then after parroting the same accusation a few more times you then ask "what is your point?" so I spell out my point AGAIN and then you start the cycle over again. You have been down this same cycle of avoidance a few times already so it will be no surprise when you ask me "what is your point?" again. LOL

Still need a fix of bandwidth? Not getting enough attention, waterboy?

I know it's hard for the insane to grasp simple facts, but seriously, does the home know that you're out and about?

Come on, tell me that I'm running away, again.