Bill Maher Goes Off On Neil deGrasse Tyson

[Mr. Friscus]

But women distance swimmers was an add fact to the conversation. On the whole, men are stronger at sports, but Tyson was nearly pointing out one subtle difference. These differences and facts are allowed from either side of the fence.

Most Americans are binary in thinking, they deem folk MUST be either for or against.

It just shows he won’t speak against the woke belief, but he’ll offer added facts for the whole belief.

he’s not an aggressive advocate, but he won’t fight against unscientific woke claims

 

[Slade3200]

They didn’t, then they did. They weren’t careful with their language at all. And given context of their radical ideology they clearly support, I have no faith that they would outright declare men are better than women in sports because of biological reasons. I think they’d be afraid to say it because it would offend their woke/trans base

That would be an absurd scientific proclamation to make. Pick a specific sport and yes you can make a statistical and scientific argument about who is better… but also… why? What a silly thing to push a scientist to say. Obviously politically juiced up.

What if future sports are virtual or in a zero atmosphere or involve other elements than our traditional sports that were developed by men and for men? You see why a scientist wouldn’t want to go down these political rabbit holes, don’t you?

 

[Slade3200]

They didn’t, then they did. They weren’t careful with their language at all. And given context of their radical ideology they clearly support, I have no faith that they would outright declare men are better than women in sports because of biological reasons. I think they’d be afraid to say it because it would offend their woke/trans base

Also radical agendas are drivers of new ideas and innovation n science. They aren’t a bad thing in the least

 

[HikerGuy83]

No, just pointing out the obvious.

When we get into actual policies, I'll point out the foolishness of them.

Now I'm just laughing about how clownish Trump's appointment are...

Could care less about your comments on much of anything.

But got ahead and knock yourself out.....literally.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Also radical agendas are drivers of new ideas and innovation n science. They aren’t a bad thing in the least

I’m sorry, but if you want to be reputable magazine, you can’t be floundering in crazed ideas…

SLADES AMERICAN SCIENCE JOURNAL
Pg 3: Humans don’t breathe oxygen
Pg 10: The earth doesn’t revolve around the sun after all! A study.
Pg 17: evidence that the earth is flat!

Etc..

No scientific magazine that wants to be seen as credible or legitimate would post radical crazy stuff like this. Yet, the Scientific American is saying men should compete with women and there’s no scientific reason why they shouldn’t.

Thus, the scientific American shouldn’t be seen as credible any longer.

 

[JoeB131]

It doesn't matter what someone THINKS they are. You can call it whatever you like. What don't you understand about that?

The part where you are being intentionally bigoted, I guess.

You would know all about PornHub. I won't argue with you on that point.

As far as catching peak, you don't think a man would want to watch women shower at the gym? You can't be that naive can you?

Naw, I can't imagine anyone over the age of 17 wanting to do that...but your arrested development is your own problem.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

That would be an absurd scientific proclamation to make. Pick a specific sport and yes you can make a statistical and scientific argument about who is better

Name a sport that women are better than men at?

There isn’t one.

And there’s biological reasons for that which are important

… but also… why? What a silly thing to push a scientist to say. Obviously politically juiced up.

Its important to distinguish given the radical anti-science trans ideology that media, democrats, schools, psychology etc are trying to mainstream.

Human biology is at the forefront of importance in modern science.. and here you are not wanting scientists to address it?

Why??

What if future sports are virtual or in a zero atmosphere or involve other elements than our traditional sports that were developed by men and for men? You see why a scientist wouldn’t want to go down these political rabbit holes, don’t you?

What if a tree grew out of your ass?

Let’s stick with the likely present

 

[JoeB131]

1. Men are men and women are women.

Nope. Gender identity is a spectrum.

2. “Gender” was a concept invented in the 1960’s by academic perverts who ran experiments that involved ejaculating children

I would ask what you are talking about, but I don't think I want to know.

3. If a person thinks they are a different sex, they have gender dysphoria, and the compassionate things to do is help them move beyond it over time.

Except they've tried that and it doesn't work.

4. You and your woke tribe are harming these people by convincing and cheering them into confusion, high depression, and high suicide. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves to be so heartless.

The only reason why Transgenders have high rates of depression and suicide is dealing with bigots like you.

 

[JoeB131]

We need to encourage him though… his “evil white people” and “opposing men in women’s sports/bathrooms is transphobic” positions are what killed and will kill the Democrat party as far as being taken seriously by the middle voters.

As much a woke nutjob as JoeB131 is, the best thing that can happen to conservativism and the GOP is for people like him to keep talking.

again, at one time, black people riding at the front of the bus was considered being a woke nutjob.

What killed the Democrats was that their President dropped out and gas was too expensive.

What I heard more than anything else this time was "I don't like either one of them."

 

[SweetTea]

The part where you are being intentionally bigoted, I guess

If a person thinks they are something they are not, it is not bigoted of me to say they should not receive any special considerations that may be afforded to the subjects of their confusion.

Naw, I can't imagine anyone over the age of 17 wanting to do that...but your arrested development is your own problem.

So millions of people above the age of 17 go to PornHub and other porn sites to view naked people and yet they wouldn’t have any desire to see the real thing in a locker room setting with the only caveat being that they have to put on a dress? You are very, very naive.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Nope. Gender identity is a spectrum.

Nope. You are male or female. Science, try it.

I would ask what you are talking about, but I don't think I want to know.

Alfred Kinsey: 'Father of sexual revolution' who said rape benefits children

Alfred Kinsey, hailed by a large section of Americans as the "father of sexual revolution", had died on 25 August 1956. | OpIndia News

www.opindia.com

Your ideology began with a disgusting immoral pervert.

Except they've tried that and it doesn't work.

If you suffer from depression and it doesn’t go away with treatment, you don’t embrace the depression and say it’s a good thing and try to get more depressed. In a study of people who went through gender dysphoria without the indoctrination ended up just being confused gay people, and they went about their lives fine afterwards.

It’s only the continued, propaganda fueled drive away from your biological sex that maintains the uneasiness, depression, and instability in the psyche of a trans person. It makes them suffer more, and you cheer that on. It’s like cheering on an alcoholic whose drinking is ruining their family

The only reason why Transgenders have high rates of depression and suicide is dealing with bigots like you.

Nope. Our society has catered drastically to near worship of the trans condition and yet, they still suffer the same.

Plus, as this glorification happened and exposure to the condition increased, not all age groups identified at the same rate.

So, this is largely a social contagion and indoctrination of the youth. It’s the cool thing to do, the latest way boring teens can make themselves more interesting because they lack personality or interests of their own. It’s the “goth” movement but way worse and with irreversible effects.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Not at all.

The problem with Clinton's modification to the Community Reinvestment Act (which has been around since the 1970's) is that it had no effect on the banking crisis. In fact, CRA loans were far more closely scrutinized

CRA Myth and Fact » NCRC

Myth: The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) caused the foreclosure crisis.

ncrc.org

The majority of subprime loans were originated by non-CRA covered financial institutions. In fact, only about 25 percent of sub-prime loans were made by institutions covered by CRA.¹

CRA was passed in 1977. The explosive growth in subprime lending occurred more than two decades later, nearly doubling from 2001-2006 alone. No major changes to CRA were enacted during this time.
CRA does not mandate banks to make only home loans. Banks are encouraged to examine credit needs and lend appropriately based on these needs (for small business, home, and other types of loans).
CRA penalizes banks for reckless, irresponsible and otherwise predatory lending.

What caused the 2008 Crash was 1) Banks making reckless loans to middle class people without income verifications to buy houses they planned to flip quickly, and selling those garbage mortgages as investments. The SEC provided very little oversight to this activity.

The Jihad's WMD Is Its Oilfields

The slumdogs who lived on the property were the garbage. Bankers sold the defaulted property at a high profit to developers of upscale inner-city apartments for unmarried Yuppies working downtown. Only when the market got saturated were they left holding the garbage.

Record price-gouging by the OPECkers had a lot to do with crashing the financial industry. You can bet on that because it is never blamed by our ignorant hired media.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Of course… meet a flat earther and question their theories, ask to see their proof. Learn to listen and engage. Or we could take the path of many here which is to plug your ears and call them names. pointless

Fumes Fumigate

Would my theory that auto emissions exterminate viruses meet your criteria on what is worth debating?

 

[LibertyKid]

It’s only the continued, propaganda fueled drive away from your biological sex that maintains the uneasiness, depression, and instability in the psyche of a trans person. It makes them suffer more, and you cheer that on. It’s like cheering on an alcoholic whose drinking is ruining their family

And it's the illogical conclusion that many people have a concern with. Gender dysphoria should not equate to hormone therapy, GAC, and the absolute risks, irreversibility, and life time treatments that come with GAC. There is a lot of unknowns and the long term effects, we still don't fully understand. Can we start with the concept that the biological body we are born with should be the body we learn to love and try and get those that are 'dysphoric' to love?

In the following article from SEGM they state that regret rates are hard to know.

One moment, please...

And in another report from SEGM (yes, it's UK based) talks about how the recent Cass Report failed to receive the attention from the US medical field. Wonder why that is?

Gender medicine in the US: how the Cass review failed to land

A landmark investigation with bearing on the future of gender identity services for children and adolescents has been pivotal in the UK—and largely ignored by US medical organisations and media. Jennifer Block reports on how America has resisted the push for a more holistic approach The newly...

www.bmj.com

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

You seem to be very in tune with how they think. How did that happen?

Gone Geeks

I saw myself going that way and felt like I was jerking off; they never realized what was happening to them and still don't.

Those in power did an effective job in minimizing them. Since the mentally talented create all the surplus wealth of the plutocracy, its only fear is that geniuses will tell themselves, "If you're so smart, why haven't you made the rich poorer?"

To divert that fight-back attitude, a self-protective policy was adopted to merely neutralize those who chose not to become Cash Cows for Corporate Cowboys, instead of forcing them to do that. The plutocracy has plenty of suckers, so it can afford to have many harmless others who are neither helpful nor harmful.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

What are you even copy-pasting?

The CRA forced banks to take loans from low-income areas based on the ideology that “everyone deserves a home” (a whimsical, but harmful slogan)

Nobody said there’s not blame in the banks, but Clinton created pressure on the banks. Free market banks would have never taken those loans on.

It’s one of the many examples of democrat policy being good in intention but harmful in practice. And.. plenty of people could point to how the CRA would be harmful in this manner, but the Democrats stuck to the emotional appeal and made us all find out the hard way..

Just a lack of wisdom from your party

As Always, the Left and Right Wings of the Vulture Work Together. Otherwise, It Wouldn't Fly.

In 200l, the bankster-loving Conservatives controlled the government. They could have easily canceled the ghetto-gutter policy. So they saw it as a scheme for lucrative flipper loans, despite its apparent socialist-justice reputation.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Here’s some more “science”

Trans Girls Belong on Girls' Sports Teams

There is no scientific case for excluding them

www.scientificamerican.com

Right under the headline:
“There is no scientific case for excluding them”

That’s factually false, and ascientific.. In an “esteemed” science magazine.

They are ideologues, not scientists.

In College, the Student Lives Like a Child. That's Why He Graduates with the Mind of a Child.

If you believe in this indentured-servitude "higher" education, which no one questions, then you have to accept what it produces: childish escapists having the reputation of being top scientists.

 

[Couchpotato]

It just shows he won’t speak against the woke belief, but he’ll offer added facts for the whole belief.

he’s not an aggressive advocate, but he won’t fight against unscientific woke claims

Didnt he get Me Too'ed? Seems they scared him just enough.

 

[22lcidw]

again, at one time, black people riding at the front of the bus was considered being a woke nutjob.

What killed the Democrats was that their President dropped out and gas was too expensive.

What I heard more than anything else this time was "I don't like either one of them."

Your views may have merit. May have no merit. However, all of this exists as long as we have resources in our nation. When the resources slow to a trickle, the nastiness ensues. And people die. It just depends on who is chosen to be genocided. Having all of these sexual ways is massively expensive to taxpayers and consumers.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Didnt he get Me Too'ed? Seems they scared him just enough.

While it’s clear more and more of society is publicly rejecting the woke agenda, some will continue to support it, or be afraid to speak against it.

No idea which camp Tyson is in there, but he was presented with a complete unscientific claim and refused to oppose it. Again, it’s like if Maher and brought up flat earth theory and Tyson sat there and refused to attack it, and even offered a small support of it