Bill Maher Goes Off On Neil deGrasse Tyson

[Mr. Friscus]

Wait, believing in gender equality is just like being Hitler?

No, not even close. Reread and try again.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

No it’s not like that at all. Care to respond to my last response to you. About the co text of “inequality” that it sounds to me like you misinterpreted

There’s nothing to misinterpret. If they are being misunderstood, They really shouldn’t be making bold statements that they then contradict.

But, I provided another example of the scientific American posting trans ideology proclamations of how boys should compete With girls in their magazine.. which isn’t scientific/sensical.

This isn’t a one-off. The Scientific American is the latest academic vessel to sell their legitimacy in the name of woke advocacy. And these issues are being rejected by the American people, and science is the people’s side, not the science magazine’s.

Perhaps some civilians can come “educate” these misinformed folk at the scientific American sometime?

 

[LibertyKid]

The left during covid: Believe the scientist who say that Covid came from a wet market, anything else is a conspiracy.
The Right: But there is a lab, in wuhan, that is conducting gain of function research on Corono viruses, maybe the leak came from there?
The Left: **** off you Trumper, I can't believe you want to let millions of people die so stop believing in conspiracies.

The Right on Biology: Science says humans are born either male or female.
The left: **** Science you ******* nazi, hitler, fascist pig, I can't believe you want to take away female rights.

 

[JoeB131]

The Post office was efficient until Trump took office?

More efficient than it was after DeJoy started ******* things up.

I knew I could count on my mail arriving with 1-3 days after I sent it.

Now it's more of a crap shoot, and I usually mail things out a week before they need to get there.

 

[JoeB131]

There’s nothing to misinterpret. If they are being misunderstood, They really shouldn’t be making bold statements that they then contradict.

But, I provided another example of the scientific American posting trans ideology proclamations of how boys should compete With girls in their magazine.. which isn’t scientific/sensical.

This isn’t a one-off. The Scientific American is the latest academic vessel to sell their legitimacy in the name of woke advocacy. And these issues are being rejected by the American people, and science is the people’s side, not the science magazine’s.

Perhaps some civilians can come “educate” these misinformed folk at the scientific American sometime?

Guy, the only people upset about woke and trans are a bunch of white incels.

People (barely) voted for Trump because they were upset about the cost of eggs.

 

[JoeB131]

The left during covid: Believe the scientist who say that Covid came from a wet market, anything else is a conspiracy.
The Right: But there is a lab, in wuhan, that is conducting gain of function research on Corono viruses, maybe the leak came from there?
The Left: **** off you Trumper, I can't believe you want to let millions of people die so stop believing in conspiracies.

Okay, let's look at this little bit of stupidity, "Kid".

How did where the virus came from (and sorry, all the evidence still points to the wet market) have any effect on Trump and his allies-

Fighting against Masking
Fighting against vaccines
Promoting quack cures like Ivermectin and Hydrochloroquinine.
Promoting quack experts like Bobby Brainworm and Scott Atlas over people who knew what they were talking about.
Oppossing social distancing.
Holding mass spreader events (Poor Herman Cain, he died as he lived, being a pathetic Uncle Tom).

The Right on Biology: Science says humans are born either male or female.
The left: **** Science you ******* nazi, hitler, fascist pig, I can't believe you want to take away female rights.

Except that's not what science says. Science says that sexuality is really on a spectrum. That there is scientific proof that transgender brains are structured more like their identified sex than their biological sex.

Transgender brains are more like their desired gender from an early age

New brain imaging research reveals that transgender adolescents show brain activity patterns more similar to their experienced gender than their assigned sex at birth. Using MRI scans and tests involving pheromones and memory exercises, scientists found that these teens’ brains responded in ways...

www.sciencedaily.com

The real question is why you guys are so upset about transgenders daring to exist at all.

 

[JoeB131]

No, not even close. Reread and try again.

I don't think I need to, you went full Godwin. Never go full Godwin.

 

[LibertyKid]

Okay, let's look at this little bit of stupidity, "Kid".

How did where the virus came from (and sorry, all the evidence still points to the wet market) have any effect on Trump and his allies-

Fighting against Masking
Fighting against vaccines
Promoting quack cures like Ivermectin and Hydrochloroquinine.
Promoting quack experts like Bobby Brainworm and Scott Atlas over people who knew what they were talking about.
Oppossing social distancing.
Holding mass spreader events (Poor Herman Cain, he died as he lived, being a pathetic Uncle Tom).




Except that's not what science says. Science says that sexuality is really on a spectrum. That there is scientific proof that transgender brains are structured more like their identified sex than their biological sex.

Transgender brains are more like their desired gender from an early age

New brain imaging research reveals that transgender adolescents show brain activity patterns more similar to their experienced gender than their assigned sex at birth. Using MRI scans and tests involving pheromones and memory exercises, scientists found that these teens’ brains responded in ways...

www.sciencedaily.com

The real question is why you guys are so upset about transgenders daring to exist at all.

**** off Joe, I'm not going down this hole with you... again.

 

[SweetTea]

The sad thing about being an atheist is knowing that fat **** isn't burning in hell because there's no afterlife.

I can't attest to Rush's relationship with God, but if you continue down the same path, you will be in for a rude and long awakening.

 

[SweetTea]

Guy, the only people upset about woke and trans are a bunch of white incels.

I sincerly hope you and your party continues to believe this.

Normal people do have a problem with a biological male in the restroom and locker rooms with biological females. Maybe not in your circles, but your circles aren't normal.

The real question is why you guys are so upset about transgenders daring to exist at all.

We aren't, but as usual nuts and those that support nuts overstep their bounds. Dress like a woman if you want. I don't care, but don't expect normal people to treat you like a man just because you think you are one. That is completely absurd and most people recognize it.

You are right about one thing. We shouldn't be arguing about this, but we are because of people like you who are willing to accept something that is completely void of common sense to push an agenda.

 

[JoeB131]

**** off Joe, I'm not going down this hole with you... again.

I don't blame you, "Kid", you'd have to admit that your bigotry is kind of silly.

I can't attest to Rush's relationship with God, but if you continue down the same path, you will be in for a rude and long awakening.

I would like to think that if there is a God, He would care more about how much i tried to help people in my life, rather than how often I grovelled in front of him.

Your God would send Ann Frank to Hell and give Jeff Dahmner a harp and wings. That's fucked up, yo!

I sincerly hope you and your party continues to believe this.

Normal people do have a problem with a biological male in the restroom and locker rooms with biological females. Maybe not in your circles, but your circles aren't normal.

Again, doing the right thing should never be a political calculation.

Civil Rights wasn't a popular position in the 1950s. But it eventually won.

We aren't, but as usual nuts and those that support nuts overstep their bounds. Dress like a woman if you want. I don't care, but don't expect normal people to treat you like a man just because you think you are one. That is completely absurd and most people recognize it.

Most people want to be comfortable with their bigotry.

What does it really cost you to use a person's preferred pronouns?

You are right about one thing. We shouldn't be arguing about this, but we are because of people like you who are willing to accept something that is completely void of common sense to push an agenda.

Treating people with dignity is an "agenda". I hope so.

I'm sure you miss the good old days when Blacks rode on the back of the bus, women were in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant, and gays were safely in the closet. How dare they push an agenda of dignity.

 

[Slade3200]

Shapiro didn’t like him at first either. Their debates on that matter are quite entertaining. If you watch/listen your question would be answered. Got it?

My question was rhetorical

 

[Slade3200]

There’s nothing to misinterpret. If they are being misunderstood, They really shouldn’t be making bold statements that they then contradict.

Sounds to me like they are being misunderstood by people who didn’t read the article and that only got a warp analysis about one line from people in the media who are using it for political arguments

 

[Slade3200]

There’s nothing to misinterpret. If they are being misunderstood, They really shouldn’t be making bold statements that they then contradict.

But, I provided another example of the scientific American posting trans ideology proclamations of how boys should compete With girls in their magazine.. which isn’t scientific/sensical.

This isn’t a one-off. The Scientific American is the latest academic vessel to sell their legitimacy in the name of woke advocacy. And these issues are being rejected by the American people, and science is the people’s side, not the science magazine’s.

Perhaps some civilians can come “educate” these misinformed folk at the scientific American sometime?

Before we kick the can to another article that some guy wrote let’s finish the discussion about the topic at hand.

Have you read the actual article now? Do you understand the game being played and how you and others are distorting the message and taking the paragraph you highlighted out of context? The article was NOT calling males and females biologically equal. Do you have enough humility to admit that?

 

[LibertyKid]

I don't blame you, "Kid", you'd have to admit that your bigotry is kind of silly.

The only thing I will say is that you refuse to read anything counter to your own belief system, which is and of itself, bigotry, so pot meet kettle "dolt".

 

[SweetTea]

Again, doing the right thing should never be a political calculation.

Exactly, so why allow men into women's restrooms and locker rooms and on to women's sports teams. That isn't "right" by any reasonable measure.

Most people want to be comfortable with their bigotry.

If I claimed to be a billionaire and went to the bank to withdraw "my" money, would it be bigoted for them to turn me down or would it make sense perhaps not to kowtow to my delusion?

What does it really cost you to use a person's preferred pronouns?

Nothing, and I don't have a problem with it. Just don't get mad if reality slips in every now and then and I use the wrong one.

'm sure you miss the good old days when Blacks rode on the back of the bus, women were in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant, and gays were safely in the closet. How dare they push an agenda of dignity.

Being black is quite different than thinking you are something you aren't and expecting normal people to accomodate you to a point where it negatively affects them. Again, common sense should prevail.

 

[Slade3200]

The only thing I will say is that you refuse to read anything counter to your own belief system, which is and of itself, bigotry, so pot meet kettle "dolt".

I’m curious. Did you read the actual article that’s the topic of this thread? The one the Maher brought up to Tyson in the interview

 

[JoeB131]

Exactly, so why allow men into women's restrooms and locker rooms and on to women's sports teams. That isn't "right" by any reasonable measure.

well, here's the thing. Do you know how long gender-separated restrooms have been around? They've only been a thing since the late 19th century. Before that, men and women used the same bathrooms.

Most places have gender-neutral bathrooms now. It's just not a big deal.

If I claimed to be a billionaire and went to the bank to withdraw "my" money, would it be bigoted for them to turn me down or would it make sense perhaps not to kowtow to my delusion?

Works on the assumption transgender is a delusion. As I pointed out, there is an abundance of evidence that transgender brains operate like their preferred sex.

Nothing, and I don't have a problem with it. Just don't get mad if reality slips in every now and then and I use the wrong one.

So don't get upset when I slip and call you "Cleetus".

Being black is quite different than thinking you are something you aren't and expecting normal people to accomodate you to a point where it negatively affects them. Again, common sense should prevail.

Funny, I imagine a racist in 1950 saying the same thing, and most of them did.

 

[DStar777]

People on your side believe in talking snakes, I don't think you have much room to talk.

Talking snakes?

 

[OldFlame]

I agree for the most part. But what political opinion do you think he expressed in his interview with Maher?

He wouldn't state a scientific fact, that had everything to do with political opinion. If you have to deliberately steer away from stating a scientific fact, you'd think you'd ask yourself why you're doing that. What was the purpose for his dodging Maher's direct question?