Dadoalex
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2021
- 13,711
- 5,880
- 208
I'll take that as "I don't know shit about 230 except what Trump tells me."I know they cannot do what publishers do, but they do and should be responsible.No, the constitution.No Section 230.Twitter doesn't have to provide proof of anything.Twitter does not provide the proof for the banning of O'Keefe. Why? Maybe it does not exist? Of course it doesn't.
Twitter Refuses To Show Evidence James O'Keefe Created Fake Accounts
Twitter refused to provide any evidence Project Veritas Founder James O'Keefe operated fake accounts to justify the ban as the company claims.thefederalist.com
That pesky constitution standing in your way again.
230 says you can't sue the site for what some other guy says.
Too damn dumb to know your own arguments.
Tell ya what...
Why don't you ask the people running this site what they'll do if 230 goes away and they can be help liable for the crap posted here.
Let's hear their response.