'Big nothing burger': Fani Willis hearing failed to turn up evidence of corruption

Clue for the clue-full: People lie about sex all the time.

Might not want to do that under oath. Ask Clinton. Why should she want to hide a consensual relationship with an adult? I know liberals prefer men to fuck little kids, not adult women, but still, why hide it?
 
  • Listing the reasons for such on this venue would likely exhaust USMB's bandwidth.
  • Courtesy of the clueless

---------------------------------------------------------
Ok, earnest poster Frnken, you go first.
List all the reasons you have lied about sex.
Let's see if any of them would be applicable to the Georgia racketeering indictments against Don Trump, or to the prurient interests in the sex lives of two consenting adults.

Batter up, mi amigo.

Go:
 
She's done dude. Let it go.

She financially benefitted from this relationship. She then lied about it. She's done. She perpetrated a lie upon the court. Charge her with perjury and be done.
 
If she is allowed to stay, half the country will lose faith in our justice system, if they haven't already.

No, half the country will not.

The MAGA/QAnon constituency will not change.....they have lost faith in any court that doesn't exonerate Don Trump for everything, or anything, everywhere, all the time. So those Squeaky Frommes are already outta the gate. No net loss with that bunch of ne'er-do-wells.

But the rest of the country will view this as two consenting adults having an intimate relationship that has now been hijacked by those same Squeaky Frommes as some sort of deus ex machina to .....hold for it......once again exonerating Don Trump.

This time for, what? .....41 alleged crimes in Georgia?
 
Ok, earnest poster Frnken, you go first.
How was this decided? and by who?
List all the reasons you have lied about sex.
Same reason(s) everyone does...I thought I was smart enough to fool the ignorant masses and had something to hide.
Let's see if any of them would be applicable to the Georgia racketeering indictments against Don Trump,
Looks like a great big YES chi-co!...try another useless media cliche.
or to the prurient interests in the sex lives of two consenting adults.
Wade is the "southern gentlemen" Fani described him to be and she is the dutiful servant of the law who is doing what the white elitists in the party demand of her.

Willis and Wade are the minority faces [along with James and Bragg] that white libs hide behind in case things go south, when/if they do go south Wade and Wilis et. al. will take the hit and you get to play your race card... Jack Smith is the white lib at the top of the liberal legal totem pole whose presence is there to remind the minority contingent what is expected of and from them.

Like always, the white elitists have white and black America fighting it out while they remain behind the scenes...this is true in every setting...who were the white liberals in the Floyd case? how many were arrested or died for the cause? hint, it's a round number in both cases cuz they're the ones behind the cameras, typewriters and microphones fanning the flames.
 
Last edited:
Wade is the "southern gentlement" Fani described him to be and she is the dutiful servant of the law......."
---------------------------------------------------------------
Clue for the clue-full: Stop there.
While regard for your avatar is still above water.

Just sayin'.
 
guess the fact that the trials would all take place during the period of time Trump would be conducting his campaign was just a coincidence, Fort?
Yes, it is, because we have an election every 4 years.

And Trump.declared very early precisely in hopes of obstructing the investigations and court proceedings.
 
They lied under oath about it, though...lol

That's the part that stupid liberals don't seem to get.

We know liberals are great at lying, they wrote the book on it. But if you're under OATH with a JUDGE, you gotta be honest, for once in your life. Or it can bite you in the ass.
 
You keep saying that but don't offer proof.

Have you obtained new info in the last couple days?

Have you not watched the proceedings? We don't need new info, the old is plenty good enough. She lied, no doubt about it to anyone other than the hard left trump haters.

This is old news:


 
Have you not watched the proceedings? We don't need new info, the old is plenty good enough. She lied, no doubt about it to anyone other than the hard left trump haters.

This is old news:


The cell phone records prove nothing except they were in the same large area.

That is not proof she lied under oath.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top