The War Against Iran is moral patriotic and courageous

[Hafar1014]

The Iranian Hostage Crisis - Short History - Department History - Office of the Historian

history.state.gov 3.0 shell

history.state.gov

On November 4, 1979, Iranian students seized the embassy and detained more than 50 Americans, ranging from the Chargé d’Affaires to the most junior members of the staff, as hostages. The Iranians held the American diplomats hostage for 444 days.

• "Act of War" Definition: An attack on an embassy is legally equated to an attack on the sovereign territory of the country that owns the embassy.
• Historical Precedent: While often treated as a casus belli (justification for war), such attacks have historically led to severe diplomatic crises, targeted retaliation, and regional conflict rather than conventional war.
  
  Iranian Actions: Iran has been accused of targeting foreign embassies, including the 1983 US embassy bombing in Beirut and the 1979 takeover of the US embassy in Tehran. Conversely, Iran has faced, and retaliated against, attacks on its own diplomatic missions (e.g., in Damascus in 2024), which it frames as a violation of its sovereignty.
  Iran has killed over 1000 Americans.
  Iran is building nuclear weapons to use against the United States and any American base in the Middle East
  Iran has used proxies to attack American interests in the Middle East
  Iran has murdered 32000 of its own people
  Iran is a threat to world peace

America is the defender of the free worlds freedom and the main opposition to Communism socialism fascism and violent theocracies.

This war is just and any American who opposes it is a traitor

 

[shockedcanadian]

The Iranian Hostage Crisis - Short History - Department History - Office of the Historian

history.state.gov 3.0 shell

history.state.gov

On November 4, 1979, Iranian students seized the embassy and detained more than 50 Americans, ranging from the Chargé d’Affaires to the most junior members of the staff, as hostages. The Iranians held the American diplomats hostage for 444 days.

• "Act of War" Definition: An attack on an embassy is legally equated to an attack on the sovereign territory of the country that owns the embassy.
• Historical Precedent: While often treated as a casus belli (justification for war), such attacks have historically led to severe diplomatic crises, targeted retaliation, and regional conflict rather than conventional war.
  
  Iranian Actions: Iran has been accused of targeting foreign embassies, including the 1983 US embassy bombing in Beirut and the 1979 takeover of the US embassy in Tehran. Conversely, Iran has faced, and retaliated against, attacks on its own diplomatic missions (e.g., in Damascus in 2024), which it frames as a violation of its sovereignty.
  Iran has killed over 1000 Americans.
  Iran is building nuclear weapons to use against the United States and any American base in the Middle East
  Iran has used proxies to attack American interests in the Middle East
  Iran has murdered 32000 of its own people
  Iran is a threat to world peace

America is the defender of the free worlds freedom and the main opposition to Communism socialism fascism and violent theocracies.

This war is just and any American who opposes it is a traitor

Yes. The problem is that unlike in decades past all of the West is weaker. Their own economies not doing well for the middle class, their own liberties far weaker than in the past, their own dreams out of reach.

Thus, the most popular approach will come from those willing to improve their citizens lives rather than foreign entanglement of any kind. At least with China, Western leaders can argue "we are going to bring jobs back". With Iran, the average citizen says "what does this do for my life here at home"?


This is why the West will eventually lose. It is not the 1980s where the world was open to confronting Russia because their families had good paying jobs, a promise of personal fulfillment and there was mass liberty.

I am just the Messenger, I see what has happened to Canada, one of its victims in fact. The world must confront Iran but it will not be overly popular in many places when their own situation is depressing.

Take note and take heed. There is a real reason the West and Judeo-Christian values are in grave danger of becoming extinct.

 

[scruffy]

Trump is trying to do the free world a favor. We'll see if it wants one.

 

[Oddball]

The Iranian Hostage Crisis - Short History - Department History - Office of the Historian

history.state.gov 3.0 shell

history.state.gov

On November 4, 1979, Iranian students seized the embassy and detained more than 50 Americans, ranging from the Chargé d’Affaires to the most junior members of the staff, as hostages. The Iranians held the American diplomats hostage for 444 days.

• "Act of War" Definition: An attack on an embassy is legally equated to an attack on the sovereign territory of the country that owns the embassy.
• Historical Precedent: While often treated as a casus belli (justification for war), such attacks have historically led to severe diplomatic crises, targeted retaliation, and regional conflict rather than conventional war.
  
  Iranian Actions: Iran has been accused of targeting foreign embassies, including the 1983 US embassy bombing in Beirut and the 1979 takeover of the US embassy in Tehran. Conversely, Iran has faced, and retaliated against, attacks on its own diplomatic missions (e.g., in Damascus in 2024), which it frames as a violation of its sovereignty.
  Iran has killed over 1000 Americans.
  Iran is building nuclear weapons to use against the United States and any American base in the Middle East
  Iran has used proxies to attack American interests in the Middle East
  Iran has murdered 32000 of its own people
  Iran is a threat to world peace

America is the defender of the free worlds freedom and the main opposition to Communism socialism fascism and violent theocracies.

This war is just and any American who opposes it is a traitor

 

[IM2]

Wrong.

Few events in modern Middle Eastern history have left as deep a scar as the coup of August 1953 that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored. For many Iranians, the coup became the symbol of Western betrayal, setting the stage for decades of anti-imperialism and fueling the anger that erupted in the 1979 revolution.

This article examines the coup’s origins, course, and legacy — situating it in the context of Iranian nationalism, Anglo-American oil interests, Cold War strategy, and the long-term resentment it bred.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

I'm sure people like you would tolerate a foreign government removing our president and installing a president they wanted in power.

 

[late]

Wrong.

View attachment 1233172

Few events in modern Middle Eastern history have left as deep a scar as the coup of August 1953 that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored. For many Iranians, the coup became the symbol of Western betrayal, setting the stage for decades of anti-imperialism and fueling the anger that erupted in the 1979 revolution.

This article examines the coup’s origins, course, and legacy — situating it in the context of Iranian nationalism, Anglo-American oil interests, Cold War strategy, and the long-term resentment it bred.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

I'm sure people like you would tolerate a foreign government removing our president and installing a president they wanted in power.

They also don't know we got Iraq to attack Iran to punish them. A war that killed most of a generation of Iranian males. That Trump has attacked them twice while we were supposedly negotiating.

If you were trying to create a forever war, this would be an excellent start.

 

[IM2]

They also don't know we got Iraq to attack Iran to punish them. A war that killed most of a generation of Iranian males. That Trump has attacked them twice while we were supposedly negotiating.

If you were trying to create a forever war, this would be an excellent start.

Yep. And the fact that we hired Saddam to do it, then invented a reason to kill him. Our government has been the world's largest and most well-financed terrorist organization.

 

[Captain Creeper]

Yep. And the fact that we hired Saddam to do it, then invented a reason to kill him. Our government has been the world's largest and most well-financed terrorist organization.

IMGAY supports Iran. No surprise there.

 

[DStar777]

Democrat opposition to the war seems more political now in light of this:

Presidential Candidate Hillary Clinton on Iran Nuclear Agreement

Former Secretary of State and 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton detailed how she would implement and enforce the Iran nuclear agreement if she is elected president. Among her remarks she said she would not hesitate in using military action if needed against Iran after the...

www.c-span.org

Or this:

Kamala Harris says Iran is ‘greatest adversary’ of US

Democratic presidential candidate says preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon is one of her top priorities.

www.aljazeera.com

Two major Democrats, the last two losing candidates, saying that preventing Iran from having nukes is imperative and that military force may have to be used.
.. and remember this?

So Obama justified the bombing of Libya becuz they were some kind of threat.

What's the difference now? Could it be they aren't in charge?

 

[DStar777]

.. and I forgot to include this:

Google Search

Iranian negotiators told U.S. special envoys during failed nuclear talks in February 2026 that Iran possessed approximately 460 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60% purity, an amount they claimed was enough to produce as many as 11 nuclear bombs. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff stated that the Iranian officials were "proud" of their stockpile and "boasted" about evading international oversight protocols.

Trump envoy Steve Witkoff says Iran claimed it had enough enriched uranium to make 11 nuclear bombs

President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff told Fox News that Iranian negotiators said Iran had the "inalienable right to enrich all their nuclear fuel."

www.cbsnews.com

 

[shockedcanadian]

Yep. And the fact that we hired Saddam to do it, then invented a reason to kill him. Our government has been the world's largest and most well-financed terrorist organization.

You should move to Canada then and live in peaceful Utopia! Come on man, join us in our misery!

 

[IM2]

You should move to Canada then and live in peaceful Utopia! Come on man, join us in our misery!

How about you move here and support the unconstitutional government you want us to? The facts are what they are, you foreign POS. We created the problem. Us an the British. The British refuse to fight in this one. Your country refuses to fight. You won't get hit. I live close to a military base. If Iran purchases a dirty nuke and a terrorist decides to blow himself up with it near that base, around 100,000 people, including me, are going to feel the effects. You will be up in Canada barking about how great it is that we are fighting Iran. So what you can do is go **** yourself and keep your foreign ass out of this American conversation.

 

[DStar777]

Wrong.

View attachment 1233172

Few events in modern Middle Eastern history have left as deep a scar as the coup of August 1953 that toppled Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh. In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored. For many Iranians, the coup became the symbol of Western betrayal, setting the stage for decades of anti-imperialism and fueling the anger that erupted in the 1979 revolution.

This article examines the coup’s origins, course, and legacy — situating it in the context of Iranian nationalism, Anglo-American oil interests, Cold War strategy, and the long-term resentment it bred.

The 1953 Coup: Oil, Mosaddegh, and the Roots of Iranian Resentment - Explaining History Podcast

In one decisive episode, a democratically elected leader was removed in a covert Anglo-American operation, foreign powers reasserted control over Iranian oil, and the Shah’s autocracy was restored.

explaininghistory.org

I'm sure people like you would tolerate a foreign government removing our president and installing a president they wanted in power.

The same event.. from a different perspective:

“End States Who Sponsor Terrorism”

The following article appeared as an advertisement in The New York Times on October 02, 2001 . Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001. Fifty years ago, Truman...

ari.aynrand.org

Fifty years ago, Truman and Eisenhower surrendered the West’s property rights in oil, although that oil rightfully belonged to those in the West whose science, technology, and capital made its discovery and use possible. The first country to nationalize Western oil, in 1951, was Iran. The rest, observing our frightened silence, hurried to grab their piece of the newly available loot.

 

[shockedcanadian]

How about you move here and support the unconstitutional government you want us to? The facts are what they are, you foreign POS. We created the problem. Us an the British. The British refuse to fight in this one. Your country refuses to fight. You won't get hit. I live close to a military base. If Iran purchases a dirty nuke and a terrorist decides to blow himself up with it near that base, around 100,000 people, including me, are going to feel the effects. You will be up in Canada barking about how great it is that we are fighting Iran. So what you can do is go **** yourself and keep your foreign ass out of this American conversation.

My foreign ass, lol.

It is funny, one of the Creepy Ones from Canada who is on this site claims I am NOT Canadian. She has called me American, Russian, N Korean, Ugandan and G-d knows what else.

How do I know you are American? You are forcing me to place a great deal of faith in your openness and honesty. How do you know I am NOT American?

Hmmm...

 

[Captain Creeper]

How about you move here and support the unconstitutional government you want us to? The facts are what they are, you foreign POS. We created the problem. Us an the British. The British refuse to fight in this one. Your country refuses to fight. You won't get hit. I live close to a military base. If Iran purchases a dirty nuke and a terrorist decides to blow himself up with it near that base, around 100,000 people, including me, are going to feel the effects. You will be up in Canada barking about how great it is that we are fighting Iran. So what you can do is go **** yourself and keep your foreign ass out of this American conversation.

GODDAMN!!! THAT is the way to tell off a f*cking Canadian!!

 

[BS Filter]

Yep. And the fact that we hired Saddam to do it, then invented a reason to kill him. Our government has been the world's largest and most well-financed terrorist organization.

No one's forcing you to stay here.

 

[BS Filter]

How about you move here and support the unconstitutional government you want us to? The facts are what they are, you foreign POS. We created the problem. Us an the British. The British refuse to fight in this one. Your country refuses to fight. You won't get hit. I live close to a military base. If Iran purchases a dirty nuke and a terrorist decides to blow himself up with it near that base, around 100,000 people, including me, are going to feel the effects. You will be up in Canada barking about how great it is that we are fighting Iran. So what you can do is go **** yourself and keep your foreign ass out of this American conversation.

You're schizophrenic and so are you.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

View attachment 1233174

Did you hear Mark Levin is the leader of MAGA now?

 

[luiza]

This war is just and any American who opposes it is a traitor

Interesting twist .

Naturally it would be unfair to believe that Stealing Oil , Gas and other Reserves on the fake pretext of preventing Iran going Nuclear , is a Fairy story .

Where could we be without simple Gullibles ?

 

[g5000]

The War Against Iran is moral patriotic and courageous​

When are you joining up, you jingoistic goon?