Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She gave a year.Yearti did give dates.
Which means what? Nothing. If he was at her address why would he need to call her?Wade's phone was tracked to Willis' address.
So? Means nothing.They also exchanged 10,000 text messages.
Where is the evidence? Because I text or talk to someone on the phone doesn't prove I am having a sexual relationship. Damn talk about grasping for straws.Not only is that evidence that they were dating, but it contradicts Willis' testimony, under oath, that she and Wade only communicated a couple times a month during that period.
Doesn't matter what I think, you must prove it's a lie.He told Ashleigh Merchant that he did have knowledge of the relationship. One is a lie. Which one do you think it is?
Like I said she isn't going anywhere. Sorry the Trump lawyers failed to reach the burden of proof.Did you see him when he was denying everything, then when he was presented with a copy of the text messages he goes, "Dang!"? He said "dang" because he knew he'd been caught lying under oath.
I predict that in the near future, Bradley (not Brady, my mistake) will have to decide if he wants to be black, or be a lawyer.
They excelled at providing evidence.
Link the lie and link proof it's a lie please.What's the matter with you? Are you just being silly? It's not a close call.
Link the lie and link proof it's a lie please.
Dude we've provided links. Multiple links. You don't want to see it so you just keep asking for more.
Prove he WASN'T sleeping with her. Prove that he didn't go to her house 35 times before she hired him. Prove she didn't benefit from their relationship.
Sorry you have provided no proof she lied.Seems to me that the one who deems links most important have provided the fewest to backup their claims.
The links you provided are not proof she lied.
The simply prove they were within a 3 or 4 miles of each other.
That isn't my job. You can't prove a negative...
Prove you aren't an alien from Saturn in human form. Go ahead. I'll wait.
Sorry you have provided no proof she lied.
What claim did I not back up?
His phone was tracked to her residence, not "3-4 miles of her house." Quit twisting the proven truth to try to fit your narrative.
Translation: Can't prove a negative.Translation: No, I have no proof to back up anything I say so I'll keep playing the game until you finally leave realizing you're arguing with a doorknob.
The above is QAnon Conspiracy Rabbit-Hole Masturbation. IMHOWillis and Wade are the minority faces [along with James and Bragg] that white libs hide behind in case things go south, when/if they do go south Wade and Wilis et. al. will take the hit and you get to play your race card... Jack Smith is the white lib at the top of the liberal legal totem pole whose presence is there to remind the minority contingent what is expected of and from them.
Well, the judge is the judge of that."They lied under oath about it..."
See response to Kelso just above. The one that starts with: " Well, the judge is the judge of that."That's the part that stupid liberals don't seem to get.
His phone was tracked to her residence, not "3-4 miles of her house." Quit twisting the proven truth to try to fit your narrative.
Translation: No, I have no proof to back up anything I say so I'll keep playing the game until you finally leave realizing you're arguing with a doorknob.
It's amazing how you had full faith in the system, as long as, it was screwing over folks of color. Now that the number one white criminal has been caught, you don't like the system anymore.Dude, she HAS to be removed. If she is allowed to stay, half the country will lose faith in our justice system, if they haven't already.
Now click your heelsThe above is QAnon Conspiracy Rabbit-Hole Masturbation. IMHO
And it is a perfect example of why the Trump Squeaky Frommes here are so dissed and dismissed. And, as long as it was surfaced by the earnest poster Frank, it has more than a hint of racist-think. No one need be hyper-sensitive to racism to detect such in the above paragraph by Frank.
This isn't true, cell phone towers do not "track to her residence".
Cell phone towers are omnidirectional. That means they transmit/receive in a 360 degree circle and do not determine direction. They can have an effective range of 3 to 45 miles depending on various electromagnetic variables including strength of the signal, other EM interference, topography, and man made structures to name a few.
Basic geometry says that a radius of 3 miles results in a 28.7 square mile circle. a range of 45 miles is 6361.73 square miles. Now in an urban center the square miles I assume would be toward the lower end. Now think of a Venn Diagram, when two circles overlap (as in the circle of a cell phone tower), then the probable area of overlap becomes a higher probability of general geographic area. However there is no cut and dried overlap between adjacent towers because of the variables already mentioned. In some cases the "overlap" can be large, in other cases the "overlap" could be small. The only way to know is use an EMF Strength Meter and systematically plot reception in a grid patter in the target area.
To establish through ELINT (Electromagnetic Intelligence) that the cell phone was located at her residence you would need:
So the cell phone tower data does not show residence, it shows an area of probability measured in square miles.
- A directional antenna to provide a line of bearing (cell phone towers are omnidirectional, not directional), not omnidirectional antennas.
- A steady state signal
- At least two directional antenna's to provide multiple lines of bearing to establish general location, with 3 being preferred each on a different bearing.
WW
Electronics Warfare Operator
ATC (AW/NAC)
USN, Ret.
View attachment 912187
Dude, you're an idiot.
Google tracks your whereabouts to within a few feet. Long gone are the days when triangulation is used.
How Google uses location information – Privacy & Terms – Google
policies.google.com
How do you track a cellphone to someone's residence?His phone was tracked to her residence, not "3-4 miles of her house." Quit twisting the proven truth to try to fit your narrative.
Translation: No, I have no proof to back up anything I say so I'll keep playing the game until you finally leave realizing you're arguing with a doorknob.
How do you track a cellphone to someone's residence?
Link please.The subpoenaed tracking data shows where it was. It's not rocket science, man.
You really need to shut up immediately and pay attention.Dude, you're an idiot.
Google tracks your whereabouts to within a few feet. So does Apple.
Long gone are the days when triangulation is used.
How Google uses location information – Privacy & Terms – Google
You really need to shut up immediately and pay attention.
The data presented in this hearing. Absolutely. Did not locate people with any more accuracy than a few miles in either direction.
Link please.
No it hasn't.Already done.
The subpoenaed tracking data shows where it was. It's not rocket science, man. If someone steals my phone I can track it anywhere in real time.
