'Big nothing burger': Fani Willis hearing failed to turn up evidence of corruption

[Superbadbrutha]

Yearti did give dates.

She gave a year.

Wade's phone was tracked to Willis' address.

Which means what? Nothing. If he was at her address why would he need to call her?

They also exchanged 10,000 text messages.

So? Means nothing.

Not only is that evidence that they were dating, but it contradicts Willis' testimony, under oath, that she and Wade only communicated a couple times a month during that period.

Where is the evidence? Because I text or talk to someone on the phone doesn't prove I am having a sexual relationship. Damn talk about grasping for straws.

He told Ashleigh Merchant that he did have knowledge of the relationship. One is a lie. Which one do you think it is?

Doesn't matter what I think, you must prove it's a lie.

Did you see him when he was denying everything, then when he was presented with a copy of the text messages he goes, "Dang!"? He said "dang" because he knew he'd been caught lying under oath.

I predict that in the near future, Bradley (not Brady, my mistake) will have to decide if he wants to be black, or be a lawyer.

They excelled at providing evidence.

Like I said she isn't going anywhere. Sorry the Trump lawyers failed to reach the burden of proof.

 

[Catsnmeters]

What's the matter with you? Are you just being silly? It's not a close call.

Link the lie and link proof it's a lie please.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Link the lie and link proof it's a lie please.

Dude we've provided links. Multiple links. You don't want to see it so you just keep asking for more.

Prove he WASN'T sleeping with her. Prove that he didn't go to her house 35 times before she hired him. Prove she didn't benefit from their relationship.

Seems to me that the one who deems links most important have provided the fewest to backup their claims.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Dude we've provided links. Multiple links. You don't want to see it so you just keep asking for more.

The links you provided are not proof she lied.

The simply prove they were within a 3 or 4 miles of each other.

Prove he WASN'T sleeping with her. Prove that he didn't go to her house 35 times before she hired him. Prove she didn't benefit from their relationship.

That isn't my job. You can't prove a negative...

Prove you aren't an alien from Saturn in human form. Go ahead. I'll wait.

Seems to me that the one who deems links most important have provided the fewest to backup their claims.

Sorry you have provided no proof she lied.

What claim did I not back up?

 

[airplanemechanic]

The links you provided are not proof she lied.

The simply prove they were within a 3 or 4 miles of each other.



That isn't my job. You can't prove a negative...

Prove you aren't an alien from Saturn in human form. Go ahead. I'll wait.


Sorry you have provided no proof she lied.

What claim did I not back up?

His phone was tracked to her residence, not "3-4 miles of her house." Quit twisting the proven truth to try to fit your narrative.

Translation: No, I have no proof to back up anything I say so I'll keep playing the game until you finally leave realizing you're arguing with a doorknob.

 

[Catsnmeters]

His phone was tracked to her residence, not "3-4 miles of her house." Quit twisting the proven truth to try to fit your narrative.

Link please.

Translation: No, I have no proof to back up anything I say so I'll keep playing the game until you finally leave realizing you're arguing with a doorknob.

Translation: Can't prove a negative.

 

[Chillicothe]

Willis and Wade are the minority faces [along with James and Bragg] that white libs hide behind in case things go south, when/if they do go south Wade and Wilis et. al. will take the hit and you get to play your race card... Jack Smith is the white lib at the top of the liberal legal totem pole whose presence is there to remind the minority contingent what is expected of and from them.

The above is QAnon Conspiracy Rabbit-Hole Masturbation. IMHO
And it is a perfect example of why the Trump Squeaky Frommes here are so dissed and dismissed. And, as long as it was surfaced by the earnest poster Frank, it has more than a hint of racist-think. No one need be hyper-sensitive to racism to detect such in the above paragraph by Frank.

-----------------------------------------------------

"They lied under oath about it..."

Well, the judge is the judge of that.
But, for the sake of this thread let us so stipulate. They lied about boinkin' each other. So?
Did they lie about Trump's efforts to overturn the lawful election results in Georgia?
Did they lie about Giuliani's lies to the Georgia legislature about fraud? About Fanni and her daughter? Did they lied about Trump's calls to both the Secretary of State and a field election investigator in an attempt to get them to illegally change the results of the 2020 election? Did they lie about the fraudulent 'Electors'?

If their so-called "lies" really did happen, and the judge is the judge of that, but if they did.....and it was only about them boinkin' each other.......as I have read on this very thread ..."Big friggin' deal".

It's not like they committed adultery with a porn star and then paid her off to not tell her story to authorities or to the press prior to an election.


--------------------------------------------------------------

That's the part that stupid liberals don't seem to get.

See response to Kelso just above. The one that starts with: " Well, the judge is the judge of that."
So they screwed each other as consenting adults and then fibbed about it. Folks often do that.
Did they fib about Trump's phone calls and attempt to interfere in the results of the 2020 election? Did they fib about the charges they brought against all 18 co-conspirators?

My point is----- colleagues have sex for many reasons. Colleagues fib about having sex with each other for many reasons too. But, if it is not determinative in their decisions in performing their sworn duties. And THAT has not been proven or even alleged. So big friggin' deal!

Wag your finger at 'em and cluck your tongue if that is your assumed role as the judge of their private behavior.....go for it. You be you.

Others, other adults, will say....'wish you two would've waited.....but continue on with the good work you are doing and be more careful about your sexual lives becoming public.'

 

[WorldWatcher]

His phone was tracked to her residence, not "3-4 miles of her house." Quit twisting the proven truth to try to fit your narrative.

Translation: No, I have no proof to back up anything I say so I'll keep playing the game until you finally leave realizing you're arguing with a doorknob.

This isn't true, cell phone towers do not "track to her residence".

Cell phone towers are omnidirectional. That means they transmit/receive in a 360 degree circle and do not determine direction. They can have an effective range of 3 to 45 miles depending on various electromagnetic variables including strength of the signal, other EM interference, topography, and man made structures to name a few.

Basic geometry says that a radius of 3 miles results in a 28.7 square mile circle. a range of 45 miles is 6361.73 square miles. Now in an urban center the square miles I assume would be toward the lower end. Now think of a Venn Diagram, when two circles overlap (as in the circle of a cell phone tower), then the probable area of overlap becomes a higher probability of general geographic area. However there is no cut and dried overlap between adjacent towers because of the variables already mentioned. In some cases the "overlap" can be large, in other cases the "overlap" could be small. The only way to know is use an EMF Strength Meter and systematically plot reception in a grid patter in the target area.

To establish through ELINT (Electromagnetic Intelligence) that the cell phone was located at her residence you would need:

• A directional antenna to provide a line of bearing (cell phone towers are omnidirectional, not directional), not omnidirectional antennas.
• A steady state signal
• At least two directional antenna's to provide multiple lines of bearing to establish general location, with 3 being preferred each on a different bearing.

So the cell phone tower data does not show residence, it shows an area of probability measured in square miles.

WW
Electronics Warfare Operator
ATC (AW/NAC)
USN, Ret.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Dude, she HAS to be removed. If she is allowed to stay, half the country will lose faith in our justice system, if they haven't already.

It's amazing how you had full faith in the system, as long as, it was screwing over folks of color. Now that the number one white criminal has been caught, you don't like the system anymore.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

The above is QAnon Conspiracy Rabbit-Hole Masturbation. IMHO
And it is a perfect example of why the Trump Squeaky Frommes here are so dissed and dismissed. And, as long as it was surfaced by the earnest poster Frank, it has more than a hint of racist-think. No one need be hyper-sensitive to racism to detect such in the above paragraph by Frank.

Now click your heels

 

[airplanemechanic]

This isn't true, cell phone towers do not "track to her residence".

Cell phone towers are omnidirectional. That means they transmit/receive in a 360 degree circle and do not determine direction. They can have an effective range of 3 to 45 miles depending on various electromagnetic variables including strength of the signal, other EM interference, topography, and man made structures to name a few.

Basic geometry says that a radius of 3 miles results in a 28.7 square mile circle. a range of 45 miles is 6361.73 square miles. Now in an urban center the square miles I assume would be toward the lower end. Now think of a Venn Diagram, when two circles overlap (as in the circle of a cell phone tower), then the probable area of overlap becomes a higher probability of general geographic area. However there is no cut and dried overlap between adjacent towers because of the variables already mentioned. In some cases the "overlap" can be large, in other cases the "overlap" could be small. The only way to know is use an EMF Strength Meter and systematically plot reception in a grid patter in the target area.

To establish through ELINT (Electromagnetic Intelligence) that the cell phone was located at her residence you would need:

• A directional antenna to provide a line of bearing (cell phone towers are omnidirectional, not directional), not omnidirectional antennas.
• A steady state signal
• At least two directional antenna's to provide multiple lines of bearing to establish general location, with 3 being preferred each on a different bearing.

So the cell phone tower data does not show residence, it shows an area of probability measured in square miles.

WW
Electronics Warfare Operator
ATC (AW/NAC)
USN, Ret.

View attachment 912187

Dude, you're an idiot.

Google tracks your whereabouts to within a few feet. So does Apple.

Long gone are the days when triangulation is used.

How Google uses location information – Privacy & Terms – Google

policies.google.com

 

[WorldWatcher]

Dude, you're an idiot.

Google tracks your whereabouts to within a few feet. Long gone are the days when triangulation is used.

How Google uses location information – Privacy & Terms – Google

policies.google.com

Your own link points out that WiFi and GPS provide precise location information.

Which isn’t the question.

The question is does a cell phone omni directional cell tower on their own provide precise location and the answer is no.

And no, I’m not an idiot. I was an avionics and ELINT operator and have an understanding of how RF communication and antennas work.

Funny how you didn’t argue against what I said. You instead called me an idiot, linked to something you found on the web, but actually supports what I said as precise location is a function of GPS.

Ever notice that if you want to use maps for turn by turn directions they need GPS with inputs from internal accelerometers.

WW

 

[Superbadbrutha]

His phone was tracked to her residence, not "3-4 miles of her house." Quit twisting the proven truth to try to fit your narrative.

Translation: No, I have no proof to back up anything I say so I'll keep playing the game until you finally leave realizing you're arguing with a doorknob.

How do you track a cellphone to someone's residence?

 

[airplanemechanic]

How do you track a cellphone to someone's residence?

The subpoenaed tracking data shows where it was. It's not rocket science, man. If someone steals my phone I can track it anywhere in real time.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The subpoenaed tracking data shows where it was. It's not rocket science, man.

Link please.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Dude, you're an idiot.

Google tracks your whereabouts to within a few feet. So does Apple.

Long gone are the days when triangulation is used.

How Google uses location information – Privacy & Terms – Google

policies.google.com

You really need to shut up immediately and pay attention.

The data presented in this hearing. Absolutely. Did not locate people with any more accuracy than a few miles in either direction.

 

[airplanemechanic]

You really need to shut up immediately and pay attention.

The data presented in this hearing. Absolutely. Did not locate people with any more accuracy than a few miles in either direction.

Link? Ya'll seem to be good at asking for them, not so much at providing them.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Link please.

Already provided.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Already done.

No it hasn't.

Not a link that supports the contention they tracked phones to her house specifically.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The subpoenaed tracking data shows where it was. It's not rocket science, man. If someone steals my phone I can track it anywhere in real time.

They didn’t subpoena “tracking data”.

They subpoenaed cell tower data the two are not the same.

WW