Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Big Gubmint IS your church, Scooter.Our ancestors escaped Europe to set up shop over here for that very reason. Is another 1776 moment needed again, to retake individual liberty, that is being eroded under the guise of religious freedom?
Our ancestors escaped Europe to set up shop over here for that very reason. Is another 1776 moment needed again, to retake individual liberty, that is being eroded under the guise of religious freedom?
Our ancestors escaped Europe to set up shop over here for that very reason. Is another 1776 moment needed again, to retake individual liberty, that is being eroded under the guise of religious freedom?
You may have a point there, the Obergefell decision which makes the Radical Episcopalianist doctrine of gay marriage a secular law is a disgrace.
But the Good Lord willing, this atrocity will soon be removed from our law books.
If a couple of punks want to get decked out in wedding dresses and pretend to "get married" in accordance with a radical liberal religion, that's fine with me. But I should not be forced to honor these doctrines as an American.
1. What liberties are being eroded away?Our ancestors escaped Europe to set up shop over here for that very reason. Is another 1776 moment needed again, to retake individual liberty, that is being eroded under the guise of religious freedom?
Pish posh.As I have stated before, Obergfell should have just forced all States to recognize SSM licenses issued in other States, just like they are required to do so now, even if the people don't meet the requirements for a licenses issued in their State.
Can you give some examples of what you are referring to?
IOW, you cannot......You're just howling at the moon.Legislation, and court rulings over the last 40 years, on issues ranging from abortion, employee rights, tax payer funding of religious organizations, and schools, etc.
The list is quite extensive with just the simplest of research efforts. The latest Supreme Court decision just bubbling to the surface.
So I was correct this has more to do with reversing the Roe vs Wade decision which has not been made official as of yet but look like will be reversed.Legislation, and court rulings over the last 40 years, on issues ranging from abortion, employee rights, tax payer funding of religious organizations, and schools, etc.
The list is quite extensive with just the simplest of research efforts. The latest Supreme Court decision just bubbling to the surface.
Pish posh.
End licensing and return marriage to the realm of common law.
Marriage is a legal contract between consenting adults. It's not about religion.You may have a point there, the Obergefell decision which makes the Radical Episcopalianist doctrine of gay marriage a secular law is a disgrace.
But the Good Lord willing, this atrocity will soon be removed from our law books.
If a couple of punks want to get decked out in wedding dresses and pretend to "get married" in accordance with a radical liberal religion, that's fine with me. But I should not be forced to honor these doctrines as an American.
Yes there is....Nothing wrong with government codifying a contract and calling it marriage. Nothing wrong with a State legislature extending that to same sex couples if they do so via legislative action.
All that does is make the power of The State over those holding the license transferable....A license is permission, not a right...It puts the individual in a subservient position, and The State superior.Also precedent shows marriage licenses are transferrable even if you don't meet the requirements in the State you are moving to. THAT would have been a proper decision, but they went with the Roe scorched earth method.
ButMarriage is a legal contract between consenting adults. It's not about religion.
The marriage contract is just registered with the state.Yes there is....
The license circumvents and obviates the contract, in lieu of that state mandated license.
All that does is make the power of The State over those holding the license transferable....A license is permission, not a right...It puts the individual in a subservient position, and The State superior.
Of course not. That's up to the church.But
A Church shouldn’t be forced to Marry someone of the Same Sex unless they are willing to do it…
The left would have it where a Church would be forced to do the ceremony or face State sanctions against it but then make sure a Mosque is not held to the same standard.
So let be clear the left is after a certain segment of society and the OP is known for his hate for anything right of them and is well documented in telling the board he want war…
The marriage contract is just registered with the state.
So you have nothing. LolLegislation, and court rulings over the last 40 years, on issues ranging from abortion, employee rights, tax payer funding of religious organizations, and schools, etc.
The list is quite extensive with just the simplest of research efforts. The latest Supreme Court decision just bubbling to the surface.