Biden's Fatal Mistake?

Bidens other, apparently nonfatal, mistakes

Sexually assaulting Tara Reade
Abusing his office by making Burisma hire Hunter

I bet Dems regret ambushing Kavanaugh now, hilarious how it always comes back to bite them in the ass.
It never sticks, though.

That Larry King video is pretty damning. I read the account of Reade's story as published in the WaPo when it first came out. I was convinced something happened and it was with him. Don't know how far it went but clearly he went over the line with her. Unlike Ford, I don't think she was projecting behavior of others onto him. Too many comments made to others at the time.

His goose is cooked. I had my reservations given this happened 27 years ago but video of her mom calling into the Larry King show at this time asking for advice on whether they should go to the press, that just cooked Joe Biden's goose he's toast.
I was impressed with that clip.

He has had that rep as touchy feely for a long time.

Many of us warned the Dems that Biden had a closet full of skeletons. He'll likely drop out now but had he continued into the general election all those skeletons would have come spilling out into the public. Joe Biden is no Hillary Clinton when it comes to damage control.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he can be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President will be much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his impulsive remark is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out a large majority of potential candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
I guess some people are intimidated by a female candidate
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he can be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President will be much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his impulsive remark is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out a large majority of potential candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...

Could Woodie possibly link us to Biden's mental health issues? Something other than Gateway Pundit, PJ Media or Breitbart if you please.
Don't you listen to his clips?

It's rather obvious.

He's been stuttering his entire life. And we all remember your bogus claims about Hillary. Hell, we could run the healthiest man in the universe and y'all would claim he's got Down Syndrome and terminal cancer Sorry to say, your credibility is shot.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?
It wouldn't be tokenism if he considered both men and women, and then picked a woman.

But if he's only picking from women, that's blatant sexism and if it were a private employer, he could be sued for discrimination.
Perhaps he did consider both sexes, and decided that he would have a better chance of winning by picking a woman.

What is wrong with that?
He hasn't chosen yet. When he made the comment he wasn't even the prospective nominee.

It was nothing but pandering.

I'm a woman and I wouldn't have voted for Hillary under any circumstances. Like MOST women.
A politician pandering? I find that hard to believe.
 
Beijing Biden's mistake was allowing China to wrap their balls on his chin and the Obama Administration's chin, as Obie's point man in China!

WUHAN :WooHooSmileyWave-vi:
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he can be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President will be much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his impulsive remark is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out a large majority of potential candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...

Could Woodie possibly link us to Biden's mental health issues? Something other than Gateway Pundit, PJ Media or Breitbart if you please.
Don't you listen to his clips?

It's rather obvious.

He's been stuttering his entire life. And we all remember your bogus claims about Hillary. Hell, we could run the healthiest man in the universe and y'all would claim he's got Down Syndrome and terminal cancer Sorry to say, your credibility is shot.
It's not the stutter.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?
It wouldn't be tokenism if he considered both men and women, and then picked a woman.

But if he's only picking from women, that's blatant sexism and if it were a private employer, he could be sued for discrimination.
Perhaps he did consider both sexes, and decided that he would have a better chance of winning by picking a woman.

What is wrong with that?
He hasn't chosen yet. When he made the comment he wasn't even the prospective nominee.

It was nothing but pandering.

I'm a woman and I wouldn't have voted for Hillary under any circumstances. Like MOST women.
A politician pandering? I find that hard to believe.
Democrats just do it naturally. It's part of their makeup.
 
Bidens other, apparently nonfatal, mistakes

Sexually assaulting Tara Reade
Abusing his office by making Burisma hire Hunter

I bet Dems regret ambushing Kavanaugh now, hilarious how it always comes back to bite them in the ass.
It never sticks, though.

That Larry King video is pretty damning. I read the account of Reade's story as published in the WaPo when it first came out. I was convinced something happened and it was with him. Don't know how far it went but clearly he went over the line with her. Unlike Ford, I don't think she was projecting behavior of others onto him. Too many comments made to others at the time.

His goose is cooked. I had my reservations given this happened 27 years ago but video of her mom calling into the Larry King show at this time asking for advice on whether they should go to the press, that just cooked Joe Biden's goose he's toast.
I was impressed with that clip.

He has had that rep as touchy feely for a long time.

Many of us warned the Dems that Biden had a closet full of skeletons. He'll likely drop out now but had he continued into the general election all those skeletons would have come spilling out into the public. Joe Biden is no Hillary Clinton when it comes to damage control.
You think? Bill Clinton is the example here.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?

Irrelevant.

Better to choose the best candidate without politically correct limitations, eh?

Of course, no Democrat candidate currently fits the bill.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he can be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President will be much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his impulsive remark is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out a large majority of potential candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...

The fatal mistake to Biden's Presidential bid was declaring himself a candidate to begin with.
 
Joe Biden may have sown up the Democrat nomination for President, but his thoughtless commitment to pick a woman (of color?) has made it much less likely that he could be elected. Because of his age and mental health issues, there will be serious questions about his capacity to serve out one full term as President, much less two. As a result, his choice for Vice President is much more important to voters than in previous elections.,

The problem with his commitment is that he will have reduced the gravity of his choice to that of tokenism. By ruling out all male (and White?) candidates, the person he selects will be scrutinized to a much greater degree than is usual. If it is seen as simply pandering to a particular voting block, the negative effects of this selection may far outweigh the positive.

I have no doubt that the DNC is weighing all of these considerations very carefully. The next four months will be verrry interesting...
Tokenism for the Party that lives on it

Seems appropriate.
Picking a woman to be his running mate is tokenism?

You do realize there are more women in this country than there are men, right?
Then why didn't you nominate one?
 

Forum List

Back
Top