Biden will pack the Supreme Court.

He won’t know it, but his handlers are already setting it up.

Like it fucking matters, elections stolen and no court would at least listen, the only way this country is going to get back on track, is with blood.

tree-of-liberty.png
 
He won’t know it, but his handlers are already setting it up.


Dumb dumb really believes everything broadcast on Faux News. Not only is he a biddable fool, he's out of touch with reality. In a contest for dumbest poster on USMB, he will win it every time. His claim in the title thread has no validity; President Biden seeks unity, but if Moscow Mitch and his band of bitches decide to block every effort by the President and the H. or Rep., that option must be on the table.
 
He won’t know it, but his handlers are already setting it up.


Dumb dumb really believes everything broadcast on Faux News. Not only is he a biddable fool, he's out of touch with reality. In a contest for dumbest poster on USMB, he will win it every time. His claim in the title thread has no validity; President Biden seeks unity, but if Moscow Mitch and his band of bitches decide to block every effort by the President and the H. or Rep., that option must be on the table.
Got anything to refute the facts presented?

Nope?

Run along, Troll.
 
He won’t know it, but his handlers are already setting it up.



I hope Joe packs the supreme court to the ceiling, that's why we sent him to the WH, to do whatever the fuck he wants, HAAA HA HA.... :p :p :p


1611796463107.png
 
He won’t know it, but his handlers are already setting it up.


Dumb dumb really believes everything broadcast on Faux News. Not only is he a biddable fool, he's out of touch with reality. In a contest for dumbest poster on USMB, he will win it every time. His claim in the title thread has no validity; President Biden seeks unity, but if Moscow Mitch and his band of bitches decide to block every effort by the President and the H. or Rep., that option must be on the table.

So, submit to you, or fascism? Dear lord
 
How many you want him to put on the SC?
15 to 25 should do it.
That will only herald a new era of totalitarianism and leftist evil in government. SCOTUS is too powerful as it is twisting the Constitution around and reinterpreting it beyond recognition as an instrument of arms control rather than a bastion of freedom and civil rights.
 
That will only herald a new era of totalitarianism and leftist evil in government. SCOTUS is too powerful as it is twisting the Constitution around and reinterpreting it beyond recognition as an instrument of arms control rather than a bastion of freedom and civil rights.
No it won't.

Only a certain number will be able to rule on any given case, they will be randomly selected.

That way no one side can PREDICT how the Court will rule and push certain cases to them at the "right" time.

Something like this is called fairness.
 
Cool. Then the next Republican adds 50-75.

You morons never think ahead.
Let them do it then.

The more the merrier.

Only about 7 to 13 would be able to rule on any given case anyway.
 
That will only herald a new era of totalitarianism and leftist evil in government. SCOTUS is too powerful as it is twisting the Constitution around and reinterpreting it beyond recognition as an instrument of arms control rather than a bastion of freedom and civil rights.
No it won't.

Only a certain number will be able to rule on any given case, they will be randomly selected.

That way no one side can PREDICT how the Court will rule and push certain cases to them at the "right" time.

Something like this is called fairness.
We could do that now without adding any more justices, literally pick 5 for each case. Did you ever consider that? No, because you DON'T want fairness, you want a lot more liberal justices likely to rule on cases.
 
No it won't.

Only a certain number will be able to rule on any given case, they will be randomly selected.
Nope. You're rolling dice and shuffling a deck of legal cards to decide cases in favor of the vice industry, shifting society and government to the left with abortion and labor unions.
That way no one side can PREDICT how the Court will rule and push certain cases to them at the "right" time.

Something like this is called fairness.
Leftist scientists are studying climate change, the weather may be fair or foul at different times, and the ladies of the court may have a fairer or darker complexion, but otherwise we really don't talk about “fairness” as a substitute for “justice” in a court of law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top