BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
No. Dems we’re still Dems then as now.The Dems were Republicans in those days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Dems we’re still Dems then as now.The Dems were Republicans in those days.
Explain in documented detail, how Biden is destroying the country.As he destroys the country, I think outlawing lynching helps him sleep better at night
View attachment 623020
That's not what I've been reading.Well, minus 440. That’s the true number. Zero.
You nothing of history, to go along with everything else you know nothing about.No. Dems we’re still Dems then as now.
Reading isn’t the problem. Believing bullshit is. You lap it up.That's not what I've been reading.
Well, minus 440. That’s the true number. Zero.
Non-arguments are admissions of failure. You failed.Reading isn’t the problem. Believing bullshit is. You lap it up.
There was almost a sentence there. Sooo close. And of course, you’re wrong again, anyway, despite your illiteracy.You nothing of history, to go along with everything else you know nothing about.
You buying bullshit and sharing it doesn’t constitute an argument either. So, you failed.Non-arguments are admissions of failure. You failed.
Huh? What we do know is back then girls were girls and men were men.The Dems were Republicans in those days.
You can run but you can't hide from history.
Voting Laws Roundup: December 2021
This year’s tidal wave of restrictive voting legislation will continue in 2022.www.brennancenter.org
If it were really bullshit, you would have had the ability to debunk such imaginary bullshit. You don't have that ability. That's why you are nothing but a bull shitter.You buying bullshit and sharing it doesn’t constitute an argument either. So, you failed.
No, it's actually the Brennan Center. You won't be debunking the existence of those bills either, or explaining how they do not hurt minorities abilities to cast their votes.It is YOUR claim that any of those proposals are “voter suppression” efforts. Ergo, you twit, you are the one with the burden of proof. And you haven’t supported your claim at all.
No you didn't. And you don't now.Huh? What we do know is back then girls were girls and men were men.
Nope! Your non-existent argument proves it. Thanks!No. Dems we’re still Dems then as now.
She can't answer. She's also very easy to box in. She'll be running off soon for the coward she is.Does the hate crime law state it’s illegal to call somebody a name?