Biden Lying about COVID and mask wearing..

[colfax_m]

Such as using effectiveness on 3 micron particles, without realizing that coronavirus droplets are much bigger.

Again, This virus survives in dry air..

Hows that screen door working for you on the submarine?

But that’s not how it’s spread from person to person.

 

[meaner gene]

Again, This virus survives in dry air.. This virus is 0.5-1.5 microns in size.

Hows that screen door working for you on the submarine?

The virus has to get into the air in order to aerosolize to that size. Expelled respiratory droplets are 5 - 500 microns. Stop them before they get into the air, by wearing a mask, and you don't have to worry about the 1 micron particles.

 

[meaner gene]

Such as using effectiveness on 3 micron particles, without realizing that coronavirus droplets are much bigger.

Again, This virus survives in dry air..

Hows that screen door working for you on the submarine?

But that’s not how it’s spread from person to person.

Masks work by preventing those droplets from getting into the air.

His argument is that if the infected person doesn't wear a mask, that another person can't protect himself from the coronavirus with a mask.

He says nothing about the effectiveness of an infected person preventing coronavirus from getting into the air if he wears a mask. And some of the smartest people on the planet have been studying that for 50 years, and they conclude that masks block knfected people from causing viral and bacterial spread.

 

[colfax_m]

Biden is not informed about anything to do with COVID-19.

Masks and face coverings are INEFFECTIVE and useless.... (Less than 30%)

Masks are more effective in preventing coronavirus than remdesivir has in fighting it.

Remdesivir: Drug has 'clear-cut' power to fight coronavirus

What is thre measure of "clear-cut power"?

it also shows that remdesivir is not a magic bullet in this context: the overall benefit in survival was 30%."

Remdesivir: Drug has 'clear-cut' power to fight coronavirus

The data on its effect on symptoms comes from a trial of more than 1,000 patients in the US.

www.bbc.com

Remdesiver is useful in patients who have already developed the immune response (cytokine storm) that causes inflammation in the lungs and organs. This drug mimics the virus and makes it unable to replicate. And yes its success rate is about 50% in very sick individuals.

The one you all demonize, HCL and its adjunct A-Zithromycin or Zinc are far more successful when used prior to the Cytokine Storm damaging the organs. In countries that used it early and often they have had a 91% success rate in therapeutically stopping the disease.

Many studies on HCL have been done and most focused on the use AFTER the Cytokine Storm had already done massive damage to the body. If you read the Immunology Today journal you will find that this use was contraindicated after the cytokine storm has started. They used the drug improperly! Its low dose use also kept their medical staff from contracting the disease. The Journal also cited that HCL dosages used for this virus do not cause heart arrhythmia unless there is an underlying chronic heart condition requiring a pace maker.

Most people, even with heart conditions can tolerate this durg in the low dosages used to treat COVID-19.

All you have to do is give hydroxychloroquine to people before you know they’re sick.

Easy!

 

[The Original Tree]

Biden is not informed about anything to do with COVID-19.

Masks and face coverings are INEFFECTIVE and useless.... (Less than 30%) Now Cameltoe Harris is lying her ass off as well...

It's the CHINESE VIRUS not a Trump virus....

These people are despicable liars.

Fear merchants..... We knew that this card was comming... they are bald face liars..

The Entire COVID scam is a scam. Can someone explain to me how the Wuhan Flu is a pandemic when not even 1% of Americans have caught it in the past 12 months and of those who do catch it, the only people who die primarily were in nursing homes that Gov Cuomo sent sick patients in to. 70% of the deaths were like that and the mortality rate for COVID is not even 1/2% if you get it, and you have to already be weak or sick to even succumb that way to it.

Add to the fact the numbers were padded and The Leftist Globalists need a Kick in the Teeth. This is about forcing Globalism and Oppression on people and NOTHING ELSE.

 

[meaner gene]

All you have to do is give hydroxychloroquine to people before you know they’re sick.

Easy!

Trump took it for 14 days, and then his doctor took him off of it for health concerns.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Again, This virus survives in dry air.. This virus is 0.5-1.5 microns in size.

Hows that screen door working for you on the submarine?

The virus has to get into the air in order to aerosolize to that size. Expelled respiratory droplets are 5 - 500 microns. Stop them before they get into the air, by wearing a mask, and you don't have to worry about the 1 micron particles.

That is a reasoned response.. Thank you! The only problem with this is in dryer atmosphere, 10-15% humidity, the expired droplets that go around improperly fitted masks and through cloth face coverings is not caught and due to its decreased weight and size does not fall from the air. It continues to dry and remains afloat as the DHS and CDC labs discovered. 50% of this country has about 10-15% humidity levels routinely as do air conditioned buildings. So you do have to worry about these particles. Very few buildings have 100% air exchange with the outside.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Biden is not informed about anything to do with COVID-19.

Masks and face coverings are INEFFECTIVE and useless.... (Less than 30%)

Masks are more effective in preventing coronavirus than remdesivir has in fighting it.

Remdesivir: Drug has 'clear-cut' power to fight coronavirus

What is thre measure of "clear-cut power"?

it also shows that remdesivir is not a magic bullet in this context: the overall benefit in survival was 30%."

Remdesivir: Drug has 'clear-cut' power to fight coronavirus

The data on its effect on symptoms comes from a trial of more than 1,000 patients in the US.

www.bbc.com

Remdesiver is useful in patients who have already developed the immune response (cytokine storm) that causes inflammation in the lungs and organs. This drug mimics the virus and makes it unable to replicate. And yes its success rate is about 50% in very sick individuals.

The one you all demonize, HCL and its adjunct A-Zithromycin or Zinc are far more successful when used prior to the Cytokine Storm damaging the organs. In countries that used it early and often they have had a 91% success rate in therapeutically stopping the disease.

Many studies on HCL have been done and most focused on the use AFTER the Cytokine Storm had already done massive damage to the body. If you read the Immunology Today journal you will find that this use was contraindicated after the cytokine storm has started. They used the drug improperly! Its low dose use also kept their medical staff from contracting the disease. The Journal also cited that HCL dosages used for this virus do not cause heart arrhythmia unless there is an underlying chronic heart condition requiring a pace maker.

Most people, even with heart conditions can tolerate this durg in the low dosages used to treat COVID-19.

All you have to do is give hydroxychloroquine to people before you know they’re sick.

Easy!

Considering its safety record, its long use, and its low probability of problems and costs, its far better to use it and stop the disease progression in its tracks. And for the record, those patients were confirmed cases of COVID-19 not your pie in the sky BS.

 

[meaner gene]

The Entire COVID scam is a scam. Can someone explain to me how the Wuhan Flu is a pandemic when not even 1% of Americans have caught it in the past 12 months ...

What about ebola, wold you rated it by the total number of cases or the danger of the virus? Worldwide number of cases were 28,616 . Out of over 6 billion people.

Was ebola a hoax, since less than 0.0005% of the population got it.

 

[Billy_Bob]

All you have to do is give hydroxychloroquine to people before you know they’re sick.

Easy!

Trump took it for 14 days, and then his doctor took him off of it for health concerns.

LOL...

No. Trump was exposed to COVID-19. He was prophylacticly given it to stop the disease progression should he have contracted it. After 14 days and a test it showed he had no illness so it was stopped.

Get your story straight.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The Entire COVID scam is a scam. Can someone explain to me how the Wuhan Flu is a pandemic when not even 1% of Americans have caught it in the past 12 months ...

What about ebola, wold you rated it by the total number of cases or the danger of the virus? Worldwide number of cases were 28,616 . Out of over 6 billion people.

Was ebola a hoax, since less than 0.0005% of the population got it.

Ebola has a very closed mode of transmission. You had to come into contact with blood or body fluids to contract it. Very different than COVID where residual virus shedding (airborn and hands) can cause illness.

 

[meaner gene]

That is a reasoned response.. Thank you! The only problem with this is in dryer atmosphere, 10-15% humidity, the expired droplets that go around improperly fitted masks and through cloth face coverings is not caught ...

Actually face masks, paper / cloth etc are remarkably effective at stopping expelled droplets, since in the act of "getting around" the mask they get caught as the expelled air has to reverse direction.

The effectiveness of paper and cloth surgical masks has been studied for years, and their effectiveness at stopping respiratory viruses and bacteria has been proved.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Such as using effectiveness on 3 micron particles, without realizing that coronavirus droplets are much bigger.

Again, This virus survives in dry air..

Hows that screen door working for you on the submarine?

But that’s not how it’s spread from person to person.

LOL

This virus will go deep into your lungs in this case. Tell me again the most deadly place for this virus to lodge? Deep in the lungs..

 

[airplanemechanic]

For the uninformed:

Still Confused About Masks? Hereâs the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

And I counter that with this:

https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article240780786.html

And this:

Masks Prevent You From Infecting Others With Coronavirus, But May Not Protect You From Being Infected

Wearing a mask helps prevent transmission of COVID-19.

www.forbes.com

"Even if there are cases next door, the answer is no, you do NOT need to get or wear any face masks—surgical masks, “N95 masks,” respirator masks, or anything else—to protect yourself against the coronavirus. Not only do you not need them, you shouldn’t wear them, according to infection prevention specialist Eli Perencevich, MD, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at the University of Iowa’s College of Medicine.

“The average healthy person does not need to have a mask, and they shouldn’t be wearing masks,” Dr. Perencevich said. “There’s no evidence that wearing masks on healthy people will protect them. They wear them incorrectly, and they can increase the risk of infection because they’re touching their face more often.”



So whatcha gonna do?

 

[Billy_Bob]

That is a reasoned response.. Thank you! The only problem with this is in dryer atmosphere, 10-15% humidity, the expired droplets that go around improperly fitted masks and through cloth face coverings is not caught ...

Actually face masks, paper / cloth etc are remarkably effective at stopping expelled droplets, since in the act of "getting around" the mask they get caught as the expelled air has to reverse direction.

The effectiveness of paper and cloth surgical masks has been studied for years, and their effectiveness at stopping respiratory viruses and bacteria has been proved.

The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.

COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE

This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.

www.cdc.gov

 

[meaner gene]

No. Trump was exposed to COVID-19. He was prophylacticly given it to stop the disease progression should he have contracted it. After 14 days and a test it showed he had no illness so it was stopped.

Get your story straight.

Trump was never exposed to COVID-19. That's why he said he doesn't have to wear a mask. Everybody who gets near him gets the rapid 15 minute test, as confirmed by the many such results.

Rep. Louie Gohmert tests positive for coronavirus

If you claim Trump was exposed, who was it that exposed him? I can't find any of that reported.

 

[Billy_Bob]

For the uninformed:

Still Confused About Masks? Hereâs the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus

We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.

www.ucsf.edu

And I counter that with this:

https://www.sacbee.com/news/nation-world/national/article240780786.html

And this:

Masks Prevent You From Infecting Others With Coronavirus, But May Not Protect You From Being Infected

Wearing a mask helps prevent transmission of COVID-19.

www.forbes.com

"Even if there are cases next door, the answer is no, you do NOT need to get or wear any face masks—surgical masks, “N95 masks,” respirator masks, or anything else—to protect yourself against the coronavirus. Not only do you not need them, you shouldn’t wear them, according to infection prevention specialist Eli Perencevich, MD, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at the University of Iowa’s College of Medicine.

“The average healthy person does not need to have a mask, and they shouldn’t be wearing masks,” Dr. Perencevich said. “There’s no evidence that wearing masks on healthy people will protect them. They wear them incorrectly, and they can increase the risk of infection because they’re touching their face more often.”



So whatcha gonna do?

I laughed my asss off when Biden said everyone should wear them OUT DOORS... If your 12' from people out doors and in the sun the chances you will get this virus are next to zero. In fact, healthy people get URI (Upper Respiratory Infections) from wearing masks and if you dont clean the mask a bacterial infection could kill you.

 

[meaner gene]

Ebola has a very closed mode of transmission. You had to come into contact with blood or body fluids to contract it. Very different than COVID where residual virus shedding (airborn and hands) can cause illness.

Yet Trump (private citizen) said that Obama was negligent because he didn't close down air travel from the infected african countries. Republicans predicted millions of ebola cases unless Obama shut down air travel.

And once more republicans were completely wrong when it came to infectious disease.

 

[Billy_Bob]

No. Trump was exposed to COVID-19. He was prophylacticly given it to stop the disease progression should he have contracted it. After 14 days and a test it showed he had no illness so it was stopped.

Get your story straight.

Trump was never exposed to COVID-19. That's why he said he doesn't have to wear a mask. Everybody who gets near him gets the rapid 15 minute test, as confirmed by the many such results.

Rep. Louie Gohmert tests positive for coronavirus

If you claim Trump was exposed, who was it that exposed him? I can't find any of that reported.

Trump had several people test positive that were in close contact with him. I suggest you go back to when he was perscribed this and look back about a week. Several of his inner staff tested positive.

 

[meaner gene]

The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.

COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE

This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.

www.cdc.gov

The first case I clicked on

Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks - PubMed

We identified seasonal human coronaviruses, influenza viruses and rhinoviruses in exhaled breath and coughs of children and adults with acute respiratory illness. Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Abstract
We identified seasonal human coronaviruses, influenza viruses and rhinoviruses in exhaled breath and coughs of children and adults with acute respiratory illness. Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols, with a trend toward reduced detection of coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets. Our results indicate that surgical face masks could prevent transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza viruses from symptomatic individuals.