frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 55,895
- 15,894
- 2,180
Yes, I think the government can't find out people who don't want to be found. They couldn't find me.You think the government canāt find out who people are on message boards?
Heās not silencing them. They are free to report anything they want. There is no right to be in the White House press room and if he thinks news agencies are going to report him inaccurately, or unfairly, he can prevent them from being there.
if Fox or a right wing news agency didnāt same thing to a democrat president and he removed them, Iād say the same thing.
Agreed, and if they harass someone, then that can be dealt with as it is intentional and malicious.
That would have a negative impact on someone.
Harassment is against the law.
Who decides this? Republicans? Democrats?
Well, I donāt control what other people do. As I said, incitement is a slippery slope slope with me because at the end of the day, itās just a suggestion, the person hearing it has full capacity to not listen to them, but I get in the heat of the moment it can cause an emotional response so, who knows.
So I could see incitement as being something they couldnāt charge people over.
And opening that can of worms will lead to those things being encroached upon more and more as time goes on.
what one finds to be āharassingā today might be different than what someone finds harassing 10 years from now
But the point of this thread is about the government setting up a system of age verification. It's about the government putting in place something that forces you to identify yourself or not.
Yes, he's silencing them. They can report whatever they want, but they can't ask questions of their own government. The questions being asked are ones the government wants. Which is not really what happens in a free society.
Laws exist and many laws step on fine lines. That's the job of Congress to write good laws.