Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nobody who tested positive subsequently had contact with Trump.\
Trump had several people test positive that were in close contact with him. I suggest you go back to when he was perscribed this and look back about a week. Several of his inner staff tested positive.
Surgical masks..... Which the general public have no access to.... Try again.. Go further and you will find tha cloth face covering give little or no protections.The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.
COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE
This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.www.cdc.gov
The first case I clicked on
Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks - PubMed
We identified seasonal human coronaviruses, influenza viruses and rhinoviruses in exhaled breath and coughs of children and adults with acute respiratory illness. Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols...pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Abstract
We identified seasonal human coronaviruses, influenza viruses and rhinoviruses in exhaled breath and coughs of children and adults with acute respiratory illness. Surgical face masks significantly reduced detection of influenza virus RNA in respiratory droplets and coronavirus RNA in aerosols, with a trend toward reduced detection of coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets. Our results indicate that surgical face masks could prevent transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza viruses from symptomatic individuals.
If only there were good data about it stopping the disease. Preventative trials failed in large placebo controlled studies, specifically at University of Minnesota being one of the first and largest.Considering its safety record, its long use, and its low probability of problems and costs, its far better to use it and stop the disease progression in its tracks. And for the record, those patients were confirmed cases of COVID-19 not your pie in the sky BS.All you have to do is give hydroxychloroquine to people before you know they’re sick.Remdesiver is useful in patients who have already developed the immune response (cytokine storm) that causes inflammation in the lungs and organs. This drug mimics the virus and makes it unable to replicate. And yes its success rate is about 50% in very sick individuals.Biden is not informed about anything to do with COVID-19.
Masks and face coverings are INEFFECTIVE and useless.... (Less than 30%)
Masks are more effective in preventing coronavirus than remdesivir has in fighting it.
Remdesivir: Drug has 'clear-cut' power to fight coronavirus
What is thre measure of "clear-cut power"?
it also shows that remdesivir is not a magic bullet in this context: the overall benefit in survival was 30%."
Remdesivir: Drug has 'clear-cut' power to fight coronavirus
The data on its effect on symptoms comes from a trial of more than 1,000 patients in the US.www.bbc.com
The one you all demonize, HCL and its adjunct A-Zithromycin or Zinc are far more successful when used prior to the Cytokine Storm damaging the organs. In countries that used it early and often they have had a 91% success rate in therapeutically stopping the disease.
Many studies on HCL have been done and most focused on the use AFTER the Cytokine Storm had already done massive damage to the body. If you read the Immunology Today journal you will find that this use was contraindicated after the cytokine storm has started. They used the drug improperly! Its low dose use also kept their medical staff from contracting the disease. The Journal also cited that HCL dosages used for this virus do not cause heart arrhythmia unless there is an underlying chronic heart condition requiring a pace maker.
Most people, even with heart conditions can tolerate this durg in the low dosages used to treat COVID-19.
Easy!
LOLBut that’s not how it’s spread from person to person.Again, This virus survives in dry air..Such as using effectiveness on 3 micron particles, without realizing that coronavirus droplets are much bigger.
Hows that screen door working for you on the submarine?
This virus will go deep into your lungs in this case. Tell me again the most deadly place for this virus to lodge? Deep in the lungs..
The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.
COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE
This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Surgical masks are those common paper or single layer cloth masks that everybody is wearing.Surgical masks..... Which the general public have no access to.... Try again.. Go further and you will find tha cloth face covering give little or no protections.. Our results indicate that surgical face masks could prevent transmission of human coronaviruses and influenza viruses from symptomatic individuals.
You can see a virus? Trump can see the virus? He was given it prophylacticly to prevent illness after it was suspected he had come in contact with it.Nobody who tested positive subsequently had contact with Trump.\
Trump had several people test positive that were in close contact with him. I suggest you go back to when he was perscribed this and look back about a week. Several of his inner staff tested positive.
Trumps only contacts were with people BEFORE they were tested positive, and everybody gets tested BEFORE allowed near Trump.
The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.Actually face masks, paper / cloth etc are remarkably effective at stopping expelled droplets, since in the act of "getting around" the mask they get caught as the expelled air has to reverse direction.That is a reasoned response.. Thank you! The only problem with this is in dryer atmosphere, 10-15% humidity, the expired droplets that go around improperly fitted masks and through cloth face coverings is not caught ...
The effectiveness of paper and cloth surgical masks has been studied for years, and their effectiveness at stopping respiratory viruses and bacteria has been proved.
COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE
This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
BS... Lying bastard!The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.
COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE
This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.
You lying bastard. I read the reports and they say the exact opposite.
Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2 - PubMed
The surge of patients in the pandemic of COVID-19 caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 may overwhelm the medical systems of many countries. Mask-wearing and handwashing can slow the spread of the virus, but currently, masks are in shortage in many countries, and timely handwashing is often...
N95 masks, medical masks, and homemade masks made of four-layer kitchen paper and one-layer cloth could block 99.98%, 97.14%, and 95.15% of the virus in aerosols.
Homemade paper and cloth masks block 95.15%
Nobody who tested positive subsequently had contact with Trump.
Trumps only contacts were with people BEFORE they were tested positive, and everybody gets tested BEFORE allowed near Trump.
You can see a virus? Trump can see the virus? He was given it prophylacticly to prevent illness after it was suspected he had come in contact with it.
Believe what you want but the facts are clear.
The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.
COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE
This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.
Buddy, you should have read the studies you quoted.
"Filtration efficiencies of the hybrids (such as cotton-silk, cotton-chiffon, cotton-flannel) was >80% (for particles <300 nm) and >90% (for particles >300 nm). "
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks - PubMed
The emergence of a pandemic affecting the respiratory system can result in a significant demand for face masks. This includes the use of cloth masks by large sections of the public, as can be seen during the current global spread of COVID-19. However, there is limited knowledge available on the...
. Randomized trials in community settings found possibly no difference between N95 versus surgical masks and probably no difference between surgical versus no mask in risk for influenza or influenza-like illness, but compliance was low.
Every one of the studies found this.. Read them.. The findings are not supported by the facts.. Why is that?. Randomized trials in community settings found possibly no difference between N95 versus surgical masks and probably no difference between surgical versus no mask in risk for influenza or influenza-like illness, but compliance was low.
Your own post was based on a study with LOW COMPLIANCE, findsing little difference.
Every one of the studies found this.. Read them.. The findings are not supported by the facts.. Why is that?
Buddy, you should have read the studies you quoted.
"Filtration efficiencies of the hybrids (such as cotton-silk, cotton-chiffon, cotton-flannel) was >80% (for particles <300 nm) and >90% (for particles >300 nm).
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks - PubMed
The emergence of a pandemic affecting the respiratory system can result in a significant demand for face masks. This includes the use of cloth masks by large sections of the public, as can be seen during the current global spread of COVID-19. However, there is limited knowledge available on the...
Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2 - PubMed
The surge of patients in the pandemic of COVID-19 caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 may overwhelm the medical systems of many countries. Mask-wearing and handwashing can slow the spread of the virus, but currently, masks are in shortage in many countries, and timely handwashing is often...
N95 masks, medical masks, and homemade masks made of four-layer kitchen paper and
one-layer cloth could block 99.98%, 97.14%, and 95.15% of the virus in aerosols.
Homemade paper and cloth masks block 95.15%
Every one of the studies found this.. Read them.. The findings are not supported by the facts.. Why is that?
The DHS/CDC lab disagrees... As do I. Go to the studies at the bottom of the page and read them individually. Each of them states the upper bounds of effectiveness do not pass 30%.
COVID-19 ARCHIVED WEBPAGE
This historical page is not up to date. Find the latest on COVID-19.
If the Pope were Jewish he would not be Pope. My assumption is that it is an effective 3M mask. My cloth American face mask that I wear to trigger leftists is just for optics.N-95 masks capture about 95%-98% of incoming virus load. IF the seal is improper they are just as useless as a face covering.Masks unless real ones made by 3M are useless. Good for optics. We are fat and more susceptible than other countries. Instead of wearing Masks we should be eating better and exercising.Yes, but that’s all you do. Surface level. Nothing further. You’re not making an argument do much as you’re making an excuse to believe what you already had decided to believe.And I quote those who disagree.
Your ok with BLM and ANTIFA being exempt from their demands? We all know rioters dont get this virus.... Right?Another Moron thread insulting women and whining about something. This time, Trump Virus. Pretty please don't call Trump virus Trump virus.
Still spreading bullshit, just like Biden?The article doesn't Cite real data on masks. They use talking points and nothing more. Tell me how a screen door with 2 foot screen stops a basket ball? It cant.. This is what stopping a 0.5 micron virus is to a 10-20 micron mesh. It cant stop shit!I mean, that article is infectious disease MD and a PhD epidemiologist from one of the best medical institutions in the country.A moron who doesnt know the first thing about a mask or how effective it is....For the uninformed:
Still Confused About Masks? Hereâs the Science Behind How Face Masks Prevent Coronavirus
We talked to UCSF epidemiologist George Rutherford, MD, and infectious disease specialist Peter Chin-Hong, MD, about the CDC’s reversal on mask-wearing, the current science on how masks work, and what to consider when choosing a mask.www.ucsf.edu
But you took a weekend course in donning and doffing military equipment so I guess that is superior?
Biden is not informed about anything to do with COVID-19.
Masks and face coverings are INEFFECTIVE and useless.... (Less than 30%) Now Cameltoe Harris is lying her ass off as well...
It's the CHINESE VIRUS not a Trump virus....
These people are despicable liars.
Fear merchants..... We knew that this card was comming... they are bald face liars..Biden wants to keep America shut down until after the election.
Biden calls for mandate requiring all Americans to wear masks
Former Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday called for a nationwide mask mandate to help fight the spread of the coronavirus pandemic.www.foxnews.com
