Biden DOJ Sides with Porn Industry's Lawsuit Against Texas's Age Verification Law

[IM2]

Freedom of speech and expression, bitches!

 

[Independent thinker]

Gun buyers should have to take a drug test and the ones who leave their guns in their vehicle overnight for non-law-abiders to steal, should be permanently banned from owning one. The FBI stats tell us that 40,000 are stolen from vehicles every year, but unfortunately, we`re up against the gun/criminal lobby. Nation`s Real Ayeholes, aka the NRA gets funding from the gun manufacturers.

People steal guns from cars, homes, gun stores, and everywhere else. In fact, when a felon is caught possessing a gun he shouldn't have, Democrats let them right back out yet again to steal more guns.

 

[pknopp]

Why are adults who view porn afraid of ID verification?

Why are adults who own guns afraid to register them?

 

[Rawley]

Because they demand the state do what they can’t.

Huh? Parent's can't force purveyors of porn to have age verification on the sites they operate, so they are incompetent? WTF?

All of which is pointless.

It's "pointless" to try and limit kid's access to porn? Again, WTF?

 

[hadit]

A 15 year old goes into the store to buy alcohol. He is unable to provide proof of age so he leaves empty handed.

With this it will still be easy for kids to get around the law. There are sites not actually porn sites that have porn on them. There are sites off shore that will still allow access.

Back a few years ago Craigslist got concerned over meet up posts on their boards. They banned them. People just kinda sorta hid what they they were looking for while everyone understood what they were looking for and other sites simply opened to cover the issue.

Just as I noted earlier concerning TikTok. Kids didn't care, they simply moved to the next Chinese sites to post their video's.

So, we go a step further and require some kind of ID to enter an adult web site. The thing is this issue needs to be thrashed out in the legal system because we need to allow adults the maximum amount of freedom while providing protection for kids.

 

[Rawley]

Why are adults who own guns afraid to register them?

How is that analogous to a commercial porn site having age verification technology to prevent kids gaining access to their porn?

 

[Marener]

It's "pointless" to try and limit kid's access to porn? Again, WTF?

This law is pointless because it won’t limit anything.

 

[Marener]

Huh? Parent's can't force purveyors of porn to have age verification on the sites they operate, so they are incompetent? WTF?

Parents can’t install software on their devices to filter adult content so they’re forcing companies to do it for them.

 

[Rawley]

This law is pointless because it won’t limit anything.

Of course it will.

 

[Marener]

Of course it will.

How?

 

[pknopp]

Parents can’t install software on their devices to filter adult content so they’re forcing companies to do it for them.

Parent's can. They just think it's "difficult" for them to do and follow up on. So they look to the nanny state.

 

[hadit]

Turning off WiFi and going to cellular data isn't bypassing the school filters.

WW

That's not what he did.

 

[Marener]

Parent's can. They just think it's "difficult" for them to do and follow up on. So they look to the nanny state.

Yep. Because they’re incompetent.

Better yet, don’t give kids iPads. Maybe spend some time with them instead.

 

[hadit]

Parent's can. They just think it's "difficult" for them to do and follow up on. So they look to the nanny state.

When the kids are at school, it's on the government to protect them.

 

[Hellokitty]

Why are adults who own guns afraid to register them?

Are people claiming access to porn for self defense?

 

[pknopp]

When the kids are at school, it's on the government to protect them.

It's still the parents obligation to monitor what is going on. But schools have filters.

 

[hadit]

Yep. Because they’re incompetent.

Better yet, don’t give kids iPads. Maybe spend some time with them instead.

That's a great idea. I can't think of a single reason to oppose it.

 

[Rawley]

Parents can’t install software on their devices to filter adult content so they’re forcing companies to do it for them.

The law does require companies to "install software on" anyone's devices.

 

[hadit]

It's still the parents obligation to monitor what is going on. But schools have filters.

Schools typically don't provide parents with their kids' browsing history while they're at school. Maybe they should.

 

[Marener]

The law does require companies to "install software on" anyone's devices.

Okay.