Biden DOJ Sides with Porn Industry's Lawsuit Against Texas's Age Verification Law

Porn Hub is currently black in Texas, but 17 other online porn sites are operational as usual. I also can guess that the laws that be have never heard of Tor.
Pornhub itself disabled access from Texas
 
People steal guns from cars, homes, gun stores, and everywhere else. In fact, when a felon is caught possessing a gun he shouldn't have, Democrats let them right back out yet again to steal more guns.
Democrats have that kind of power in our Red States? :auiqs.jpg:
40,000 are stolen every year from vehicles locked and unlocked. Do people need to walk through gun detectors to enter schools and sporting events in other countries?
Your accusation regarding Democrats is idiotic, at best. How many people would be in jail if we didn`t have the 2nd amendment? Other countries have minorities that are poor and ignorant, but they don`t give them guns. Independent thinking is not working well for you.
 
We've not made what you noted illegal.
You can't even demonstrate in public areas without a permit, at least in some places. It's regulated, and I refuse to believe the police would not be there, dispersing the crowd. I refuse to believe you could obtain a permit to hold a KKK rally on the steps of a school building while kids are in class.
 
Gun buyers should have to take a drug test and the ones who leave their guns in their vehicle overnight for non-law-abiders to steal, should be permanently banned from owning one. The FBI stats tell us that 40,000 are stolen from vehicles every year, but unfortunately, we`re up against the gun/criminal lobby. Nation`s Real Ayeholes, aka the NRA gets funding from the gun manufacturers.

You don't believe that. Your party believes illegally buying and illegally owning a gun isn't a crime worth prosecuting. Joe Biden just declared that to the entire world.
 
You can't even demonstrate in public areas without a permit, at least in some places.

Yes you can. Authoritarians want you to believe you can't but you can.


It's regulated, and I refuse to believe the police would not be there, dispersing the crowd. I refuse to believe you could obtain a permit to hold a KKK rally on the steps of a school building while kids are in class.

No permit needed.
 
It's in the spirit of it, isn't it? You seem to be delicate over the KKK expressing themselves freely in public as the first amendment allows but are OK with children going to schools named after Robert E Lee. It calls into question the veracity or your argument. Kind of seems this is just personal instead of any coherent and consistent political belief.
A name on a building is not the same as a loudmouth with a bullhorn spreading hate speech to children, most people understand.
 
A name on a building is not the same as a loudmouth with a bullhorn spreading hate speech to children, most people understand.

Both legal and both head scratchers as to why anyone would want to.
 
Yes you can. Authoritarians want you to believe you can't but you can.




No permit needed.
I'd like to see the response if somebody tries it. If the police didn't show up and disperse it, I would be extremely shocked. And, according to what you just said, they would be acting illegally.
 
A name on a building is not the same as a loudmouth with a bullhorn spreading hate speech to children, most people understand.
No, it's worse. One is just a loud mouth exercising his individual right to be a loud mouth and the other is government sponsored bigotry.
 
No, it's worse. One is just a loud mouth exercising his individual right to be a loud mouth and the other is government sponsored bigotry.
You're not making a strong logical argument. If you would prefer a KKK rally directed at children over a name on a building, I can't help you.
 
I'd like to see the response if somebody tries it. If the police didn't show up and disperse it, I would be extremely shocked. And, according to what you just said, they would be acting illegally.

Cities have been sued and lost many cases where they interfered with the people's rights.
 
Democrats have that kind of power in our Red States? :auiqs.jpg:
40,000 are stolen every year from vehicles locked and unlocked. Do people need to walk through gun detectors to enter schools and sporting events in other countries?
Your accusation regarding Democrats is idiotic, at best. How many people would be in jail if we didn`t have the 2nd amendment? Other countries have minorities that are poor and ignorant, but they don`t give them guns. Independent thinking is not working well for you.
Thanks for admitting that they are doing it in blue states and blue cities in red states.
 
They argued back when the Supreme Court tossed this before that it's up to the parents to monitor kids, not the state's.

As noted, some clamor for a nanny state.
Dems desperately want kids exposed to sexual content .. and when it comes to parents monitoring kids the Dems are the 1 st to condemn parents that want sexually explicit material out of school libraries ..
 
Cities have been sued and lost many cases where they interfered with the people's rights.
Would the police be acting illegally if they dispersed a bunch of KKK members who showed up uninvited and unannounced at a school's front door and started shouting whatever poison they spew at the children inside?
 
15th post
Would the police be acting illegally if they dispersed a bunch of KKK members who showed up uninvited and unannounced at a school's front door and started shouting whatever poison they spew at the children inside?

I imagine they would be ushered from in front of the door just like anyone else would. But that you have to go to these extreme cases where it's not even in question simply means your hair is on fire.
 
Dems desperately want kids exposed to sexual content .. and when it comes to parents monitoring kids the Dems are the 1 st to condemn parents that want sexually explicit material out of school libraries ..
They also like to criticize parents who homeschool their kids to provide more protection from the worst of society. IOW, taking the responsibility that we hear is all theirs.
 
You're not making a strong logical argument. If you would prefer a KKK rally directed at children over a name on a building, I can't help you.
I don't prefer anything I'm just pointing out the fact that one person exercising their right to free speech with bigotry while bad isn't as bad as voters maintaing state sponsored bigotry through their democratic vote. In Virginia for instance the Republicans in office are changing the names of schools back to their Confederate names after they were changed. What seems worse to you from the perspective of a black kid who has to go to one of those schools? One or a handful of clowns outside being bigots or the governor and state assembly supporting the Confederacy and forcing you to go to school named in honor of one?
 
Would the police be acting illegally if they dispersed a bunch of KKK members who showed up uninvited and unannounced at a school's front door and started shouting whatever poison they spew at the children inside?
That doesn't have anything to do with them being KKK members and with them not having any business with the school. They'll turn away anyone who doesn't have business at the school. If a KKK member was a parent of a child going to that school then they couldn't be denied access. Bigots get to have their kids attend public schools too. :itsok:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom