BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 44,149
- 27,250
- 2,615
Rule of law. Remember?Freedom of speech protects speech we don’t like. Deal with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rule of law. Remember?Freedom of speech protects speech we don’t like. Deal with it.
That’s a dumb thing to say.So you only agree with laws that existed at the time of the Founding Fathers. Everything since then is not legitimate.
Good to know...
That’s a dumb thing to say.
In this case, the law clearly violates the first amendment.
The constitution wins.Rule of law. Remember?
Conservatives have been doing it for decades.So you're ok with ignoring laws you think violate constitutional principles.
Good to know...
Conservatives have been doing it for decades.
Why don't take your argument to the Supreme Court and see what happens.The constitution wins.
Example please.Conservatives have been doing it for decades.
I believe in free speech.So you're a conservative.
Good to know...
Are you dense? You cant do that in front of a judges home. Its illegal. Are you just picking and choosing which crimes are punishable?Protesting on public property is protected by the first amendment.
They have a conflict of interest, don’t they.Why don't take your argument to the Supreme Court and see what happens.
I know they wrote a law against it.Are you dense? You cant do that in front of a judges home. Its illegal. Are you just picking and choosing which crimes are punishable?
Wait, i thought you guys wanted to prosecute Trump for telling people to riot.I believe in free speech.
It's the law. Period. End of story. Your double standard is illegal.They have a conflict of interest, don’t they.
Oh good, then you dont have a problem with anything Trump has ever said, criminally speaking.I know they wrote a law against it.
That law is plainly unconstitutional.
I don’t believe in authoritarian fascist laws.
It used to be the law that black kids couldnt go to school with white kids.It's the law. Period. End of story.
Incitement and threats of violent have a long history of being illegal in common law. Our founders knew this.Wait, i thought you guys wanted to prosecute Trump for telling people to riot.
Correct. However, it's still against the law to protest in front of a Supreme Court Justice's home. Too bad.It used to be the law that black kids couldnt go to school with white kids.
Yet, you ignore the incitement and threats directed at people you oppose.Incitement and threats of violent have a long history of being illegal in common law. Our founders knew this.
You can follow your little fascist laws. I’ll follow the constitution.Correct. However, it's still against the law to protest in front of a Supreme Court Justice's home. Too bad.