Biden DOJ admits they haven't prosecuted a single person for illegally protesting outside SCOTUS justices' homes

[j-mac]

And a sidewalk is still a public walkway whether it's in front of a public building or a private building. Rights don't change just because of an adjacent building.

Would you like to have seen your assassin succeed?

 

[JoeB131]

You would last maybe a week without rural people, and they'd shake their heads at your stupidity and arrogance while watching you go up in smoke as the cities burned.

Bullshit. Rural people aren't even doing most of the work on farms anymore... they bring in Mexicans for that, then complain about the Mexicans.

 

[JoeB131]

Would you like to have seen your assassin succeed?

Here's the problem, Anger Issues. This assassin was ONLY a problem because he couldn't get mental health treatment, but he had no problem getting a gun.

Fortunately for all involved, he turned himself in before he hurt anyone.

Now, how about this for a crazy idea. Let's make it HARD for crazy people to get guns, and EASY for them to get mental health treatment!

 

[Batcat]

There's a very clearly worded law (18 U.S. Code § 1507) that prohibits these protests, and Joe Biden's administration has effectively told terrorists like the one who tried to murder Brett Kavanaugh that they are free to break that law without repercussions.

Democrats beleive in selective enforcement of the law. Liberals, illegal aliens and high ranking Democrats are to be treated leniently while conservatives and especially Trump supporters are to be prosecuted and punished to the full extent of the law.

 

[j-mac]

Here's the problem, Anger Issues. This assassin was ONLY a problem because he couldn't get mental health treatment, but he had no problem getting a gun.

Fortunately for all involved, he turned himself in before he hurt anyone.

Now, how about this for a crazy idea. Let's make it HARD for crazy people to get guns, and EASY for them to get mental health treatment!

I've actually got no problem with, considering we agree on what constitues "crazy"... Disagreement with your ideology is not "crazy"... But I am in favor of better, and more accessible mental health svcs.

 

[hadit]

Bullshit. Rural people aren't even doing most of the work on farms anymore... they bring in Mexicans for that, then complain about the Mexicans.

They own the farms and the cities are totally dependent on them. They can get along without cities a lot better than cities can get along without them. And, a lot of them are armed.

 

[Faun]

Would you like to have seen your assassin succeed?

Of course not. And that POS was rightfully arrested and charged.

Has nothing to do with the others who were peacefully protesting on a public sidewalk.

 

[hadit]

Of course not. And that POS was rightfully arrested and charged.

Has nothing to do with the others who were peacefully protesting on a public sidewalk.

Until the law is changed, what they were doing in front of the Justices' houses is illegal, whether we agree with what they are saying or not.

 

[Godboy]

The part where the first amendment says the government can’t infringe on your free speech or the right to peacefully assemble.

So we can assemble in your living room after breaking down your front door?

 

[Godboy]

Has nothing to do with the others who were peacefully protesting on a public sidewalk.

They arent allowed to protest there. You dont seem to be following along very well. If you dont unserstand the OP, you shouldnt be commenting on it.

 

[Marener]

So we can assemble in your living room after breaking down your front door?

Of course not. Private property is private.

A sidewalk is not private property. It’s public.

 

[Godboy]

Of course not. Private property is private.

A sidewalk is not private property. It’s public.

You cant protest outside judges homes either. Are you just picking and choosing which laws should be obeyed?

 

[Marener]

You cant protest outside judges homes either. Are you just picking and choosing which laws should be obeyed?

Protesting on public property is protected by the first amendment.

 

[marvin martian]

Protesting on public property is protected by the first amendment.

So you're a first amendment absolutist?

Good to know...

 

[Marener]

So you're a first amendment absolutist?

Good to know...

I’m a textualist and an originalist.

No where do the founding fathers indicate that public officials are exempt from hearing the voices of the people.

 

[BS Filter]

Protesting on public property is protected by the first amendment.

Not in front of a judge's home.

 

[Marener]

Not in front of a judge's home.

Is that not public property?

 

[BS Filter]

Is that not public property?

Read this.

Refusing to Prosecute Those Protesting at Supreme Court Justices’ Homes Is Inexcusable

One of the strengths of America is our legal system in which we settle our disputes peacefully in courts. We do this without the type of violence, intimidation, and threats against judges that occur in too many other countries around the world. We take for granted that judges in our country can...

www.heritage.org

 

[Marener]

Read this.

Refusing to Prosecute Those Protesting at Supreme Court Justices’ Homes Is Inexcusable

One of the strengths of America is our legal system in which we settle our disputes peacefully in courts. We do this without the type of violence, intimidation, and threats against judges that occur in too many other countries around the world. We take for granted that judges in our country can...

www.heritage.org

Freedom of speech protects speech we don’t like. Deal with it.

 

[marvin martian]

I’m a textualist and an originalist.

No where do the founding fathers indicate that public officials are exempt from hearing the voices of the people.

So you only agree with laws that existed at the time of the Founding Fathers. Everything since then is not legitimate.

Good to know...