Lol. If judges nominated by Republicans shoot down election challenges at a rate about 60 to 1 it is accurate. The argument was corruption then to. If William Barr the most corrupt AG in modern history says YOUR argument is a "Red herring" something that is also said by a unanimous court of appeals responding to the government wanting their documents back. In the process annihilating the ruling of the one court challenge going in your favor in this case. It is accurate. The prosecutor Garland appointed to investigate is named John R Laush. Gues what party nominated him?
Not only aren't the refs not "in our pocket" they are Republicans. But hey, don't let something like that stop your narrative.