Biden Administration Urges Court Not to Allow Release of ‘Secret Report’ on Dominion Voting Machines

[excalibur]

Hmmm? I wonder why. I mean, there's no there there, is there? Oh, some lame excuse will do though.

Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a judge not to authorize at this time the release of a report that analyzes Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist hackers trying to “undermine election security.”

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.

The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.

While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities and associated mitigation measures with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing in the case.

The case was brought in 2017 by good-government groups and voters who say the lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process.

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by CISA to reject attempts to release a redacted version of Halderman’s report for now.

CISA officials want to review the information in the report and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the report is released. They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished.

Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.

...​

Biden Administration Urges Court Not to Allow Release of Sealed Report on Dominion Voting Machines

www.theepochtimes.com

​

 

[Concerned American]

Hmmm? I wonder why. I mean, there's no there there, is there? Oh, some lame excuse will do though.

​

Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a judge not to authorize at this time the release of a report that analyzes Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist hackers trying to “undermine election security.”​

​

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.​

​

The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.​

​

While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities and associated mitigation measures with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing in the case.​

​

The case was brought in 2017 by good-government groups and voters who say the lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process.​

​

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by CISA to reject attempts to release a redacted version of Halderman’s report for now.​

​

CISA officials want to review the information in the report and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the report is released. They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished.​

​

Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.​

​

...​

Biden Administration Urges Court Not to Allow Release of Sealed Report on Dominion Voting Machines

www.theepochtimes.com

​

Sounds to me like the admin is admitting there are potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers. That admission should be all that is required to ban the use of the machines. Don't you agree?

 

[excalibur]

Sounds to me like the admin is admitting there are potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers. That admission should be all that is required to ban the use of the machines. Don't you agree?

Banned from 2020 onward.

 

[Concerned American]

Banned from 2020 onward.

Not sure I understand your statement. Have they been banned since 2020 or are you advocating that they should be? I think either/both would be welcome

 

[mudwhistle]

Hmmm? I wonder why. I mean, there's no there there, is there? Oh, some lame excuse will do though.

​

Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a judge not to authorize at this time the release of a report that analyzes Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist hackers trying to “undermine election security.”​

​

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.​

​

The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.​

​

While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities and associated mitigation measures with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing in the case.​

​

The case was brought in 2017 by good-government groups and voters who say the lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process.​

​

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by CISA to reject attempts to release a redacted version of Halderman’s report for now.​

​

CISA officials want to review the information in the report and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the report is released. They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished.​

​

Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.​

​

...​

Biden Administration Urges Court Not to Allow Release of Sealed Report on Dominion Voting Machines

www.theepochtimes.com

​

What does Biden have to hide?

 

[rightwinger]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

 

[Paleman]

Hmmm? I wonder why. I mean, there's no there there, is there? Oh, some lame excuse will do though.

​

Top officials at a U.S. federal cybersecurity agency are urging a judge not to authorize at this time the release of a report that analyzes Dominion Voting Systems equipment in Georgia, arguing doing so could assist hackers trying to “undermine election security.”​

​

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was recently provided an unredacted copy of the report, which was prepared by J. Alex Halderman, director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society.​

​

The report discusses “potential vulnerabilities in Dominion ImageCast X ballot marking devices,” or electronic voting devices, according to the government.​

​

While CISA supports public disclosure of any vulnerabilities and associated mitigation measures with election equipment, allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said in a Feb. 10 filing in the case.​

​

The case was brought in 2017 by good-government groups and voters who say the lack of paper ballots undermines the voting process.​

​

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg, an Obama nominee overseeing the case, was urged by CISA to reject attempts to release a redacted version of Halderman’s report for now.​

​

CISA officials want to review the information in the report and help Dominion resolve the vulnerabilities identified before the report is released. They said they weren’t able to provide a date by which they’ll be finished.​

​

Totenberg must weigh the request against the wishes of Georgia Secretary State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican and one of the defendants, who called in late January for the release to happen immediately.​

​

...​

Biden Administration Urges Court Not to Allow Release of Sealed Report on Dominion Voting Machines

www.theepochtimes.com

​

This is what I think about this report. They have without a doubt, found that the Dominion system is vulnerable to being hacked. Can the DEMONRATS prove that it was NOT hacked. not voter fraud and all elections were fair and square?

 

[sparky]

It's all about national security , RIGHT?

~S~

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

Elections are supposed to be transparent.
So how in the hell can releasing the machines be a vulnerability?
Unless of course they have something to hide just like the thousands of hours of video they refuse to release about Jan 6.

 

[mudwhistle]

What does Biden have to hide?

View attachment 601083

 

[struth]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

haha what bs


what is xiden hiding and why? this is especially important in light of what durham has uncovered in regards how the dems tried to undermine the 2016 election

 

[Resnic]

I don't get it. Biden won and he swore up and down it was the most secure election ever and his administration went on and on about how the election was bullet proof and there was no fraud and so on.

Now they want to change election laws all the sudden because they say the next election could be illegitimate (I assume that means if they lose) when absolutely nothing has changed since they won last time. If nothing changed and it was a solid election then why add new laws?

And if it was indeed rock solid then why don't they want the documents to be seen? If everything was on the up and up then what do they have to hide? Seems like showing the documents would prove everything is right and prove them correct.

 

[Doc7505]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

Simple do away with the machines and go to paper ballots and voter ID.

 

[Doc7505]

Americans want the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth! We all know the election was rigged just like we know Hillary was the mastermind behind the Russia hoax! We want accountability and consequences to this lawlessness!!

 

[JusticeHammer]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

Which means they don't want the truth to get out.

 

[Darkwind]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

In the late Spring and early Summer of 2020, the Democrats were making loud complaints about the vulnerabilities of Dominion voting machines. Suddenly, they stopped making those noises.

I'm of the opinion that they were told to shut up because the Democrats planned on exploiting those vulnerabilities and that this report will out that very thing.

The Dems complain loudly about bad voting machines, but then they make it a crime to complain about bad voting machines.

 

[theHawk]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

Yea, only Democrats are allowed to exploit them.

 

[Couchpotato]

allowing the release of the report at this point “increases the risk that malicious actors may be able to exploit any vulnerabilities and threaten election security,” government lawyers said

These machines aren’t supposed to be connected to the web. If they aren’t connected they aren’t vulnerable. They shouldn’t even have the capability to be connected to the net, that would get rid of any risk of them being hacked or at least reduce it to a level that is so small that it would be of zero concern

 

[rightwinger]

These machines aren’t supposed to be connected to the web. If they aren’t connected they aren’t vulnerable. They shouldn’t even have the capability to be connected to the net, that would get rid of any risk of them being hacked or at least reduce it to a level that is so small that it would be of zero concern

Agree

 

[Couchpotato]

Agree

I think by law they arent supposed to be connected to the net. I’m not sure why they have the capability to be or why a jurisdiction would purchase machines that have that capability