Judge Issues Huge Decision On Georgia Voting Machines

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2011
58,429
51,793
3,600
Does Dominion have someone else to sue now? Judge Amy Totenberg. Here is what the court said.

Critically, the court denied that criticism of security flaws with Georgia’s voting machines are based purely on “conspiracy theories.”


“The Court notes that the record evidence does not suggest that the Plaintiffs are conspiracy theorists of any variety. Indeed, some of the nation’s leading cybersecurity experts and computer scientists have provided testimony and affidavits on behalf of Plaintiffs’ case in the long course of this litigation,” the judge’s footnote remarked.
 
Does Dominion have someone else to sue now? Judge Amy Totenberg. Here is what the court said.

Critically, the court denied that criticism of security flaws with Georgia’s voting machines are based purely on “conspiracy theories.”


“The Court notes that the record evidence does not suggest that the Plaintiffs are conspiracy theorists of any variety. Indeed, some of the nation’s leading cybersecurity experts and computer scientists have provided testimony and affidavits on behalf of Plaintiffs’ case in the long course of this litigation,” the judge’s footnote remarked.

:linky:
 
You guys are truly gullible clowns.
Irony-Meter-Explode.jpg
 
Does Dominion have someone else to sue now? Judge Amy Totenberg. Here is what the court said.

Critically, the court denied that criticism of security flaws with Georgia’s voting machines are based purely on “conspiracy theories.”


“The Court notes that the record evidence does not suggest that the Plaintiffs are conspiracy theorists of any variety. Indeed, some of the nation’s leading cybersecurity experts and computer scientists have provided testimony and affidavits on behalf of Plaintiffs’ case in the long course of this litigation,” the judge’s footnote remarked.
How come you left this line out - "The Court then announced that it will “resolve these material factual disputes and related legal issues based on the evidence presented at a bench trial to begin on January 9, 2024.”?
 
These cases are also out there.

 
How come you left this line out - "The Court then announced that it will “resolve these material factual disputes and related legal issues based on the evidence presented at a bench trial to begin on January 9, 2024.”?
That does not change what she said.
 

Forum List

Back
Top