flacaltenn
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #121
You have Google. I don't care if you believe me. All we can say is that everything we know so far shows that children might in fact become dependent on nicotine from secondhand smoke.
Now you have a WHOLE 'nother theory on this nonsense policy. That's pretty fast base stealing there. Secondhand smoke that government said was MORE dangerous than the what the smoker was exposed to???
When ya gonna learn to take "govt science" as an oxymoron?