Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 71,778
- 35,994
- 2,615
What's a shooter without a gun?True, but we still have to deal with shooters.
A nobody
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's a shooter without a gun?True, but we still have to deal with shooters.
Look at you, unable to add anything to the conversation.I think every kid age 5 and up should have an AR 15
Wooeee...that'd be fun at recess
You say that like you're going to get rid of guns.What's a shooter without a gun?
A nobody
I'm thinking a shoulder-fired weapon would be best, especially for women. It needs to be,
Small and light.
Ready-to-fire; no safety.
Soft recoil.
Noise suppressed.
Semi-auto loading.
Mag capacity of 15 rounds/plus.
Able to pierce body armor.
All reasonable means should be employed to protect schools.Active Shooter, Classroom Lockdown, Door Barricade, Home Safety, School Lockdown, School Safety - How Door Locks Have Saved Lives - Nightlock
How Door Locks Have Saved Lives - How Door Locks Have Saved Lives In the year 2018, there has been a reoccurrence of devastating school shootings. With mental health and gun laws being putnightlock.com
Best Practices for Securing Classroom Doors from the Inside
The Sandy Hook Advisory Commission and The National Association of State Fire Marshals recommend doors that can be locked from the inside only.www.campussafetymagazine.com
The report says testimony and other evidence presented to the commission revealed that there has never been an event in which an active shooter was able to breach a locked classroom door.
Yeah, right! Those type weapons exist only in your imagination!I'm thinking a shoulder-fired weapon would be best, especially for women. It needs to be,
Small and light.
Ready-to-fire; no safety.
Soft recoil.
Noise suppressed.
Semi-auto loading.
Mag capacity of 15 rounds/plus.
Able to pierce body armor.
Pedophiles?No group should be hated. NOT ONE.
It appears you don't understand that, at all.
Yeah, right! Those type weapons exist only in your imagination!
Home schooling is the best defense for the kids. The groomers are as much a threat as guns.
Stun guns----might be a good way to go for teachers--assuming their class doesn't steal their weapon.These people actively do not trust and even hate teachers and now we're supposed to believe they fully trust us with guns.
Sure. Sure you do.
I'm thinking a shoulder-fired weapon would be best, especially for women. It needs to be,
Small and light.
Ready-to-fire; no safety.
Soft recoil.
Noise suppressed.
Semi-auto loading.
Mag capacity of 15 rounds/plus.
Able to pierce body armor.
All reasonable means should be employed to protect schools.
No one has ever said that ALL teachers are evil, or even, evil groomers. It is a fool who thinks that some teachers will follow an ideology over an ethic.This is what consistency looks like, fellow conservatives. Compare and contrast with the following:
1. Two weeks ago, I thought teachers were evil groomers who I couldn't trust to even talk to my kids
2. School shooting
3. Now, I trust those same people with guns around my kid
The above is not a reasonable or logical position
No one has ever said that ALL teachers are evil, or even, evil groomers. It is a fool who thinks that some teachers will follow an ideology over an ethic.
I don't need them for anything of the sort. I support hardening schools and allowing trained teachers to conceal carry on the job.Two weeks ago you needed us as stand ins for you evil groomer crusade. Now you need us to prop up your 2nd amendment.
Like we can't see we're being used.
I don't need them for anything of the sort. I support hardening schools and allowing trained teachers to conceal carry on the job.
What I do need and expect is that teachers stick to teaching the fundamentals, which DO NOT include speaking about sex, gender, or any other age-inappropriate subjects.
It is NOT a difficult thing to understand and is a minimum ethical standard.
I don't need them for anything of the sort. I support hardening schools and allowing trained teachers to conceal carry on the job.
What I do need and expect is that teachers stick to teaching the fundamentals, which DO NOT include speaking about sex, gender, or any other age-inappropriate subjects.
It is NOT a difficult thing to understand and is a minimum ethical standard.