Bernie’s Economic Bill Of Rights Taken Nearly Verbatim From Stalin’s 1936 Soviet Constitution

[rightwinger]

We are the wealthiest nation on earth
So much so, that we just gave our wealthy a $1.5 trillion tax cut

We can afford to take care of our citizens

 

[rightwinger]

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

Cite the dangerous idea.

You mean like the part where we all pay for it for everyone else?

Missed the first bullet didn’t you?

Nope. The first bullet point leads to the rest. Why don't you tell me what a "living wage" is?

See the rest of the bullets

No need Komrade. Stalin would be proud.

So would Jesus

 

[Ambivalent1]

We are the wealthiest nation on earth
So much so, that we just gave our wealthy a $1.5 trillion tax cut

We can afford to take care of our citizens

Pay your own way *****.

 

[Ambivalent1]

You mean like the part where we all pay for it for everyone else?

Missed the first bullet didn’t you?

Nope. The first bullet point leads to the rest. Why don't you tell me what a "living wage" is?

See the rest of the bullets

No need Komrade. Stalin would be proud.

So would Jesus

Nope. Paul said "If they won't work, they won't eat". Sorry

 

[Nosmo King]

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

Cite the dangerous idea.

It's always the same old promise, that always get broken.

Cite which of these was not also guaranteed to Venezuelans (under Chavez "Democratic Socialism")

Funny how government forced / controlled things often don't turn out as promised.

You Socialist are so quick to pretend to be a defender of "Rights", and the first to snatch them away.

You failed to answer my simple question. Which of these ideas is dangerous?

All of them kid.
I don't owe you shit. If YOU can't feed, clothe and house your own kids tough shit.

Don't very call America "great" if you don't think a great nation with government of, by and FOR the pole cannot provide to the least advantaged among us.

This ain't Darwinism, it's a mark of greatness.

 

[Ambivalent1]

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

Cite the dangerous idea.

It's always the same old promise, that always get broken.

Cite which of these was not also guaranteed to Venezuelans (under Chavez "Democratic Socialism")

Funny how government forced / controlled things often don't turn out as promised.

You Socialist are so quick to pretend to be a defender of "Rights", and the first to snatch them away.

You failed to answer my simple question. Which of these ideas is dangerous?

All of them kid.
I don't owe you shit. If YOU can't feed, clothe and house your own kids tough shit.

Don't very call America "great" if you don't think a great nation with government of, by and FOR the pole cannot provide to the least advantaged among us.

This ain't Darwinism, it's a mark of greatness.

Nope Komrade. Move, pay your own way and stop crying.

 

[Nosmo King]

Missed the first bullet didn’t you?

Nope. The first bullet point leads to the rest. Why don't you tell me what a "living wage" is?

See the rest of the bullets

No need Komrade. Stalin would be proud.

So would Jesus

Nope. Paul said "If they won't work, they won't eat". Sorry

Rand Paul does not call the shots.

 

[Ambivalent1]

Nope. The first bullet point leads to the rest. Why don't you tell me what a "living wage" is?

See the rest of the bullets

No need Komrade. Stalin would be proud.

So would Jesus

Nope. Paul said "If they won't work, they won't eat". Sorry

Rand Paul does not call the shots.

LOL, oh crap.....really?
Go away kid, the Apostle Paul said that

 

[occupied]

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

Cite the dangerous idea.

It's always the same old promise, that always get broken.

Cite which of these was not also guaranteed to Venezuelans (under Chavez "Democratic Socialism")

Funny how government forced / controlled things often don't turn out as promised.

You Socialist are so quick to pretend to be a defender of "Rights", and the first to snatch them away.

You Trumpbots have overused the term "socialist" until it simply means not being cruel to the working class.

 

[Ambivalent1]

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

Cite the dangerous idea.

It's always the same old promise, that always get broken.

Cite which of these was not also guaranteed to Venezuelans (under Chavez "Democratic Socialism")

Funny how government forced / controlled things often don't turn out as promised.

You Socialist are so quick to pretend to be a defender of "Rights", and the first to snatch them away.

You Trumpbots have overused the term "socialist" until it simply means not being cruel to the working class.

The fact that you think Rump is any different than Barry tells me you are ignorant of reality.

 

[Billy000]

Never saw that coming, did you?


Bernie Sanders' 'Economic Bill of Rights' Taken Nearly Verbatim From Stalin's 1936 Soviet Constitution

Sometimes I wonder what the nation would be like if republicans weren’t so stupid.

 

[Manonthestreet]

The Bill of Rights that establishes once and for all that every American, regardless of his or her income in entitled to:

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

OMG!

I can see why conservatives would be outraged

For one your living wage is no where near such.....not even comfortable poverty.

 

[Billy000]

Never saw that coming, did you?


Bernie Sanders' 'Economic Bill of Rights' Taken Nearly Verbatim From Stalin's 1936 Soviet Constitution

Lol this is actually a funny meme. Usually right wing memes aren’t funny when they try to be simply because they are dumber people, but this one works.

 

[Nosmo King]

See the rest of the bullets

No need Komrade. Stalin would be proud.

So would Jesus

Nope. Paul said "If they won't work, they won't eat". Sorry

Rand Paul does not call the shots.

LOL, oh crap.....really?
Go away kid, the Apostle Paul said that

Then refer to him as such. What did Jesus say?

 

[bripat9643]

The Bill of Rights that establishes once and for all that every American, regardless of his or her income in entitled to:

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

OMG!

I can see why conservatives would be outraged

Wanna point out specifically where in the BOR these fantasy right are enumerated?

Who said they were in the Bill of Rights?

Jefferson spoke of......Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness

Any free nation should strive for the rights Bernie speaks of

"The pursuit of happiness" is something different from the guarantee off happiness.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Never saw that coming, did you?


Bernie Sanders' 'Economic Bill of Rights' Taken Nearly Verbatim From Stalin's 1936 Soviet Constitution

i for one am totally shocked

yeah what are you so scared of! the government already handles the social programs we already have SO well .
What could possibly by any means necessary go wrong
derp

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

You failed to answer my simple question. Which of these ideas is dangerous?

They are ALL dangerous, in the context of Socialism.

You failed to understand the ignorance and omissions of your question.....(or simply expect an ignorant audience)
I'm not going to qualify your game by omitting the fact that any rights you speak of are at the expense of other freedoms and liberty itself.
If you think taking from some to give to others is "fair", then you make a good Venezuelan Socialist and possibly Communist.

What's in question is the process by which you would apply and enforce those alleged rights. Not the "rights" themselves.
Additionally, forcing producers to take care of non producers is a losing strategy. Again, what part of Socialism in Venezuela can you not comprehend?

Good try. But anyone with at least an IQ of 60 can see right through your ploy.

 

[imawhosure]

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

Cite the dangerous idea.

It's always the same old promise, that always get broken.

Cite which of these was not also guaranteed to Venezuelans (under Chavez "Democratic Socialism")

Funny how government forced / controlled things often don't turn out as promised.

You Socialist are so quick to pretend to be a defender of "Rights", and the first to snatch them away.

You Trumpbots have overused the term "socialist" until it simply means not being cruel to the working class.

Never saw that coming, did you?


Bernie Sanders' 'Economic Bill of Rights' Taken Nearly Verbatim From Stalin's 1936 Soviet Constitution

Sometimes I wonder what the nation would be like if republicans weren’t so stupid.

The Bill of Rights that establishes once and for all that every American, regardless of his or her income in entitled to:

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

OMG!

I can see why conservatives would be outraged

Wanna point out specifically where in the BOR these fantasy right are enumerated?

Who said they were in the Bill of Rights?

Jefferson spoke of......Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness

Any free nation should strive for the rights Bernie speaks of

"The pursuit of happiness" is something different from the guarantee off happiness.

Some of these people are just so ignorant, you have to laugh at them, lol.

Our country is made up of NEGATIVE RIGHTS, not positive ones. Our rights are about, what our government can NOT do to you, NOT what they WILL do for you!

Why?

Because as soon as you create a POSTIVE right, you push the responsibility to PROVIDE the positive right on to someone else, and that is called SLAVERY, or SERVITUDE! If I have a RIGHT to ANYTHING, that means that someone else MUST provide it to me, does it not? Of course it does!

This is exactly why illiterate people like Rightwinger and Occupied, have no idea what the hell they are talking about! Just consider------------->whatever RIGHTWINGER and OCCUPIED do for a living...…...that is, if they are even gainfully employed, lol...……………...that WE make what they do a right for us to have!

So therefore, they must NOW supply it to us for FREE, if we can NOT, or will NOT pay for it, because it is our RIGHT to have it! Meaning of course, if we refuse to, or can NOT pay, they must supply whatever their job is to us, FOR FREE-)

Why?

Because they just made whatever they do, a POSITIVE RIGHT for us to have, and now they are on the hook to supply it!

Like I said, that is why our bill of rights, are all NEGATIVE rights...…….but these SOCIALISTS, they all know better, lol.

 

[Nosmo King]

You failed to answer my simple question. Which of these ideas is dangerous?

They are ALL dangerous, in the context of Socialism.

You failed to understand the ignorance and omissions of your question.....(or simply expect an ignorant audience)
I'm not going to qualify your game by omitting the fact that any rights you speak of are at the expense of other freedoms and liberty itself.
If you think taking from some to give to others is "fair", then you make a good Venezuelan Socialist and possibly Communist.

What's in question is the process by which you would apply and enforce those alleged rights. Not the "rights" themselves.
Additionally, forcing producers to take care of non producers is a losing strategy. Again, what part of Socialism in Venezuela can you not comprehend?

Good try. But anyone with at least an IQ of 60 can see right through your ploy.

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

None of these are dangerous. In fact, denying peolemof these is dangerous. How do you suppose revolutions get their support? By governments saying 'let them eat cake'!

Deny people a decent job? That will be so radically unpopular, you're asking for blowback. Healthcare? Expect the worst. Education? Be happy as a third world nation. Housing? That flies in the face of every notion of compassion. And who needs a clean environment? Finally, those who worked and produced their entire lives DESERVE economic dignity at the very least.

Deliberate cruelty has never been an ideology that gets steam from the majority.

 

[bripat9643]

You failed to answer my simple question. Which of these ideas is dangerous?

They are ALL dangerous, in the context of Socialism.

You failed to understand the ignorance and omissions of your question.....(or simply expect an ignorant audience)
I'm not going to qualify your game by omitting the fact that any rights you speak of are at the expense of other freedoms and liberty itself.
If you think taking from some to give to others is "fair", then you make a good Venezuelan Socialist and possibly Communist.

What's in question is the process by which you would apply and enforce those alleged rights. Not the "rights" themselves.
Additionally, forcing producers to take care of non producers is a losing strategy. Again, what part of Socialism in Venezuela can you not comprehend?

Good try. But anyone with at least an IQ of 60 can see right through your ploy.

• The right to a decent job that pays a living wage
• The right to quality health care
• The right to a complete education
• The right to affordable housing
• The right to a clean environment
• The right to a secure retirement

None of these are dangerous. In fact, denying peolemof these is dangerous. How do you suppose revolutions get their support? By governments saying 'let them eat cake'!

Deny people a decent job? That will be so radically unpopular, you're asking for blowback. Healthcare? Expect the worst. Education? Be happy as a third world nation. Housing? That flies in the face of every notion of compassion. And who needs a clean environment? Finally, those who worked and produced their entire lives DESERVE economic dignity at the very least.

Deliberate cruelty has never been an ideology that gets steam from the majority.

They're all dangerous, moron. They allow government to enslave you. How does government guarantee a job without taking over all the jobs? The fact that you fail to see the danger shows why democracy is doomed to failure.