Bernie Sanders with huge Vermont polling lead

[SwimExpert]

That is good news. But New York could be very interesting. If Hillary cannot take New York she is dine.

Hillary has an average of +30%age points in New York.

Hillary is going to find herself defending from two sides in New York. Bernie AND Trump. Her numbers MAY be solid inside the hard core DNC, BUT will they play well state wide?

Rump isn't running for the Democratic nomination, Pinky.

Don't bother. Darkfury can't be educated.

 

[BIG YANK BAL 1976]

Hillary won't "have" any superdelegates until the first round of voting at the convention.

Wrong, Sanders will be toast way before the convention, , at this point if anyone thinks that a 75 YEAR OLD SOCIALIST has any remote chance is just dumb...

Get a fucking clue the only one that can beat Trump is Clinton.

 

[DarkFury]

That is good news. But New York could be very interesting. If Hillary cannot take New York she is dine.

Hillary has an average of +30%age points in New York.

Hillary is going to find herself defending from two sides in New York. Bernie AND Trump. Her numbers MAY be solid inside the hard core DNC, BUT will they play well state wide?

Rump isn't running for the Democratic nomination, Pinky.

Don't bother. Darkfury can't be educated.

Hillary has NO home town advantage over Trump. The base number of votes could very well reflect the general.

 

[Pogo]

I know this was expected but holy shit! 78% to 13% is insane.

Bernie Sanders with huge Vermont polling lead

If there's one state that should be a slam dunk for Bernie Sanders, Vermont is it. Now there's polling numbers to show that the former mayor of Burlington holds a huuuge lead over Hillary Clinton in his home state. A Vermont Public Radio poll release Monday morning shows Sanders ahead of Clinton 78 percent to 13 percent.

Yet hilary will walk away with the super delegates.

This only matters if the trend continues though. Should Hillary win only because of the super delegates, there will be a lot of very pissed off democrats that will likely make her pay in the general. I don't see that as happening. It is interesting that someone can take the primary votes and still lost it though.

While I'm no Bernie supporter I'd be pissed at the way things are turning out if I was.
Makes ya wonder if liberals are about to put the hurt on the establishment as well.

We shall see. The left is far less likely to challenge their party than the right being the side that actually trusts government but if the election is stolen I think it would generate a massive backlash.

I uh, think you have that backward.

Which "side" came up with the concept of "RINO"?

 

[Freewill]

That is good news. But New York could be very interesting. If Hillary cannot take New York she is dine.

In a normal world she might be done if she lost NY. But the truth is that the fix is in. She is the democrat nominee. All this hoopla about Sanders is just a vehicle to get Mrs. Clinton free air time and keep her name in the news. One would think with the results of the primaries so far that the delegate count would be somewhat close. No way, Clinton is burying Sanders.

Sad that the American people get played as if they have a choice.

 

[jon_berzerk]

That is good news. But New York could be very interesting. If Hillary cannot take New York she is dine.

Hillary has an average of +30%age points in New York.

Hillary is going to find herself defending from two sides in New York. Bernie AND Trump. Her numbers MAY be solid inside the hard core DNC, BUT will they play well state wide?

Rump isn't running for the Democratic nomination, Pinky.

Don't bother. Darkfury can't be educated.

Hillary has NO home town advantage over Trump. The base number of votes could very well reflect the general.

everyday way shows trump way out ahead

this gal is complaining on youtube

while she is stumping for sanders among dems

comes across lots of mean trump supporters

--LOL

 

[Freewill]

I know this was expected but holy shit! 78% to 13% is insane.

Bernie Sanders with huge Vermont polling lead

If there's one state that should be a slam dunk for Bernie Sanders, Vermont is it. Now there's polling numbers to show that the former mayor of Burlington holds a huuuge lead over Hillary Clinton in his home state. A Vermont Public Radio poll release Monday morning shows Sanders ahead of Clinton 78 percent to 13 percent.

And yet it really seems to be irrelevant. Sanders takes the lead at the polls and Hillary remains in the lead with delegates. It will be interesting to see how that plays out.

In my opinion, not interesting, business as usual. The end has already been determined.

 

[bendog]

Newhart - "World's Smallest Horse"

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Hillary has an average of +30%age points in New York.

Hillary is going to find herself defending from two sides in New York. Bernie AND Trump. Her numbers MAY be solid inside the hard core DNC, BUT will they play well state wide?

Rump isn't running for the Democratic nomination, Pinky.

Don't bother. Darkfury can't be educated.

Hillary has NO home town advantage over Trump. The base number of votes could very well reflect the general.

everyday way shows trump way out ahead

that this gal that is complaining on youtube

that while she is stumping for sanders among dems

comes across lots of mean trump supporters

--LOL

Stupid millennials....
Wait until mommy and daddy stop paying her way in life.

 

[SwimExpert]

Hillary has NO home town advantage over Trump. The base number of votes could very well reflect the general.

 

[Pogo]

That is good news. But New York could be very interesting. If Hillary cannot take New York she is dine.

In a normal world she might be done if she lost NY. But the truth is that the fix is in. She is the democrat nominee. All this hoopla about Sanders is just a vehicle to get Mrs. Clinton free air time and keep her name in the news. One would think with the results of the primaries so far that the delegate count would be somewhat close. No way, Clinton is burying Sanders.

Sad that the American people get played as if they have a choice.

If you think Bernie Sanders is somebody's puppet --- you just don't know Bernie Sanders.

 

[Freewill]

That is good news. But New York could be very interesting. If Hillary cannot take New York she is dine.

In a normal world she might be done if she lost NY. But the truth is that the fix is in. She is the democrat nominee. All this hoopla about Sanders is just a vehicle to get Mrs. Clinton free air time and keep her name in the news. One would think with the results of the primaries so far that the delegate count would be somewhat close. No way, Clinton is burying Sanders.

Sad that the American people get played as if they have a choice.

If you think Bernie Sanders is somebody's puppet --- you just don't know Bernie Sanders.

he may not realize it.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I know this was expected but holy shit! 78% to 13% is insane.

Bernie Sanders with huge Vermont polling lead

If there's one state that should be a slam dunk for Bernie Sanders, Vermont is it. Now there's polling numbers to show that the former mayor of Burlington holds a huuuge lead over Hillary Clinton in his home state. A Vermont Public Radio poll release Monday morning shows Sanders ahead of Clinton 78 percent to 13 percent.

In other news, water is wet!

 

[FA_Q2]

I know this was expected but holy shit! 78% to 13% is insane.

Bernie Sanders with huge Vermont polling lead

If there's one state that should be a slam dunk for Bernie Sanders, Vermont is it. Now there's polling numbers to show that the former mayor of Burlington holds a huuuge lead over Hillary Clinton in his home state. A Vermont Public Radio poll release Monday morning shows Sanders ahead of Clinton 78 percent to 13 percent.

Yet hilary will walk away with the super delegates.

This only matters if the trend continues though. Should Hillary win only because of the super delegates, there will be a lot of very pissed off democrats that will likely make her pay in the general. I don't see that as happening. It is interesting that someone can take the primary votes and still lost it though.

While I'm no Bernie supporter I'd be pissed at the way things are turning out if I was.
Makes ya wonder if liberals are about to put the hurt on the establishment as well.

We shall see. The left is far less likely to challenge their party than the right being the side that actually trusts government but if the election is stolen I think it would generate a massive backlash.

I uh, think you have that backward.

Which "side" came up with the concept of "RINO"?

Irrelevant. The left is far more likely to fall behind their party than the right - that is simple fact. Look at the schism in the right at this moment - it is rather large and the right is tearing itself apart. Where is OWS? Where is the Tea Party?

One is still quite active and making waves through the entire party. The other is doing almost nothing.

 

[Pogo]

Yet hilary will walk away with the super delegates.

This only matters if the trend continues though. Should Hillary win only because of the super delegates, there will be a lot of very pissed off democrats that will likely make her pay in the general. I don't see that as happening. It is interesting that someone can take the primary votes and still lost it though.

While I'm no Bernie supporter I'd be pissed at the way things are turning out if I was.
Makes ya wonder if liberals are about to put the hurt on the establishment as well.

We shall see. The left is far less likely to challenge their party than the right being the side that actually trusts government but if the election is stolen I think it would generate a massive backlash.

I uh, think you have that backward.

Which "side" came up with the concept of "RINO"?

Irrelevant. The left is far more likely to fall behind their party than the right - that is simple fact. Look at the schism in the right at this moment - it is rather large and the right is tearing itself apart. Where is OWS? Where is the Tea Party?

One is still quite active and making waves through the entire party. The other is doing almost nothing.

The uh, "far left" doesn't even have a party. This nation has a far-right and a center-right party, and they work together to ensure than no other party will ever get traction. And more's the pity --- I hear it said that we're the only nation anywhere that has only two parties, and that cannot be good. I digress, but I'm reminded of the wisdom of Will Rogers:

"I do not belong to an organized political party -- I am a Democrat".

And it's entirely relevant --- when you can come up with the complaint of "RINO" to describe, say, an Olympia Snowe, you're revealing that your objective is Party Above All, and simultaneously ignoring that the job of a Congressional representative is to represent constituents. And that mentality eliminates the option of voting for the best candidate regardless of their party. Thus it requires that you vote on the basis of the letter after the name.

I don't know about any "schism in the right" at the moment, unless you mean the Falwellian "social conservative" crap, but that's been going on for decades. Surely you're not counting Donald Rump as part of "the right", are you?

 

[FA_Q2]

This only matters if the trend continues though. Should Hillary win only because of the super delegates, there will be a lot of very pissed off democrats that will likely make her pay in the general. I don't see that as happening. It is interesting that someone can take the primary votes and still lost it though.

While I'm no Bernie supporter I'd be pissed at the way things are turning out if I was.
Makes ya wonder if liberals are about to put the hurt on the establishment as well.

We shall see. The left is far less likely to challenge their party than the right being the side that actually trusts government but if the election is stolen I think it would generate a massive backlash.

I uh, think you have that backward.

Which "side" came up with the concept of "RINO"?

Irrelevant. The left is far more likely to fall behind their party than the right - that is simple fact. Look at the schism in the right at this moment - it is rather large and the right is tearing itself apart. Where is OWS? Where is the Tea Party?

One is still quite active and making waves through the entire party. The other is doing almost nothing.

The uh, "far left" doesn't even have a party. This nation has a far-right and a center-right party, and they work together to ensure than no other party will ever get traction. And more's the pity --- I hear it said that we're the only nation anywhere that has only two parties, and that cannot be good. I digress, but I'm reminded of the wisdom of Will Rogers:

"I do not belong to an organized political party -- I am a Democrat".

And it's entirely relevant --- when you can come up with the complaint of "RINO" to describe, say, an Olympia Snowe, you're revealing that your objective is Party Above All, and simultaneously ignoring that the job of a Congressional representative is to represent constituents. And that mentality eliminates the option of voting for the best candidate regardless of their party. Thus it requires that you vote on the basis of the letter after the name.

I don't know about any "schism in the right" at the moment, unless you mean the Falwellian "social conservative" crap, but that's been going on for decades. Surely you're not counting Donald Rump as part of "the right", are you?

What are you talking about?

I never mentioned 'far left' at all and you are not commenting on anything that I have said. If you are unaware of the schism within the right then you are being willfully obtuse and there is no point in continuing - I am not going to continue with someone that says water is not wet or the sky is not blue.

 

[Pogo]

While I'm no Bernie supporter I'd be pissed at the way things are turning out if I was.
Makes ya wonder if liberals are about to put the hurt on the establishment as well.

We shall see. The left is far less likely to challenge their party than the right being the side that actually trusts government but if the election is stolen I think it would generate a massive backlash.

I uh, think you have that backward.

Which "side" came up with the concept of "RINO"?

Irrelevant. The left is far more likely to fall behind their party than the right - that is simple fact. Look at the schism in the right at this moment - it is rather large and the right is tearing itself apart. Where is OWS? Where is the Tea Party?

One is still quite active and making waves through the entire party. The other is doing almost nothing.

The uh, "far left" doesn't even have a party. This nation has a far-right and a center-right party, and they work together to ensure than no other party will ever get traction. And more's the pity --- I hear it said that we're the only nation anywhere that has only two parties, and that cannot be good. I digress, but I'm reminded of the wisdom of Will Rogers:

"I do not belong to an organized political party -- I am a Democrat".

And it's entirely relevant --- when you can come up with the complaint of "RINO" to describe, say, an Olympia Snowe, you're revealing that your objective is Party Above All, and simultaneously ignoring that the job of a Congressional representative is to represent constituents. And that mentality eliminates the option of voting for the best candidate regardless of their party. Thus it requires that you vote on the basis of the letter after the name.

I don't know about any "schism in the right" at the moment, unless you mean the Falwellian "social conservative" crap, but that's been going on for decades. Surely you're not counting Donald Rump as part of "the right", are you?

What are you talking about?

I never mentioned 'far left' at all and you are not commenting on anything that I have said. If you are unaware of the schism within the right then you are being willfully obtuse and there is no point in continuing - I am not going to continue with someone that says water is not wet or the sky is not blue.

Fine; I'll just mark another one down as "no response".

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

We shall see. The left is far less likely to challenge their party than the right being the side that actually trusts government but if the election is stolen I think it would generate a massive backlash.

I uh, think you have that backward.

Which "side" came up with the concept of "RINO"?

Irrelevant. The left is far more likely to fall behind their party than the right - that is simple fact. Look at the schism in the right at this moment - it is rather large and the right is tearing itself apart. Where is OWS? Where is the Tea Party?

One is still quite active and making waves through the entire party. The other is doing almost nothing.

The uh, "far left" doesn't even have a party. This nation has a far-right and a center-right party, and they work together to ensure than no other party will ever get traction. And more's the pity --- I hear it said that we're the only nation anywhere that has only two parties, and that cannot be good. I digress, but I'm reminded of the wisdom of Will Rogers:

"I do not belong to an organized political party -- I am a Democrat".

And it's entirely relevant --- when you can come up with the complaint of "RINO" to describe, say, an Olympia Snowe, you're revealing that your objective is Party Above All, and simultaneously ignoring that the job of a Congressional representative is to represent constituents. And that mentality eliminates the option of voting for the best candidate regardless of their party. Thus it requires that you vote on the basis of the letter after the name.

I don't know about any "schism in the right" at the moment, unless you mean the Falwellian "social conservative" crap, but that's been going on for decades. Surely you're not counting Donald Rump as part of "the right", are you?

What are you talking about?

I never mentioned 'far left' at all and you are not commenting on anything that I have said. If you are unaware of the schism within the right then you are being willfully obtuse and there is no point in continuing - I am not going to continue with someone that says water is not wet or the sky is not blue.

Fine; I'll just mark another one down as "no response".

Dont pat yourself on the back to hard,i'm pretty it's just that your stupid outlasted his patience.

 

[bendog]

This only matters if the trend continues though. Should Hillary win only because of the super delegates, there will be a lot of very pissed off democrats that will likely make her pay in the general. I don't see that as happening. It is interesting that someone can take the primary votes and still lost it though.

While I'm no Bernie supporter I'd be pissed at the way things are turning out if I was.
Makes ya wonder if liberals are about to put the hurt on the establishment as well.

We shall see. The left is far less likely to challenge their party than the right being the side that actually trusts government but if the election is stolen I think it would generate a massive backlash.

I uh, think you have that backward.

Which "side" came up with the concept of "RINO"?

Irrelevant. The left is far more likely to fall behind their party than the right - that is simple fact. Look at the schism in the right at this moment - it is rather large and the right is tearing itself apart. Where is OWS? Where is the Tea Party?

One is still quite active and making waves through the entire party. The other is doing almost nothing.

The uh, "far left" doesn't even have a party. This nation has a far-right and a center-right party, and they work together to ensure than no other party will ever get traction. And more's the pity --- I hear it said that we're the only nation anywhere that has only two parties, and that cannot be good. I digress, but I'm reminded of the wisdom of Will Rogers:

"I do not belong to an organized political party -- I am a Democrat".

And it's entirely relevant --- when you can come up with the complaint of "RINO" to describe, say, an Olympia Snowe, you're revealing that your objective is Party Above All, and simultaneously ignoring that the job of a Congressional representative is to represent constituents. And that mentality eliminates the option of voting for the best candidate regardless of their party. Thus it requires that you vote on the basis of the letter after the name.

I don't know about any "schism in the right" at the moment, unless you mean the Falwellian "social conservative" crap, but that's been going on for decades. Surely you're not counting Donald Rump as part of "the right", are you?

The schism is the cobbling together of the Grover Norquist "starve the beast" and the tea party. Norquist folk's goal is simply after realizing they'll never get the votes to privatize (kill) soc sec and medicare, they want the deficits to be so large we have no choice but to kill them. The tea party are simply deluded that saying we can balance the budget by cutting welfare is piss they've bought to drink. In short, the gop is left with a party that cannot govern. All it can do is to refuse to pass stuff.

 

[HenryBHough]

Nobody "gets to vote twice", Henry.

To see such faith in one so young!

Touching!