Ben Carson: Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The Devil

[tinydancer]

The pogroms are real.

They steal my soul because it is not just that it happened decades in the past but because the new Ukraine we wish to back. NO CHOSE TO BACK. Are those of the Nazis.

I truly do not understand this.

 

[Lakhota]

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct.”

In a speech delivered in 2012, Ben Carson said the big bang theory was part of the “fairy tales” pushed by “high-faluting scientists” as a story of creation.

Similarly, Carson, a noted creationist, said he believed the theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“Now what about the big bang theory,” said Carson at speech to fellow Seventh-day Adventists titled “Celebration of Creation,” about the theory for the origin of the universe.

“I find the big bang, really quite fascinating. I mean, here you have all these high-faluting scientists and they’re saying it was this gigantic explosion and everything came into perfect order. Now these are the same scientists that go around touting the second law of thermodynamics, which is entropy, which says that things move toward a state of disorganization.

“So now you’re gonna have this big explosion and everything becomes perfectly organized and when you ask them about it they say, ‘Well we can explain this, based on probability theory because if there’s enough big explosions, over a long period of time, billions and billions of years, one of them will be the perfect explosion,” continued Carson. “So I say what you’re telling me is if I blow a hurricane through a junkyard enough times over billions and billions of years, eventually after one of those hurricanes there will be a 747 fully loaded and ready to fly.”

Carson added that he believed the big bang was “even more ridiculous” because there is order to the universe.

“Well, I mean, it’s even more ridiculous than that ‘cause our solar system, not to mention the universe outside of that, is extraordinarily well organized, to the point where we can predict 70 years away when a comet is coming,” he said. “Now that type of organization to just come out of an explosion? I mean, you want to talk about fairy tales, that is amazing.”

Later, Carson said he personally believed Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct,” said Carson.

“Amazingly, there are a significant number of scientists who do not believe it but they’re afraid to say anything,” Carson added, saying he would be writing a book, “The Organ of Species,” that shows how the organs of the body refute evolution.

Ben Carson: Big Bang A Fairy Tale, Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The Devil

OMG, I can't imagine this man as president.

Okay, I'll bite.

How old does Carson think Earth is? I mean, does he think that humans arrived here six thousand years ago?

What's his explanation for plate tectonics, sea floor spreading, and continental drift?

And here's a goody: Where, physically, is heaven and hell?

OMG, that's devil talk! Blasphemy! All intelligent folks know that Jesus rode in on a dinosaur about 6,000 years ago and created everything. Do not mention anything about Jesus knocking up his own mother and becoming his own father.

 

[tinydancer]

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct.”

In a speech delivered in 2012, Ben Carson said the big bang theory was part of the “fairy tales” pushed by “high-faluting scientists” as a story of creation.

Similarly, Carson, a noted creationist, said he believed the theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“Now what about the big bang theory,” said Carson at speech to fellow Seventh-day Adventists titled “Celebration of Creation,” about the theory for the origin of the universe.

“I find the big bang, really quite fascinating. I mean, here you have all these high-faluting scientists and they’re saying it was this gigantic explosion and everything came into perfect order. Now these are the same scientists that go around touting the second law of thermodynamics, which is entropy, which says that things move toward a state of disorganization.

“So now you’re gonna have this big explosion and everything becomes perfectly organized and when you ask them about it they say, ‘Well we can explain this, based on probability theory because if there’s enough big explosions, over a long period of time, billions and billions of years, one of them will be the perfect explosion,” continued Carson. “So I say what you’re telling me is if I blow a hurricane through a junkyard enough times over billions and billions of years, eventually after one of those hurricanes there will be a 747 fully loaded and ready to fly.”

Carson added that he believed the big bang was “even more ridiculous” because there is order to the universe.

“Well, I mean, it’s even more ridiculous than that ‘cause our solar system, not to mention the universe outside of that, is extraordinarily well organized, to the point where we can predict 70 years away when a comet is coming,” he said. “Now that type of organization to just come out of an explosion? I mean, you want to talk about fairy tales, that is amazing.”

Later, Carson said he personally believed Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct,” said Carson.

“Amazingly, there are a significant number of scientists who do not believe it but they’re afraid to say anything,” Carson added, saying he would be writing a book, “The Organ of Species,” that shows how the organs of the body refute evolution.

Ben Carson: Big Bang A Fairy Tale, Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The Devil

OMG, I can't imagine this man as president.

Okay, I'll bite.

How old does Carson think Earth is? I mean, does he think that humans arrived here six thousand years ago?

What's his explanation for plate tectonics, sea floor spreading, and continental drift?

And here's a goody: Where, physically, is heaven and hell?

I have to run Raven.

But I can hit your third question. Where physically is heaven and hell?



A bar in Lackawanna

 

[Mr. H.]

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct.”

In a speech delivered in 2012, Ben Carson said the big bang theory was part of the “fairy tales” pushed by “high-faluting scientists” as a story of creation.

Similarly, Carson, a noted creationist, said he believed the theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“Now what about the big bang theory,” said Carson at speech to fellow Seventh-day Adventists titled “Celebration of Creation,” about the theory for the origin of the universe.

“I find the big bang, really quite fascinating. I mean, here you have all these high-faluting scientists and they’re saying it was this gigantic explosion and everything came into perfect order. Now these are the same scientists that go around touting the second law of thermodynamics, which is entropy, which says that things move toward a state of disorganization.

“So now you’re gonna have this big explosion and everything becomes perfectly organized and when you ask them about it they say, ‘Well we can explain this, based on probability theory because if there’s enough big explosions, over a long period of time, billions and billions of years, one of them will be the perfect explosion,” continued Carson. “So I say what you’re telling me is if I blow a hurricane through a junkyard enough times over billions and billions of years, eventually after one of those hurricanes there will be a 747 fully loaded and ready to fly.”

Carson added that he believed the big bang was “even more ridiculous” because there is order to the universe.

“Well, I mean, it’s even more ridiculous than that ‘cause our solar system, not to mention the universe outside of that, is extraordinarily well organized, to the point where we can predict 70 years away when a comet is coming,” he said. “Now that type of organization to just come out of an explosion? I mean, you want to talk about fairy tales, that is amazing.”

Later, Carson said he personally believed Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct,” said Carson.

“Amazingly, there are a significant number of scientists who do not believe it but they’re afraid to say anything,” Carson added, saying he would be writing a book, “The Organ of Species,” that shows how the organs of the body refute evolution.

Ben Carson: Big Bang A Fairy Tale, Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The Devil

OMG, I can't imagine this man as president.

So let me get this straight. Back in 2008 a semi African-American with no birth certificate, no college transcripts, and a published book espousing his socialist ideals announces his candidacy for President of the United States of America. He so informs us that he will "fundamentally transform America".

And you saw no shit on your radar?

 

[Lakhota]

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct.”

In a speech delivered in 2012, Ben Carson said the big bang theory was part of the “fairy tales” pushed by “high-faluting scientists” as a story of creation.

Similarly, Carson, a noted creationist, said he believed the theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“Now what about the big bang theory,” said Carson at speech to fellow Seventh-day Adventists titled “Celebration of Creation,” about the theory for the origin of the universe.

“I find the big bang, really quite fascinating. I mean, here you have all these high-faluting scientists and they’re saying it was this gigantic explosion and everything came into perfect order. Now these are the same scientists that go around touting the second law of thermodynamics, which is entropy, which says that things move toward a state of disorganization.

“So now you’re gonna have this big explosion and everything becomes perfectly organized and when you ask them about it they say, ‘Well we can explain this, based on probability theory because if there’s enough big explosions, over a long period of time, billions and billions of years, one of them will be the perfect explosion,” continued Carson. “So I say what you’re telling me is if I blow a hurricane through a junkyard enough times over billions and billions of years, eventually after one of those hurricanes there will be a 747 fully loaded and ready to fly.”

Carson added that he believed the big bang was “even more ridiculous” because there is order to the universe.

“Well, I mean, it’s even more ridiculous than that ‘cause our solar system, not to mention the universe outside of that, is extraordinarily well organized, to the point where we can predict 70 years away when a comet is coming,” he said. “Now that type of organization to just come out of an explosion? I mean, you want to talk about fairy tales, that is amazing.”

Later, Carson said he personally believed Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct,” said Carson.

“Amazingly, there are a significant number of scientists who do not believe it but they’re afraid to say anything,” Carson added, saying he would be writing a book, “The Organ of Species,” that shows how the organs of the body refute evolution.

Ben Carson: Big Bang A Fairy Tale, Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The Devil

OMG, I can't imagine this man as president.

So let me get this straight. Back in 2008 a semi African-American with no birth certificate, no college transcripts, and a published book espousing his socialist ideals announces his candidacy for President of the United States of America. He so informs us that he will "fundamentally transform America".

And you saw no shit on your radar?

Yep, that's about it.

 

[Mr. H.]

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct.”

In a speech delivered in 2012, Ben Carson said the big bang theory was part of the “fairy tales” pushed by “high-faluting scientists” as a story of creation.

Similarly, Carson, a noted creationist, said he believed the theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“Now what about the big bang theory,” said Carson at speech to fellow Seventh-day Adventists titled “Celebration of Creation,” about the theory for the origin of the universe.

“I find the big bang, really quite fascinating. I mean, here you have all these high-faluting scientists and they’re saying it was this gigantic explosion and everything came into perfect order. Now these are the same scientists that go around touting the second law of thermodynamics, which is entropy, which says that things move toward a state of disorganization.

“So now you’re gonna have this big explosion and everything becomes perfectly organized and when you ask them about it they say, ‘Well we can explain this, based on probability theory because if there’s enough big explosions, over a long period of time, billions and billions of years, one of them will be the perfect explosion,” continued Carson. “So I say what you’re telling me is if I blow a hurricane through a junkyard enough times over billions and billions of years, eventually after one of those hurricanes there will be a 747 fully loaded and ready to fly.”

Carson added that he believed the big bang was “even more ridiculous” because there is order to the universe.

“Well, I mean, it’s even more ridiculous than that ‘cause our solar system, not to mention the universe outside of that, is extraordinarily well organized, to the point where we can predict 70 years away when a comet is coming,” he said. “Now that type of organization to just come out of an explosion? I mean, you want to talk about fairy tales, that is amazing.”

Later, Carson said he personally believed Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was encouraged by the devil.

“I personally believe that this theory that Darwin came up with was something that was encouraged by the adversary, and it has become what is scientifically, politically correct,” said Carson.

“Amazingly, there are a significant number of scientists who do not believe it but they’re afraid to say anything,” Carson added, saying he would be writing a book, “The Organ of Species,” that shows how the organs of the body refute evolution.

Ben Carson: Big Bang A Fairy Tale, Theory Of Evolution Encouraged By The Devil

OMG, I can't imagine this man as president.

So let me get this straight. Back in 2008 a semi African-American with no birth certificate, no college transcripts, and a published book espousing his socialist ideals announces his candidacy for President of the United States of America. He so informs us that he will "fundamentally transform America".

And you saw no shit on your radar?

Yep, that's about it.

Did I ask you?

Take a back seat on the Brotch Bus.

 

[daws101]

There are many holes in the current 'accepted' theories. Too many refuse to acknowledge that though. Just like the 'Global Warming scam', they've declared the 'Science Settled.' A very unscientific conclusion.

You wouldn't know science if it bitch slapped you.

You're very dumb.

No pauli as always it's you ,GW is settled science , you for reasons of mental illness will not accept it.

No dummy, it isn't 'settled science.' But you for reasons of mental illness will not accept it.

bullshit, imitation is the highest of flattery..

Here's the Climate Deniers' Newest—and Worst—Argument
http://time.com/4041457/donald-trump-muslim-comments/


There are few things more satisfying than when people you’re arguing with say something manifestly wrong or tone-deaf. It’s the polemical equivalent of getting a big, fat fastball right right in your sweet spot. Just swing away with a look of disdain or checkable fact and the home run trot is yours.

Alas, that happens less often than one might like, but there’s nothing that stops you from pretending your adversary said something dumb and then pouncing on the imaginary remark. Thus we had the “You didn’t build that” and “Let Detroit go bankrupt” silliness of the 2012 Presidential campaign, in which both President Obama and Mitt Romney were pilloried for saying things they never actually said—or at least didn’t mean—at all. And so, too, we have the “Climate science is settled” charade, in which climate change deniers hand-select four words environmental scientists often do say, reframe those words to mean something else entirely, and then beat the scientists up for faux-saying it.

We saw the examplar of this ignoble formula earlier in the year when Charles Krauthammer, writing in the Washington Post, conceded that CO2 emissions aren’t good for the planet, but declared, “I also believe that those scientists who pretend to know exactly what this will cause in 20, 30 or 50 years are white-coated propagandists.” As I observed at the time, these white-coated propagandists are actually white-coated strawmen, since virtually all credible scientists acknowledge that climate systems are far, far too complex to analyze with precise accuracy. Do environmental researchers and green politicians ever say the science is “settled?” Yes they do—but they mean that the fake debate over whether climate change is a vast hoax is finished. They don’t mean there’s no work ahead.

Krauthammer, of course, is not a climate scientist—which gives him at least a small excuse. The same cannot be said of Steven E. Koonin, whose recent piece in the Wall Street Journal took a more nuanced approach to making the same point. Koonin is director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University and a former Energy Department undersecretary during Obama’s first term. Yet he runs with the same dishonest baton Krauthammer did.

 

[daws101]

The Pope's advisers are some of the most radical left wingers on the planet. One at his right hand side is a Merkel adviser.

Remember Wormtongue?

Yuppers that's who he has surrounded himself with.

butthurt much?

 

[daws101]

I'm a former catholic. I left the church for many reasons and still do love her but this Pope is an asshole.

You have to understand who the motherfuckers are that are advising the socialist idiot.

so much for Christian good will .

 

[daws101]

You wouldn't know science if it bitch slapped you.

You're very dumb.

No pauli as always it's you ,GW is settled science , you for reasons of mental illness will not accept it.

Science is never settled. That's the beauty of the mind at work here.

Yeah, even the theory of evolution has many holes. It's far from settled. However, i don't think the theory is spawned from the Devil.

But it is used for such.

And you are really talking to someone who has crawled thru the OT so many times it would make your head spin.

And my husband really is a UofT graduate cum laude my science go to guy. Hey I am just the rocker in the family. I only made hits with rockers and country singers.

When I talk about AGW I only demand a five day weather forecast.

are you claiming to be in the biz? why do I smell poser bullshit?

 

[daws101]

I'm a former catholic. I left the church for many reasons and still do love her but this Pope is an asshole.

You have to understand who the motherfuckers are that are advising the socialist idiot.

Asshole? Motherfuckers? Gee, what seems to be the problem?

The Pope is an asshole. I think I made it perfectly clear. He's a socialist mother fucker from South America who by the way ..............led to many being killed.

Do you know his history?

Really. Do you know his history?

Pope Francis Biography
Pope (1936–)

• 
  

Early Life and Education
Jorge Mario Bergoglio was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on December 17, 1936, to Italian immigrants. As a young man, Bergoglio underwent surgery to remove part of one of his lungs due to serious infection. He graduated from a technical school as a chemical technician before beginning training at the Diocesan Seminary of Villa Devoto. In March 1958, he entered the novitiate of the Society of Jesus.

Bergoglio taught literature and psychology at Immaculate Conception College in Santa Fé in 1964 and 1965, and also taught the same subjects at the Colegio del Salvatore in Buenos Aires in 1966. He studied theology and received a degree from the Colegio of San José from 1967 to 1970, and finished his doctoral thesis in theology in Freiburg, Germany in 1986.


Pope John Paul II, named the cardinal-priest of Saint Robert Bellarmino. In 2005, he was named president of the Bishops' Conference of Argentina, serving in that position until 2011.


Entering Priesthood
Ordained as a priest in December 1969, Bergoglio began serving as Jesuit provincial of Argentina in 1973. He has said that initially, his mother did not support his decision to enter the priesthood, despite the fact that she was a devout Catholic. By the time he was ordained, however, she accepted his calling and asked for his blessing at the end of his ordination ceremony. He later returned to his alma mater, the Colegio of San José, where he served as rector (1980-86) as well as a professor of theology.

On May 20, 1992, Bergoglio was named titular bishop of Auca and auxiliary of Buenos Aires; he was ordained into that post a week later. In February 1998, he became archbishop of Buenos Aires, succeeding Antonio Quarracino. Three years later, in February 2001, he was elevated to cardinal by Pope John Paul II, named the cardinal-priest of Saint Robert Bellarmino. In 2005, he was named president of the Bishops' Conference of Argentina, serving in that position until 2011.

After Pope John Paul II's death in April 2005, Bergoglio reportedly received the second-most votes in the 2005 papal conclave; Pope Benedict XVI (Joseph Ratzinger) was chosen as Pope John Paul's successor.



http://www.biography.com/people/pope-francis-21152349#entering-priesthood

yep he's Satan's go to guy alright.

 

[daws101]

How did we come to be? Still an unanswered question. We have some theories, but they're still just theories. People just need to understand that. We're still searching for the answer.

oh no not the we don't know jack shit about our origins so it must be the work of an imaginary sky faire ploy!

 

[g5000]

What is your favorite dog, or cat? Do you have a child, would you say they look more like you or your spouse... their parents or your, maybe a combination of all of you?

Maybe your children if you have any look nothing like you, however maybe if yo have children they are not yours at all...

Huh? The glaring problem with evolution is there is no fossil record.

Fossil evidence
Introduction to Human Evolution | The Smithsonian Institution's Human Origins Program

Better study up, there are two huge gaps that cannot be accounted for by fossil records

You obviously don't understand how lucky we are to have the amount of fossils we do, gaps are to be expected.

Young Earthers cry, "There is no transitional fossil between X and Z!" And then when transitional fossil Y is found, they cry, "There is no transitional fossil between X and Y!"

I damn near broke my face laughing when Sassy said, "Better study up..."

 

[daws101]

Jasenovac. I'm sure it is Jasenovac.

Working on the ethnic cleansing of Jews in Lviv right no so this is sort of a side issue for me. But I think Jasen or Jasanovac.

The priests ran the death camp.

really ?
Priest Barracks of Dachau Concentration Camp
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Polish prisoners in Dachau toast their liberation from the camp. Poles constituted the largest ethnic group in the camp and the largest proportion of those imprisoned in the Priest Barracks of Dachau.
The Priest Barracks of Dachau Concentration (in German Pfarrerblock, or Priesterblock) incarcerated clergy who had opposed the Nazi regime of Adolf Hitler. From December 1940, Berlin ordered the transfer of clerical prisoners held at other camps, and Dachau became the centre for imprisonment of clergymen. Of a total of 2,720 clerics recorded as imprisoned at Dachau some 2,579 (or 94.88%) were Roman Catholics. Among the other denominations, there were 109 Evangelicals, 22 Greek Orthodox, 8 Old Catholics and Mariavites and 2 Muslims.


Priest Barracks of Dachau Concentration Camp - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[daws101]

How did we come to be? Still an unanswered question. We have some theories, but they're still just theories. People just need to understand that. We're still searching for the answer.

Didn't God create us about 6,000 years ago? I thought that was settled science.

it is

 

[g5000]

How did we come to be? Still an unanswered question. We have some theories, but they're still just theories. People just need to understand that. We're still searching for the answer.

A Theory is the highest state a scientific postulation can achieve. What you snidely mean by "just theory" is not what science means by Theory.

That's the thing about science. They never say, "That settles it." They are open to being proven wrong or to finding a better explanation for the way things work.

The Theory of Evolution has a mountain of evidence to support it. And like any theory, it's beginnings had flaws which have been steadily refined and improved over time. But nothing has come along to suggest the overarching principle is wrong.

If a postulate is made the Earth is more than 6,000 years old, and the current scientific tools put the age of the Earth at 10 billion years, and then advancements in our tools show the Earth is NOT 10 billion years old, that does not prove the Earth is 6,000 years old. But that is how Young Earthers think, when in fact our better tools show the Earth is much older than 10 billion years.

If a flaw is found in the Theory of Evolution, that does not prove Creationism. That is seriously erroneous thinking.

 

[paulitician]

How did we come to be? Still an unanswered question. We have some theories, but they're still just theories. People just need to understand that. We're still searching for the answer.

A Theory is the highest state a scientific postulation can achieve. What you snidely mean by "theory" is not what science means by Theory.

That's the thing about science. They never say, "That settles it." They are open to being proven wrong or to finding a better explanation for the way things work.

The Theory of Evolution has a mountain of evidence to support it. And like any theory, it's beginnings had flaws which have been steadily refined and improved over time. But nothing has come along to suggest the overarching principle is wrong.

Fair enough. I'm not with Carson on this one. I don't think a Devil has anything to do with it. However, i do realize that we're still searching for the answer. The theory of Evolution has a lot of holes in it. We have to continue searching for the answer. The Science is not 'Settled.'

 

[David_42]

How did we come to be? Still an unanswered question. We have some theories, but they're still just theories. People just need to understand that. We're still searching for the answer.

A Theory is the highest state a scientific postulation can achieve. What you snidely mean by "just theory" is not what science means by Theory.

That's the thing about science. They never say, "That settles it." They are open to being proven wrong or to finding a better explanation for the way things work.

The Theory of Evolution has a mountain of evidence to support it. And like any theory, it's beginnings had flaws which have been steadily refined and improved over time. But nothing has come along to suggest the overarching principle is wrong.

If a postulate is made the Earth is more than 6,000 years old, and the current scientific tools put the age of the Earth at 10 billion years, and then advancements in our tools show the Earth is NOT 10 billion years old, that does not prove the Earth is 6,000 years old. But that is how Young Earthers think, when in fact our better tools show the Earth is much older than 10 billion years.

If a flaw is found in the Theory of Evolution, that does not prove Creationism. That is seriously erroneous thinking.

Just like AGW

 

[g5000]

How did we come to be? Still an unanswered question. We have some theories, but they're still just theories. People just need to understand that. We're still searching for the answer.

A Theory is the highest state a scientific postulation can achieve. What you snidely mean by "theory" is not what science means by Theory.

That's the thing about science. They never say, "That settles it." They are open to being proven wrong or to finding a better explanation for the way things work.

The Theory of Evolution has a mountain of evidence to support it. And like any theory, it's beginnings had flaws which have been steadily refined and improved over time. But nothing has come along to suggest the overarching principle is wrong.

Fair enough. I'm not with Carson on this one. I don't think a Devil has anything to do with it. However, i do realize that we're still searching for the answer. The theory of Evolution has a lot of holes in it. We have to continue searching for the answer. The Science is not 'Settled.'

The Theory of Evolution has nowhere near the number of holes the Young Earth nonsense does.

Isaac Asimov's famous Relativity of Wrong applies here.

"When people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Evolution = theory (scientific version, not guy holding The End is Near sign)
Gravity = theory (scientific version, not guy holding The End is Near sign)

Best advice, test only one of them from atop tall buildings...