Beloe Zlato! The most successive Russian girl band.

rupol, please don't confuse people with your peculiar perception of anything related to almost everything :)

I don't argue but only because it would be like to reform the whole Ukrainian educational system, i. e. some sort of Hercules achievements :)
It's not your fault, but it seems you in Ukraine have really some separate History and geography from the rest of Human kind :)
This is not an alternative history, and it is not a secret, it is just that you are not reading history, but agitational propaganda instead. Here Moscow is no different from Kiev, both sides lie. These are trivial facts: the Hetmanate was subordinate to Moscow, the western and part of central Ukraine was Lesser Poland, and it fought against the Hetmanate and the Turks, who were defeated near Vienna. Novorossiya is the former Novoserbia, which was not in the Donbass, but in the Kirovograd region and so on. It's in a regular fucking history, not an alternate.
 
I would think Russian would have been more influenced by Turkic languages. But in any case, there seems to be a certain degree of isolation with common words that don't exist in other languages, like "xorosho".

But to get back to the topic, is there anything political about the band that the thread is about? I didn't notice anything, but don't know anything about them. Having the word "white" in the name does not make them white power.

Moscow and the Golden Horde: The Mongol Impact on Medieval ...​

https://books.google.se › books



Charles J. Halperin · 1987 · ‎History
.... the language of the Muscovite bureaucracy was a kind of meta-Turkic, a hyperliteral calque of Turco-Tatar formulae and forms ...
 
by Turkic languages
By the way, no one really knows the origin of this word. It is clear that this has nothing to do with ancient Turan and Turkestan. The only identical name is found in the Torks, they apparently inhabited the region of the Hetmanate, which later joined Moscow.
It had something to do with the Ottoman Empire. But that Moscow was more Prussian-Lithuanian than "Turan", and they closely cooperated with the Serbs. By the way, Serbian is even rougher than Russian in comparison with Ukrainian.
 
I think that Central Asia and Siberia mostly talked in Indo-Aryan languages, because Indo-Aryan peoples lived there, and Slavic-speaking peoples initially came from there.
Tajiks now speak Iranian Farsi, but this language appeared only under the Sassanids, and before that they spoke Bactrian Aryan. And the Uzbeks now speak Turkic, but they are their neighbors, and they differ little from them.
 
Last edited:
You can consider such a collision. New Uygur is considered Turkic, but Old Uygur writing is a variant of Sogdian, and Sogdiana was an Indo-Aryan or Indo-Iranian country.

Therefore, everything there is very incomprehensible with these "Turkic" languages, it is not clear what they are in general and how they appeared, except for the Turkicization of Central Asia in the 20th century.
 
Last edited:
Most likely this is the language of the Oghuz, which could have been similar to the Torks and Ottomans, but this was not the main population of Central Asia and Western Siberia.
 
rupol, you may be interested in reading books of Lev Gumilev, the greatest Russian specialist on Turkic peoples
This is an absolute clown at the court of the Bolsheviks. He only wrote fairy tales. For example, Oirats are not Kalmyks but Altaians, for example, no "Tengrianism" is recorded in any reliable sources and so on, I do not want to discuss the nonsense of this freak. Perhaps the reason for his fantasies is that he was pardoned in the 30s personally by "Father" Stalin at the request of some Jew who was familiar to his mother.
 
Absolutely all Indo-European languages passed through Central Asia, all ancient Indo-European languages descend directly from the Proto-Toharyan language
 
Where and when the Evenks appeared there is another question, they come from Transbaikalia. But they are not the founders of Ancient Turan.
 
Moghulistan, the country of Genghis Khan, is modern Uyghuristan (Eastern Turkestan occupied by China), and it was never inhabited by the Evenks. And to this day, it is so. Uyghurs are living there not Evenks
 
Freak Gumilev wrote that these were Oguz tribes. But Uyguristan is not included in the range of the Oguz languages, and the Oguzes themselves, for example, the Turkmens, are not Evenks.

Oghuz_languages.PNG
 
Now, instead of the Altaians, they are trying to slip the Yakuts into the Media. And as the Altai language, they present some kind of Turkic. But in reality Altai people speak Russian and look like this

rG3ehWjYRkq7Wl52O_fT3_1TJVBvl4w6Yy9F9yKcGA4ikcfaAPFlMi5LgfH4Gyd_4qS1kM9JOTTagxxTasj4_zgFZtl_-_5mexxwqvbYhcbH0lV9dxYECdNjmot7y1iGUghZNkasd8ycsjIXGA4TUQcyKlDo9DD1h0FCES09FLaovrg9tV_k9KWXKFrTn-8lSjKUfqIzvxneOgE


And this is the Oirats
 
Except more undernourished. Either "thin is in" across the Motherland, or they missed a few meals.
That is the stupidest thing I ever heard. L. This is not 1960. Pretty soon we will be starving in the US. Russia is thriving. These girls obviously live on farms. How could they go hungry. I saw a video where one is carrying a beautiful looking loaf of bread, tractors and farm machinery all around. They probably have family orchards and dairy coop. I seen them with baskets of eggs. Last week I paid 8 dollars for a doesand. Forget the woke propaganda.
Except more undernourished. Either "thin is in" across the Motherland, or they missed a few meals.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top