Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
Classic fakery. This shill is so disengenous they claim we can actually call and talk to the Atty. General. lmao.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Yeah.....that is really some hard evidence. Send that to Barr.....:auiqs.jpg:
A fact is a fact.
Another fact is that you are mentally ill.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.


More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?


Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.


Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.


Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.


Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?


Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.


I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"


YOU MUST BE REALLY SLOW!

You are mentally retarded.

I'm actually considering showing a psychiatrist various user postings.


If you need Barr's address....let me know.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.

Or......you could just acknowledge the results of both the election and the DOJ investigations rather than clinging to incoherent ramblings of a youtube conspiracy theorist.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Yeah.....that is really some hard evidence. Send that to Barr.....:auiqs.jpg:
A fact is a fact.
Another fact is that you are mentally ill.

And you are....IGNORED! BYE BYE
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.


More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?


Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.


Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.


Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.


Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?


Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.


I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"


YOU MUST BE REALLY SLOW!

You are mentally retarded.

I'm actually considering showing a psychiatrist various user postings.


If you need Barr's address....let me know.

The fat fuck won't even release the FBI's dossier on 9/11.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.

Or......you could just acknowledge the results of both the election and the DOJ investigations rather than clinging to incoherent ramblings of a youtube conspiracy theorist.
dimcrap double speak buffoonery babblery nonspeak jiggard smash.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Yeah.....that is really some hard evidence. Send that to Barr.....:auiqs.jpg:
A fact is a fact.
Another fact is that you are mentally ill.

And you are....IGNORED! BYE BYE
You too, asshole.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Yeah.....that is really some hard evidence. Send that to Barr.....:auiqs.jpg:
A fact is a fact.
Another fact is that you are mentally ill.

And you are....IGNORED! BYE BYE
You too, asshole.
He showed you, dinney? lol
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.

Or......you could just acknowledge the results of both the election and the DOJ investigations rather than clinging to incoherent ramblings of a youtube conspiracy theorist.
Has anybody reported on the details of the investigation?
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.


More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?


Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.


Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.


Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.


Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?


Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.


I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"


YOU MUST BE REALLY SLOW!

You are mentally retarded.

I'm actually considering showing a psychiatrist various user postings.


If you need Barr's address....let me know.

The fat fuck won't even release the FBI's dossier on 9/11.


So now Barr is 'that fat fuck'.

Its kinda fun to watch them eat their own.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.

Or......you could just acknowledge the results of both the election and the DOJ investigations rather than clinging to incoherent ramblings of a youtube conspiracy theorist.
Has anybody reported on the details of the investigation?

Yes. William Barr.

Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election. Barr was headed to the White House later for a previously scheduled meeting.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.

But hey, don't let the Attorney General get in the way of your rambling conspiracy theorist on youtube.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Yeah.....that is really some hard evidence. Send that to Barr.....:auiqs.jpg:
A fact is a fact.
Another fact is that you are mentally ill.

And you are....IGNORED! BYE BYE
You too, asshole.
He showed you, dinney? lol
I had JimWit on Ignore for over 2 years because he's a 1/10th second note of moronacy.
He's more of an idiot than ever.
I don't even know why I haven't put the 10 other assholes on Iggy.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.

Or......you could just acknowledge the results of both the election and the DOJ investigations rather than clinging to incoherent ramblings of a youtube conspiracy theorist.
Has anybody reported on the details of the investigation?

Yes. William Barr.

Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election. Barr was headed to the White House later for a previously scheduled meeting.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.
Link?
You know...like you always ask for.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.


More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?


Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.


Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.


Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.


Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?


Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.


I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"


YOU MUST BE REALLY SLOW!

You are mentally retarded.

I'm actually considering showing a psychiatrist various user postings.


If you need Barr's address....let me know.

The fat fuck won't even release the FBI's dossier on 9/11.


So now Barr is 'that fat fuck'.

Its kinda fun to watch them eat their own.

I never liked Barr from the start and I'd be shocked if you can find a post where I did.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.

Or......you could just acknowledge the results of both the election and the DOJ investigations rather than clinging to incoherent ramblings of a youtube conspiracy theorist.
Has anybody reported on the details of the investigation?

Yes. William Barr.

Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election. Barr was headed to the White House later for a previously scheduled meeting.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.
Link?
You know...like you always ask for.

Link in the description.

Which you already know. You're merely looking an excuse to ignore the outcome.

Kinda like the election results.
 
These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.
There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.
It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.

Or......you could just acknowledge the results of both the election and the DOJ investigations rather than clinging to incoherent ramblings of a youtube conspiracy theorist.
Has anybody reported on the details of the investigation?

Yes. William Barr.

Barr said U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but they’ve uncovered no evidence that would change the outcome of the election. Barr was headed to the White House later for a previously scheduled meeting.

“To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” Barr told the AP.
Link?
You know...like you always ask for.

Link in the description.

Which you already know. You're merely looking an excuse to ignore the outcome.

Kinda like the election results.
Zero details on the investigation.
Only a broad statement.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.


More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.
The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?


Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.


Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.


Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.


Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?


Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.


I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"


YOU MUST BE REALLY SLOW!

You are mentally retarded.

I'm actually considering showing a psychiatrist various user postings.


If you need Barr's address....let me know.

The fat fuck won't even release the FBI's dossier on 9/11.


So now Barr is 'that fat fuck'.

Its kinda fun to watch them eat their own.

I never liked Barr from the start and I'd be shocked if you can find a post where I did.


Of course not. You and all the other conservatives have always hated him.

Its merely a grand coincidence that this hatred manifested among you all immediately after he revealed that there's no evidence of widespread election fraud.

Think of the odds.
 

Forum List

Back
Top