Barr: No evidence of fraud that’d change election outcome

[miketx]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

 

[Skylar]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

 

[JimH52]

You can bet the farm that trump will not take any questions on this. I mean, how can he slam the man that saved his neck with the Mueller Report. trump should be in jail. Hopefully the NY AG and the SDNY will put he and his criminal family there.

 

[Indeependent]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.

The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?

Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.

Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.

Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.

Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?

Watch the video, retard.
But you can't because you lack the emotional and intellectual ability to do so.
It's less than 10 minutes but that's about 10 minutes longer than the average analysis on CNN.

 

[Norman]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

 

[Indeependent]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.

The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?

Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.

Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.

Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.

Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?

Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.

I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"

 

[Skylar]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.

 

[JimH52]

The Trump campaign has been using shady legal language buried in the solicitations to donors.

Trump Has Raised $170 Million Since Election Day: Reports

Trump supporters are gullible morons!

Maybe this announcement from Bill Barr will dry up the money cow for trump? Whatcha think?

 

[Skylar]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.

The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?

Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.

Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.

Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.

Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?

Watch the video, retard.
But you can't because you lack the emotional and intellectual ability to do so.
It's less than 10 minutes but that's about 10 minutes longer than the average analysis on CNN.

I'll watch the state certifications, thank you.

You enjoy your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist.

 

[JimH52]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.

The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?

Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.

Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.

Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.

Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?

Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.

I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"

YOU MUST BE REALLY SLOW!

 

[Indeependent]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.

There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

 

[anynameyouwish]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.

barr is a commy marxist socialist who hates god and America

 

[Norman]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.

The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?

Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.

Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.

Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.

Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?

Watch the video, retard.
But you can't because you lack the emotional and intellectual ability to do so.
It's less than 10 minutes but that's about 10 minutes longer than the average analysis on CNN.

I'll watch the state certifications, thank you.

You enjoy your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist.

I can't see any interview, what I see are couple quotes. The interview is from AP and I can't find a full interview there either, just a few quotes.

So where are you listening to this interview?

 

[Indeependent]

WASHINGTON (AP) — Attorney General William Barr said Tuesday the Justice Department has not uncovered evidence of widespread voter fraud that would change the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election. Barr's comments, in an interview with the The...

www.yahoo.com

More kindling for the conspiracy bonfire. Apparently Barr is 'in on it' too.

The case to be presented to SCOTUS is not fraud.
Look it up.

So are you acknowledging the lack of evidence of fraud......or just ignoring the OP entirely?

Fraud was used by Rudy to get to SCOTUS ASAP.
Watch the entire video or stick your uneducated brain up your ass.

Or....I'll just read Barr's interview. As its far more relevant to the outcome of the election than a conspiracy theorist on youtube.

But you keep clinging to batshit conspiracy videos. I'll keep watching the states certify Biden victories.

Deal?

Since when is a case presented to SCOTUS a conspiracy?
You are proof that Liberals have the attention span of a gnat.

Or....that I find election results and the Attorney General's acknowledgment of a lack of evidence of fraud to be more relevant to the election....

....than then incoherent ramblings of some random conspiracy theorist on youtube.

As would any rational person

The case to go to SCOTUS is not based on fraud.
You have a 1 second attention span.
I wouldn’t trust you even if if you posted something valid.
I hope you’re not like this at work.

Tell us, Perry Mason, what is the case going to the USSC?

Why are you asking Indy? He's just apeing what the youtube conspiracy theorist told him to think.

I didn't think it was possible, but some of these people are dumber than they sound.

Coming from a poster who's most intellectual statement of any given day consists of 3 words, "Orange Man Bad!"

YOU MUST BE REALLY SLOW!

You are mentally retarded.

I'm actually considering showing a psychiatrist various user postings.

 

[miketx]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

There isn't one, my guess its that it's just more media fakery. The skank said it was in the OP but all that is there are claims that Barr said this and Barr said that. If there is one there I didn't see it.

 

[rightwinger]

Some disloyal Republican needs to be fired

How dare he say the US holds honest elections

 

[Skylar]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.

There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.

 

[JimH52]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.

There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Yeah.....that is really some hard evidence. Send that to Barr.....

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Nixon's AG ended up in prison.

I suspect Barr is going to be asked an awful lot of questions.

Trump won't be there to pardon.

Welcome back Rtard! How ya been?

 

[Indeependent]

These shills are gonna start going down on each other any minute now.

Or......I can just enjoy Barr's interview.

Where is the interview?

Link in the OP.

And again, Norman. You don't need an excuse to ignore Barr. Just do what you do with any source that contradicts your silly conspiracies.

There is not one county in the US where one party gets even 80% of the vote over the other party.
A Red County will be between 55-60% R.
A Blue County will be between 55-60% D.

90% of a county voting for one candidate is 100% fraud.

Did your rambling youtube conspiracy theorist tell you that?

You might want to check with the Attorney General and the DOJ investigations regarding evidence of fraud.

It's less than 10 minutes long and you're too mentally disturbed to watch it.
You'd rather repeat the same post here for 2 months every 30 seconds.
Shows how off kilt you are.