Barr did not say there was no widespread election fraud, as falsely reported.

munkle

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
951
Reaction score
1,102
Points
910
OP is right the media made it sound like a conclusion of investigation, not on ongoing update. "To date" changes entire meaning of headline. We are now USSR where people read Pravda just for laughs.
 

Bootney Lee Farnsworth

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
28,148
Reaction score
12,134
Points
1,100
Location
Tejas
So he did say exactly what you said he didn't say.

we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.

Do those words mean something differently to you in your language?
"We haven't seen" is what he said. "There is no voter fraud" is what they reported.

Do I really need to explain why this is completely dishonest reporting?
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
120,805
Reaction score
21,099
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
So he did say exactly what you said he didn't say.

we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.

Do those words mean something differently to you in your language?
"We haven't seen" is what he said. "There is no voter fraud" is what they reported.

Do I really need to explain why this is completely dishonest reporting?
Yeah, you do. Show us where a report said that.

I put that to the OP and he ran away.
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
24,529
Reaction score
5,492
Points
215
So he did say exactly what you said he didn't say.

we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.

Do those words mean something differently to you in your language?
"We haven't seen" is what he said. "There is no voter fraud" is what they reported.

Do I really need to explain why this is completely dishonest reporting?
What was reported is exactly what he said. They have seen nothing to substantiate any voter fraud.
 

wamose

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
6,836
Reaction score
5,977
Points
2,015
Location
Pennsylvania
Nobody in their right mind can say that Barr made a good faith effort to get to the truth. Barr protected his dept, period. He's as bad as the worst of them. He enabled them to run out the clock on the most important investigations in US history
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,023
Points
1,130
Nobody in their right mind can say that Barr made a good faith effort to get to the truth. Barr protected his dept, period. He's as bad as the worst of them. He enabled them to run out the clock on the most important investigations in US history
So Barr is in on it too, huh?
 

wamose

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
6,836
Reaction score
5,977
Points
2,015
Location
Pennsylvania
Nobody in their right mind can say that Barr made a good faith effort to get to the truth. Barr protected his dept, period. He's as bad as the worst of them. He enabled them to run out the clock on the most important investigations in US history
So Barr is in on it too, huh?
He wasn't in on it. He's just too much of a pussy to do what's right. I guess that's just as bad as being in on it.
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,023
Points
1,130
Nobody in their right mind can say that Barr made a good faith effort to get to the truth. Barr protected his dept, period. He's as bad as the worst of them. He enabled them to run out the clock on the most important investigations in US history
So Barr is in on it too, huh?
He wasn't in on it. He's just too much of a pussy to do what's right. I guess that's just as bad as being in on it.
Or......there's no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Occam's Razor may be a good fit for this.
 

Rogue AI

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
846
Reaction score
1,035
Points
873
Location
Wisconsin
Barr never said they were done investigating either. Yet liberals pretend it's case closed. Totally dishonest and misleading.
 

Lesh

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
21,306
Reaction score
5,096
Points
290
OP
Angelo

Angelo

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
26,563
Reaction score
12,410
Points
1,100
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
Speaking of investigations, ya gotta love the NY Times headline;

Barr Makes Durham a Special Counsel in a Bid to Entrench Scrutiny of the Russia Inquiry
That occurred in mid OCTOBER

So where is this vaunted report?
Mr. Durham never fulfilled President Trump’s and his supporters’ expectations that he would bring to light some significant wrongdoing against the president before the election. But the step appeared likely to create a headache for whoever Mr. Biden appoints as attorney general, who would take over supervision of Mr. Durham’s continuing work.
(From the NYT article)
 

Lesh

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2016
Messages
21,306
Reaction score
5,096
Points
290
The OP shot himself in the ass in his own post LOL
 

Pogo

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
120,805
Reaction score
21,099
Points
2,190
Location
Fennario
The OP shot himself in the ass in his own post LOL
You can show me where Barr said ;
" there was no widespread election fraud"
any day now.
Actually YOU can show the class where anybody reported that's what he said.

You know, as your strawman OP dreamed.

Any year now.
 
OP
Angelo

Angelo

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
26,563
Reaction score
12,410
Points
1,100
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
Actually YOU can show the class where anybody reported that's what he said.

You know, as your strawman OP dreamed.

Any year now.

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

 

Ikari

Rookie
Joined
Dec 2, 2020
Messages
5
Reaction score
14
Points
1
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
Which is so strange, since apparently there exists the massive amount of evidence and 100's of affidavits that support the massive fraud that was capable of switching the election from Trump to Biden. I mean, given all this terrific, obvious, and prolific evidence you'd think the DOJ would have gotten wind of some of it by now.
lol
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,023
Points
1,130
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
Which is so strange, since apparently there exists the massive amount of evidence and 100's of affidavits that support the massive fraud that was capable of switching the election from Trump to Biden. I mean, given all this terrific, obvious, and prolific evidence you'd think the DOJ would have gotten wind of some of it by now.
lol
You'd think! Odd that Trump's team is so bizarrely reluctant to present this evidence in court. Or to even allege that fraud ever occurred.
 

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
33,818
Reaction score
18,276
Points
1,915
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
Barr didn’t name Powell specifically but said: “There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”
To quote your own OP, refuting the name of the thread: "To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.

So if Barr goes to the Indy 500 with a bag over his head and says he hasn't seen any evidence of widespread car racing there, will you conclude that he affirmed that no cars were there, Dipstick?
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top