Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"We haven't seen" is what he said. "There is no voter fraud" is what they reported.So he did say exactly what you said he didn't say.
we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.
Do those words mean something differently to you in your language?
"We haven't seen" is what he said. "There is no voter fraud" is what they reported.So he did say exactly what you said he didn't say.
we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.
Do those words mean something differently to you in your language?
Do I really need to explain why this is completely dishonest reporting?
"We haven't seen" is what he said. "There is no voter fraud" is what they reported.So he did say exactly what you said he didn't say.
we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.
Do those words mean something differently to you in your language?
Do I really need to explain why this is completely dishonest reporting?
So Barr is in on it too, huh?Nobody in their right mind can say that Barr made a good faith effort to get to the truth. Barr protected his dept, period. He's as bad as the worst of them. He enabled them to run out the clock on the most important investigations in US history
He wasn't in on it. He's just too much of a pussy to do what's right. I guess that's just as bad as being in on it.So Barr is in on it too, huh?Nobody in their right mind can say that Barr made a good faith effort to get to the truth. Barr protected his dept, period. He's as bad as the worst of them. He enabled them to run out the clock on the most important investigations in US history
He wasn't in on it. He's just too much of a pussy to do what's right. I guess that's just as bad as being in on it.So Barr is in on it too, huh?Nobody in their right mind can say that Barr made a good faith effort to get to the truth. Barr protected his dept, period. He's as bad as the worst of them. He enabled them to run out the clock on the most important investigations in US history
That occurred in mid OCTOBERSpeaking of investigations, ya gotta love the NY Times headline;
Barr Makes Durham a Special Counsel in a Bid to Entrench Scrutiny of the Russia Inquiry
Barr Makes Durham a Special Counsel in a Bid to Entrench Scrutiny of the Russia Inquiry (Published 2020)
The move would leave the investigation into the Trump-Russia inquiry open when the Biden administration takes over.www.nytimes.com
Mr. Durham never fulfilled President Trump’s and his supporters’ expectations that he would bring to light some significant wrongdoing against the president before the election. But the step appeared likely to create a headache for whoever Mr. Biden appoints as attorney general, who would take over supervision of Mr. Durham’s continuing work.That occurred in mid OCTOBERSpeaking of investigations, ya gotta love the NY Times headline;
Barr Makes Durham a Special Counsel in a Bid to Entrench Scrutiny of the Russia Inquiry
Barr Makes Durham a Special Counsel in a Bid to Entrench Scrutiny of the Russia Inquiry (Published 2020)
The move would leave the investigation into the Trump-Russia inquiry open when the Biden administration takes over.www.nytimes.com
So where is this vaunted report?
You can show me where Barr said ;The OP shot himself in the ass in his own post LOL
You can show me where Barr said ;The OP shot himself in the ass in his own post LOL
" there was no widespread election fraud"
any day now.
Actually YOU can show the class where anybody reported that's what he said.
You know, as your strawman OP dreamed.
Any year now.
Which is so strange, since apparently there exists the massive amount of evidence and 100's of affidavits that support the massive fraud that was capable of switching the election from Trump to Biden. I mean, given all this terrific, obvious, and prolific evidence you'd think the DOJ would have gotten wind of some of it by now."To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
Which is so strange, since apparently there exists the massive amount of evidence and 100's of affidavits that support the massive fraud that was capable of switching the election from Trump to Biden. I mean, given all this terrific, obvious, and prolific evidence you'd think the DOJ would have gotten wind of some of it by now."To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
lol
I heard Seth Rich is looking into it.You'd think! Odd that Trump's team is so bizarrely reluctant to present this evidence in court. Or to even allege that fraud ever occurred.
I heard Seth Rich is looking into it.You'd think! Odd that Trump's team is so bizarrely reluctant to present this evidence in court. Or to even allege that fraud ever occurred.
To quote your own OP, refuting the name of the thread: "To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.Barr didn’t name Powell specifically but said: “There’s been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results. And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven’t seen anything to substantiate that.”