Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, you weren't being very clever. As well, your post trying to denigrate Mrs. Clinton is essentially off topic.Saying things that aren't true doesn't make them true: especially when it is someone like you saying it.Yup, Hillary doesn't drool or throw temper-tantrums unless questioning becomes too invasive.Hillary is smart and articulate-----but she seems a bit
overly ambitious and into herself. ----same seems true
of Obama
Wow, that really clever.
No, you weren't being very clever. As well, your post trying to denigrate Mrs. Clinton is essentially off topic.Saying things that aren't true doesn't make them true: especially when it is someone like you saying it.Yup, Hillary doesn't drool or throw temper-tantrums unless questioning becomes too invasive.Hillary is smart and articulate-----but she seems a bit
overly ambitious and into herself. ----same seems true
of Obama
Wow, that really clever.
I'm being honest. You aren't. You start a thread that has no basis in reality and you expect everyone to respond irrationally.This is the CDZ, not the place for slinging shit around. Your post is the type we see in ordinary threads, not the type that we should see here. The CDZ is meant for thoughtful, honest posts, not for being nasty and rude about a subject. If you cannot post an honest, thoughtful idea, then don't post here.
a sample of 800 people is not enough to represent all Americans
Because America is not a homogenous population. If it were, a sample of 800 would be plenty.a sample of 800 people is not enough to represent all Americans
Why not?
Because America is not a homogenous population. If it were, a sample of 800 would be plenty.a sample of 800 people is not enough to represent all Americans
Why not?
when you are talking error margins of 5% an answer of 18% or 13% are virtually equal.a sample of 800 people is not enough to represent all Americans
Why not?
It is a population of 250 millions: only those over 18, voting age, were polled.when you are talking error margins of 5% an answer of 18% or 13% are virtually equal.a sample of 800 people is not enough to represent all Americans
Why not?
With such close margins you should use a lower margin of error so as to make the results more meaningful with a plus or minus 2% m.o.e. for example.
For a population of 350 million to get a m.o.e of 2% with a 99% confidence level one needs a sample of at least 4147 people or more than 5 times the sample of this poll
According to Ranker, the most unpopular politician in America is Obama 3, followed by Reid 4, Pelosi 5, Bloomberg 6, Hillary 7 and finally McConnell 8.
One and two are all-of-them and Congress.
US Political Figures We Hate the Most 2013
There are about 255 million Americans 18 and older, so you are exaggerating. Howeve, the fact is that all polls take representative samples. And that is what this poll has done. Gallup Polls are considered valid and reliable. As well, the real point here, in this thead, is that most Americans do not feel about Obama or Mrs. Clinton the way the RW posters on this board represent it. The virulent hatred towards Obama and Clinton is NOT the norm. That's the point.I thought the same thing. Princeton = educated and liberal.Princeton, NJ.
'nuff said.
If this same poll were taken in an uneducated, RW area, the results would likely be very different.Barack Obama Hillary Clinton Extend Run as Most AdmiredResults for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Dec. 8-11, 2014, with a random sample of 805 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.
Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.
Answers came from all 50 states.
Thanks for posting this.
Really Luddly? You're not embarrassed by the sampling? If distributed evenly, that's 15.78 people in each state and D.C. And that somehow represents 316 million Americans?
Because America is not a homogenous population. If it were, a sample of 800 would be plenty.a sample of 800 people is not enough to represent all Americans
Why not?
No, it isn't about whatever makes me feel good. It's the reality, and the poll proves it and has proven it for years.There are about 255 million Americans 18 and older, so you are exaggerating. Howeve, the fact is that all polls take representative samples. And that is what this poll has done. Gallup Polls are considered valid and reliable. As well, the real point here, in this thead, is that most Americans do not feel about Obama or Mrs. Clinton the way the RW posters on this board represent it. The virulent hatred towards Obama and Clinton is NOT the norm. That's the point.I thought the same thing. Princeton = educated and liberal.
If this same poll were taken in an uneducated, RW area, the results would likely be very different.Barack Obama Hillary Clinton Extend Run as Most AdmiredResults for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Dec. 8-11, 2014, with a random sample of 805 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on the total sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. All reported margins of sampling error include computed design effects for weighting.
Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 50% cellphone respondents and 50% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cellular telephone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods.
Answers came from all 50 states.
Thanks for posting this.
Really Luddly? You're not embarrassed by the sampling? If distributed evenly, that's 15.78 people in each state and D.C. And that somehow represents 316 million Americans?
Whatever helps you sleep at night...
No, more liberals and progressives like Obama and Clinton.The respondents say who they do have a positive opinion of. That is what the poll reflects: who people like. And more people like Obama and Clinton than anyone else.Since the question is who you most admire, those that think they are lying cheats will not answer in the affirmative. This particular poll question does not gather information about people that have a negative opinion because that is not the question asked.It surveyed a cross section of people across the country: it is NOT a poll measuring only what "the population that admires them" thinks. What absolute nonsense it is to suggest so.Obama and H. Clinton are very polarizing people with extremely high name recognition. This pole is measuring only the population that admires them, it does not measure the population that thinks they are lying cheats. Obama and H. Clinton are both very much admired (far left democrats) and disdained ( far right republicans).There are about 255 million Americans 18 and older, so you are exaggerating. Howeve, the fact is that all polls take representative samples. And that is what this poll has done. Gallup Polls are considered valid and reliable. As well, the real point here, in this thead, is that most Americans do not feel about Obama or Mrs. Clinton the way the RW posters on this board represent it. The virulent hatred towards Obama and Clinton is NOT the norm. That's the point.Really Luddly? You're not embarrassed by the sampling? If distributed evenly, that's 15.78 people in each state and D.C. And that somehow represents 316 million Americans?
