Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nah, we don't. These are just your pre-emptive excuses, for when your fantasies collide with reality.We have a double standard justice system.
Democrats have done that too...Right up until a committee run by a Republican issues them. Let's be clear.
www.politico.com
Both democrats and republicans voted to charge Bannnon with cmptempt of congress.
Yep. But a difference:Democrats have done that too...
House panel votes to hold Clinton tech aide Bryan Pagliano in contempt
"Mr. Pagliano is defending a critical principal of individual liberty and the constitutional right of a private citizen to resist partisan political forces masquerading as proper government functions," Pagliano's lawyer writes.
i can, sure. can you? i asked you what his crime was and you chime your usual bullshit in and DO NOT answer the simple question.So... you CAN read, right? You CAN rad the thread title... right? You HAVE heard about these events....
...right?
Which was a pretty stupid question, considering you opened a thread with it described right in the title. I don't know what else to tell you.i asked you what his crime was
Given that it has been optional going back, why not?From what I'm seeing here, the Trumpsters appear to believe that showing for subpoenas should be optional going forward.
It's already a fucking joke. It was a joke LONG before Bannon.Yeah. If not, they should just get rid of it. It would be a joke at that point.
Another difference is that Pagliano had already testified before Congress on the very same matter. But still, Democrats voted against him being held in contempt in a subcommittee vote. Also unlike with Bannon, the full House never voted on the matter.Yep. But a difference:
From that article:
"An attorney for Pagliano, Mark MacDougall, streesed that his client was ready to appear behind closed doors, but would not be part of a public spectacle."
This is what is being offered to Bannon from the start.
It was never optional.Given that it has been optional going back, why not?
They didn't ignore them. Holder and Obama fought one. Clinton aids plead the 5th.Obozo and his wingman ignored subpoenas. Hillary ignored subpoenas
So Trump Humpers are ok with Trump Humpers breaking the law, as long as, it doesn't result in showing the crooked shit that Lord Trump has done.And, now what?
Who is going to carry out his arrest?
No way in hell does this look good for anyone, especially given the nose thumbing done in the Obama administration.
Banana Republic
Andy McCabe lied to Congress. Anthony Fauci lied to Congress. John Brennan lied to Congress. Why weren't they held to account?Nah, we don't. These are just your pre-emptive excuses, for when your fantasies collide with reality.
Get the decision that aligns with your childish fetishes? Justice has been done.
Don't get the decision you like, because your silly little fantasies do not align with reality? Must be a big conspiracy of the entire world to make you look stupid!
Rise, repeat. Forever. This is who you are, now. Trump has converted you.
Baloney, she testified to Congress for hours on end and turn over thousands of pages of subpoenaed documents.
Trumpybuddies are afraid to turn over documents and testify for two basic reasons. They're afraid of Trumpybear and they're fright fucked of Trumpyberra.
And it was legal, because of the clumsy subpoena of the republican hacks. Whoops.The bitch destroyed subpoenaed hard drives with a fucking hammer and deleted subpoenaed emails and she walked.
Fuck off.
And it was legal, because of the clumsy subpoena of the republican hacks. Whoops.
Kinda sticks in yer craw, i bet. I can see why.
