Bakers fined for not working homosexual "wedding" continue fighting for their freedoms

[rightwinger]

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

Where is there a constitutional right to a wedding cake?

Where was the constitutional right to be served at a lunch counter?

As I have stated before that was a symptom of law mandated enforced discrimination, both political and economic. It does not compare to a couple having to find another baker for their wedding cake.

And I have a feeling you would approve if this showed a picture of those bakers being covered in crap. You are far closer in ideology to Bull Conner than I am.

It was the beginning of the end for "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

The same laws that are being applied to wedding cakes. You would think that after 50 years, the baker would have gotten the message

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

He's just a pathetic little puddle of goo now, isn't he?

Oh my, insulted by a special needs sock, what shall I do?

 

[martybegan]

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

Where is there a constitutional right to a wedding cake?

Where was the constitutional right to be served at a lunch counter?

As I have stated before that was a symptom of law mandated enforced discrimination, both political and economic. It does not compare to a couple having to find another baker for their wedding cake.

And I have a feeling you would approve if this showed a picture of those bakers being covered in crap. You are far closer in ideology to Bull Conner than I am.

It was the beginning of the end for "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

The same laws that are being applied to wedding cakes. You would think that after 50 years, the baker would have gotten the message

it's not the same thing, and you are being lazy trying to equate the two without any backup whatsoever.

 

[BlindBoo]

Has nothing to do with religion. Strictly business.

 

[bodecea]

Lesbians announced what kind of sex they have?

What was it that you thought lesbian meant?

I realize you're just a drone, but really...

Maybe he is a damned good baker. I have about a half dozen bakers within a 5 mile radius. I only patronize one.

Melissa is a she, and she was targeted explicitly to attack the 1st amendment protection of religion. As you know, this wasn't random, but a specific attack. Legal terrorism.

Really now?

You have a first amendment right to discriminate? Don't think so
You can't use your religion as an excuse to discriminate against other people

So a person can be forced to be friends and socialize with people they don't want to?

Was this couple demanding the cake bakers be friends? Is friendship a business, now? Fascinating....perhaps it is....for you. (Just my opinion)

 

[Uncensored2008]

Get rid of PA laws then....work at it. Convince the majority of voters in your state to repeal said laws.

Nah, just return them to their original meaning under common law.

You should stick to trolling. shortbus; you lack the intellect to engage in actual debate.

 

[rightwinger]

Where was the constitutional right to be served at a lunch counter?

There is none.

Unless an action causes immediate harm to another, a free person cannot be compelled to act against their will in a free society.

If you are the only motel in a hundred miles, refusing a room causes direct harm. Refusing a seat at the lunch counter does not.

No need to demonstrate harm which is hard to do. Only that service was denied on the basis of race, religion, national origin or sexual orientation

 

[2aguy]

Nope....the Constitution says it isn't the end of the story...the Constitution says they have freedom to practice their religion without interference by the government....and taking their livelyhood if they try to practice their religion is against the law.......

When baking wedding cakes is what churches do you let us all know? Until then it's a business open to the public, all of the public.

What kind of wedding cakes?

Butt ******* wedding cakes

Seems our fascist friends here want to make them do that......

Yep- we fascists believe a business should follow the law.

We 'fascists' also don't think that Christians get a special dispensation from following the law.

The law says they have freedom to practice their religion.......

 

[bodecea]

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

^ Supports Special Rights for Christians.....of course, it's just his opinion.

if a gay atheist baker didn't want to make a cake for a Fundamentalist Christian wedding, I would be OK with that as well.

Where are the special rights I am proposing?

If they have a business license in a state where Christians are protected in PA laws (hint: all 50 states) it would be illegal for them to do so.....and I would NOT be ok with that.

Why do you feel the need to force people to associate with something they don't want to? Especially in contracted services that can be easily replaced?

Show us where anyone else with a business license gets to make that same argument to get out of serving anyone based on their religion, their race, etc. If you can't show that, you are advocating special rights for this christian couple.

 

[rightwinger]

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

Where is there a constitutional right to a wedding cake?

Where was the constitutional right to be served at a lunch counter?

As I have stated before that was a symptom of law mandated enforced discrimination, both political and economic. It does not compare to a couple having to find another baker for their wedding cake.

And I have a feeling you would approve if this showed a picture of those bakers being covered in crap. You are far closer in ideology to Bull Conner than I am.

It was the beginning of the end for "We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone"

The same laws that are being applied to wedding cakes. You would think that after 50 years, the baker would have gotten the message

it's not the same thing, and you are being lazy trying to equate the two without any backup whatsoever.

It is the same thing...that is why the law was applied

Baker took it to court and the baker lost

 

[bodecea]

When baking wedding cakes is what churches do you let us all know? Until then it's a business open to the public, all of the public.

What kind of wedding cakes?

Butt ******* wedding cakes

Seems our fascist friends here want to make them do that......

Yep- we fascists believe a business should follow the law.

We 'fascists' also don't think that Christians get a special dispensation from following the law.

The law says they have freedom to practice their religion.......

They are worshipping their cakes now? That's creepy.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Was this couple demanding the cake bakers be friends? Is friendship a business, now? Fascinating....perhaps it is....for you. (Just my opinion)

Why did they pick that particular bakery, shortbus?

There were three others within 5 miles.

Yeah, we ALL (maybe even you) know exactly why.

 

[rightwinger]

When baking wedding cakes is what churches do you let us all know? Until then it's a business open to the public, all of the public.

What kind of wedding cakes?

Butt ******* wedding cakes

Seems our fascist friends here want to make them do that......

Yep- we fascists believe a business should follow the law.

We 'fascists' also don't think that Christians get a special dispensation from following the law.

The law says they have freedom to practice their religion.......

Their business doesn't. The business must comply with the regulations of the community

 

[Tom Horn]

For crying out loud!

Stop whining and bake the ******* cake

How about not hassling bakers, stop corn-holing other fruitloops, and find a woman to marry instead?

 

[2aguy]

Was this couple demanding the cake bakers be friends? Is friendship a business, now? Fascinating....perhaps it is....for you. (Just my opinion)

Why did they pick that particular bakery, shortbus?

There were three others within 5 miles.

Yeah, we ALL (maybe even you) know exactly why.

Talk about being hateful........they could easily get their cake made in several other bakeries.......even though these bakers made cakes, cookies, pastries and pies for gays all the time without a problem......they decided that they would destroy this couple.....over a cake.......that is real hate...

 

[2aguy]

What kind of wedding cakes?

Butt ******* wedding cakes

Seems our fascist friends here want to make them do that......

Yep- we fascists believe a business should follow the law.

We 'fascists' also don't think that Christians get a special dispensation from following the law.

The law says they have freedom to practice their religion.......

Their business doesn't. The business must comply with the regulations of the community

Nope...the Bill of Rights doesn't say...if the community allows it......the community must comply with the Bill of Rights..

 

[Tom Horn]

Talk about being hateful........they could easily get their cake made in several other bakeries.......even though these bakers made cakes, cookies, pastries and pies for gays all the time without a problem......they decided that they would destroy this couple.....over a cake.......that is real hate...

It's all about self-loathing and making a spectacle of themselves.

 

[Iceweasel]

The Gaystapo can only harass their enemies by using public accommodation laws passed by leftists. They do it because it isn't a constitutional right.

 

[bodecea]

Get rid of PA laws then....work at it. Convince the majority of voters in your state to repeal said laws.

Nah, just return them to their original meaning under common law.

You should stick to trolling. shortbus; you lack the intellect to engage in actual debate.

And their "original meaning under common law"...? (anyone here remember PA laws being part of common law? )

 

[bodecea]

The Gaystapo can only harass their enemies by using public accommodation laws passed by leftists. They do it because it isn't a constitutional right.

"The Gaystapo"......too funny! The poor, benighted heteros.