Bakers fined for not working homosexual "wedding" continue fighting for their freedoms

[Syriusly]

A baker has no idea what goes on behind closed doors....nor is it any of his business

Then why are lesbians compelled to come in announcing it?

In fact, why do they need to SPECIFICALLY target a Christian baker when 3 others were within 5 miles?

Ah yes, the left's war on civil rights....

Lesbians announced what kind of sex they have?

Maybe he is a damned good baker. I have about a half dozen bakers within a 5 mile radius. I only patronize one.

That must be a hell of a bakery- I have never been in a bakery where anyone announces what kind of sex they have.

 

[Tom Horn]

The Gaystapo can only harass their enemies by using public accommodation laws passed by leftists. They do it because it isn't a constitutional right.

"The Gaystapo"......too funny! The poor, benighted heteros.

I believe knight is still spelled with a "k".

 

[WorldWatcher]

A baker has no idea what goes on behind closed doors....nor is it any of his business

Then why are lesbians compelled to come in announcing it?

In fact, why do they need to SPECIFICALLY target a Christian baker when 3 others were within 5 miles?

Ah yes, the left's war on civil rights....

1. They didn't come in and "announce" it the baker asked who was getting married.

2. They didn't "SPECIFICALLY target" the Christian baker, the bakery had provided the cake a couple of years earlier for the mother (around 2011) and they came across the baker at a bridal show in Portland in late 2013 and expressed a desire to have them make the wedding cake. Due to both the previous cake purchase and bridal show event the emailed for an appointment.


http://www.oregon.gov/boli/SiteAssets/pages/press/Sweet Cakes FO.pdf


>>>>

 

[dblack]

So..why are so many advocating Special Rights for this bakery?

I'm not. I'm advocating protecting these rights for everyone. We should all have the basic right to refuse to serve anyone for any reason.

Then work to get PA laws repealed.

Wow...

 

[Iceweasel]

A baker has no idea what goes on behind closed doors....nor is it any of his business

Then why are lesbians compelled to come in announcing it?

In fact, why do they need to SPECIFICALLY target a Christian baker when 3 others were within 5 miles?

Ah yes, the left's war on civil rights....

1. They didn't come in and "announce" it the baker asked who was getting married.

2. They didn't "SPECIFICALLY target" the Christian baker, the bakery had provided the cake a couple of years earlier for the mother (around 2011) and they came across the baker at a bridal show in Portland in late 2013 and expressed a desire to have them make the wedding cake. Due to both the previous cake purchase and bridal show event the emailed for an appointment.


http://www.oregon.gov/boli/SiteAssets/pages/press/Sweet Cakes FO.pdf


>>>>

So? They are too frail to take no for an answer? Most of us learn that by the time we are 5.

 

[rightwinger]

For crying out loud!

Stop whining and bake the ******* cake

How about not hassling bakers, stop corn-holing other fruitloops, and find a woman to marry instead?

I think she was marrying a woman

 

[WorldWatcher]

A baker has no idea what goes on behind closed doors....nor is it any of his business

Then why are lesbians compelled to come in announcing it?

In fact, why do they need to SPECIFICALLY target a Christian baker when 3 others were within 5 miles?

Ah yes, the left's war on civil rights....

1. They didn't come in and "announce" it the baker asked who was getting married.

2. They didn't "SPECIFICALLY target" the Christian baker, the bakery had provided the cake a couple of years earlier for the mother (around 2011) and they came across the baker at a bridal show in Portland in late 2013 and expressed a desire to have them make the wedding cake. Due to both the previous cake purchase and bridal show event the emailed for an appointment.


http://www.oregon.gov/boli/SiteAssets/pages/press/Sweet Cakes FO.pdf


>>>>

So? They are too frail to take no for an answer? Most of us learn that by the time we are 5.

I was responding to the idea that they waltzed in and "announced" it and that they specifically targeted the bakery. Who knew the insidious bastards would purchase a wedding cake for their mother 2 years prior as part of their diabolical plan to target this bakery and then getting and invite from one of the owners during a bridal show.

Personally I support the repeal of Public Accommodation laws. There is something wrong when a religious baker can refuse service based on the customers being gay but a gay business owner cannot refuse service because of the customers religion. In once case its illegal in about 21 states, on the other it's illegal in all 50 states. Wanna bet which is which?



>>>>

 

[rightwinger]

Butt ******* wedding cakes

Seems our fascist friends here want to make them do that......

Yep- we fascists believe a business should follow the law.

We 'fascists' also don't think that Christians get a special dispensation from following the law.

The law says they have freedom to practice their religion.......

Their business doesn't. The business must comply with the regulations of the community

Nope...the Bill of Rights doesn't say...if the community allows it......the community must comply with the Bill of Rights..

What ever happened to the states rights you guys love so much?
Individual states and counties are enacting laws that best serve their communities. These laws have been found to be Constitutional

 

[Syriusly]

Seems our fascist friends here want to make them do that......

Yep- we fascists believe a business should follow the law.

We 'fascists' also don't think that Christians get a special dispensation from following the law.

The law says they have freedom to practice their religion.......

Their business doesn't. The business must comply with the regulations of the community

Nope...the Bill of Rights doesn't say...if the community allows it......the community must comply with the Bill of Rights..

What ever happened to the states rights you guys love so much?
Individual states and counties are enacting laws that best serve their communities. These laws have been found to be Constitutional

They are pro-states rights just so long as it is convenient.

 

[Iceweasel]

Personally I support the repeal of Public Accommodation laws. There is something wrong when a religious baker can refuse service based on the customers being gay but a gay business owner cannot refuse service because of the customers religion. In once case its illegal in about 21 states, on the other it's illegal in all 50 states. Wanna bet which is which?

Unless the government is going to make your business tax exempt they have no business telling you who you can serve or not.

But homosexuals aren't being denied for being gay, people get confused over that. It's the forcing someone to serve or make a product they find objectionable. That's too USSR for me.

 

[Tom Horn]

I think she was marrying a woman

Good news....two more bra-burning lunatics who will never reproduce.

 

[WorldWatcher]

But homosexuals aren't being denied for being gay, people get confused over that. It's the forcing someone to serve or make a product they find objectionable. That's too USSR for me.

Sure they are. A bakery bakes wedding cakes (among other things), a heterosexual couple comes in and orders a cake. Baker says "no problem". A same-sex couple walks in and says "no way". Same cake. Whats the difference? The gender composition of the couple.


>>>>

 

[WorldWatcher]

Good news....two more bra-burning lunatics who will never reproduce.

You confuse gay with being infertile. Not the same thing.


>>>>

 

[Iceweasel]

But homosexuals aren't being denied for being gay, people get confused over that. It's the forcing someone to serve or make a product they find objectionable. That's too USSR for me.

Sure they are. A bakery bakes wedding cakes (among other things), a heterosexual couple comes in and orders a cake. Baker says "no problem". A same-sex couple walks in and says "no way". Same cake. Whats the difference? The gender composition of the couple.

The difference is it's none of your ******* business. Or the government's, like I just said.

 

[rightwinger]

I think she was marrying a woman

Good news....two more bra-burning lunatics who will never reproduce.

What makes you think they won't reproduce?

 

[Syriusly]

Personally I support the repeal of Public Accommodation laws. There is something wrong when a religious baker can refuse service based on the customers being gay but a gay business owner cannot refuse service because of the customers religion. In once case its illegal in about 21 states, on the other it's illegal in all 50 states. Wanna bet which is which?

Unless the government is going to make your business tax exempt they have no business telling you who you can serve or not.e.

The government has been doing that since 1964. Glad you finally noticed.

 

[Silhouette]

I'll wager that cults based on aberrant or deranged sexual behaviors have been oppressed for a lot longer than that...and always for good reason. Seems those types of cults always wind up seeking children to join after great and sublime efforts...

I honestly don't care what anyone does to get their jollies. None of my business.

I do however support civil rights. Lesbians can do whatever they want to each other. But they can't force others to labor against their will for them. This violates the 1st and 13th amendments.

Keyword: "do", not "are".

When a minority behavior loose-knit group escapes regulation by the majority, then the door has been opened to any minority behavior group escaping regulation by the majority.

The statement "I AM a lesbian" could be called into question if, for example, that lesbian is attracted to masculine qualities in her partner and enjoys sex with a dildo. Then the "AM" part gets really murky. In LGBTQ-lingo if this was happening in the reverse on the other side of the aisle, they'd immediately label that person closeted homosexual. Yes, they would. Definitively and solidly.

 

[Silhouette]

Personally I support the repeal of Public Accommodation laws. There is something wrong when a religious baker can refuse service based on the customers being gay but a gay business owner cannot refuse service because of the customers religion. In once case its illegal in about 21 states, on the other it's illegal in all 50 states. Wanna bet which is which?

Unless the government is going to make your business tax exempt they have no business telling you who you can serve or not.e.

The government has been doing that since 1964. Glad you finally noticed.

I hope you're not referring to the 1964 Civil Rights Act? Because just this year the 7th circuit federal court of appeals found that it does not apply to homosexual behaviors. You have to actually be a race or a specific gender or an organized religion for it to apply. I guess the 7th circuit realized how open-ended the Act could become if they didn't specify that random behaviors don't qualify.

 

[Silhouette]

Good news....two more bra-burning lunatics who will never reproduce.

You confuse gay with being infertile. Not the same thing.


>>>>

Yes, when lesbians aren't occupied being attracted to the butch qualities of their gal-pals and using dildos for sex, they're seeking out real actual males for sperm to have children with.

Weird, that.

 

[g5000]

A baker has no idea what goes on behind closed doors....nor is it any of his business

Then why are lesbians compelled to come in announcing it?

How DARE two people announce they are getting married! The gall!