Bakers fined for not working homosexual "wedding" continue fighting for their freedoms

[deltex1]

History is full of people not happy with their present situation moving. Its only in modern times that moving is considered something for the well off, instead of the destitute or unhappy trying to make a new life for themselves. It's actually what made the US what it is today.

and do you think forcing a baker to bake a cake for their wedding, or forcing a photographer to film their wedding is going to magically remove that animosity.

No, all it does is satisfy your need for vengeance on people you don't like, and it lets you accomplish it without getting your hands dirty.

"Oh, not "I" didn't do anything, GOVERNMENT did it"

Thankfully, our country does not require you to "move" if you are being discriminated against

Our laws stand up for those being oppressed, not the oppressor

Yes, not wanting to bake a cake for you is "oppression".


That is called "1st world problems"

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

How hard was it when you first got the noodle, Rightwanger?

 

[rightwinger]

A baker has no idea what goes on behind closed doors....nor is it any of his business

Then why are lesbians compelled to come in announcing it?

In fact, why do they need to SPECIFICALLY target a Christian baker when 3 others were within 5 miles?

Ah yes, the left's war on civil rights....

Lesbians announced what kind of sex they have?

Maybe he is a damned good baker. I have about a half dozen bakers within a 5 mile radius. I only patronize one.

 

[rightwinger]

Thankfully, our country does not require you to "move" if you are being discriminated against

Our laws stand up for those being oppressed, not the oppressor

Yes, not wanting to bake a cake for you is "oppression".


That is called "1st world problems"

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

How hard was it when you first got the noodle, Rightwanger?

?

 

[Silhouette]

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

I'll wager that cults based on aberrant or deranged sexual behaviors have been oppressed for a lot longer than that...and always for good reason. Seems those types of cults always wind up seeking children to join after great and sublime efforts...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Lesbians announced what kind of sex they have?

What was it that you thought lesbian meant?

I realize you're just a drone, but really...

Maybe he is a damned good baker. I have about a half dozen bakers within a 5 mile radius. I only patronize one.

Melissa is a she, and she was targeted explicitly to attack the 1st amendment protection of religion. As you know, this wasn't random, but a specific attack. Legal terrorism.

 

[Syriusly]

[

Not sure why you are calling Muslims animals but once again- why are you lying?

Stupid and illiterate - yep, you're a democrat.

I have never argued that any Muslim should get special dispensation from following the law- Muslims, Jews and Christians have to follow the same law that atheists follow.

Now- why are you calling Muslim Americans 'animals'?

Horseshit.

LOL- I guess that is the only way you can try to dance away from your lie.

Everyone has to follow the law- Christians, Muslims, Jews, Athiests

Christans dont' get a special dispensation because they are special.

 

[Syriusly]

You poor thing.

You have no civil rights anymore?

Freedom of religion has been revoked, as we see.
.

What Church are you being prevented from attending?
Who is preventing you from praying?

Freedom of religion doesn't mean you get to ignore the law- it doesn't mean you get to beat your kids half to death because the Bible says not to spare the rod.

Freedom of religion does not mean freedom from getting your feelings hurt because you still have to follow the law.

 

[Syriusly]

You poor thing.

You have no civil rights anymore?

Freedom of religion has been revoked, as we see.

What of freedom of speech?.

Who is denying you the right to speak?

Anyone preventing you from going out on a street corner and talking shit about Obama or Clinton or Trump?

Nope.

Remember- freedom of speech- does not mean freedom from criticism- no matter how much you right wing nut jobs want that to mean.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'll wager that cults based on aberrant or deranged sexual behaviors have been oppressed for a lot longer than that...and always for good reason. Seems those types of cults always wind up seeking children to join after great and sublime efforts...

I honestly don't care what anyone does to get their jollies. None of my business.

I do however support civil rights. Lesbians can do whatever they want to each other. But they can't force others to labor against their will for them. This violates the 1st and 13th amendments.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You poor thing.

You have no civil rights anymore?

Freedom of religion has been revoked, as we see.

What of freedom of speech?.

Who is denying you the right to speak?

Anyone preventing you from going out on a street corner and talking shit about Obama or Clinton or Trump?

Nope.

Remember- freedom of speech- does not mean freedom from criticism- no matter how much you right wing nut jobs want that to mean.

Read the ******* post, moron.

 

[Syriusly]

We do have a right to privacy- so the government is not allowed to tell you what kind of sex you can have in private, and can't tell you that you can't use birth control.

That of course has nothing to do with requiring a business to follow business law- and not discriminate against Jews, Christians, Veterans, the handicapped, gays, women, Mexicans, blacks, Muslims.....

Every heard of a 1040, sploogy?

How does that fit with a right to "privacy?" What details of life are NOT demanded by the state?

Further, here is the 4th Amendment - which I doubt you've ever seen before, care to point out where it mentions privacy?

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

In fact, those things it DOES explicitly mention are routinely violated by the government. There is no mention of abortion, which is the ONLY "privacy" to lefitsts. But it DOES speak of papers and effects, which you MUST reveal to the IRS or go to prison.

So let's talk about civil rights, Comrade?

LOL- you poor baby- you have to pay taxes?

2. Sixteenth Amendment. More importantly, in 1909 Congress proposed the Sixteenth Amendment. This amendment reads as follows:

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.[13]

 

[martybegan]

History is full of people not happy with their present situation moving. Its only in modern times that moving is considered something for the well off, instead of the destitute or unhappy trying to make a new life for themselves. It's actually what made the US what it is today.

and do you think forcing a baker to bake a cake for their wedding, or forcing a photographer to film their wedding is going to magically remove that animosity.

No, all it does is satisfy your need for vengeance on people you don't like, and it lets you accomplish it without getting your hands dirty.

"Oh, not "I" didn't do anything, GOVERNMENT did it"

Thankfully, our country does not require you to "move" if you are being discriminated against

Our laws stand up for those being oppressed, not the oppressor

Yes, not wanting to bake a cake for you is "oppression".


That is called "1st world problems"

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

Where is there a constitutional right to a wedding cake?

 

[Syriusly]

A baker has no idea what goes on behind closed doors....nor is it any of his business

Then why are lesbians compelled to come in announcing it?.

They simply ordered a cake- matter of fact it wasn't even the lesbians ordering the cake- it was a young woman with her mom who came in and ordered a wedding cake.

The baker refused when he found out she was marrying another woman. She didn't 'come in announcing it'- she was ordering a cake.

 

[Syriusly]

You poor thing.

You have no civil rights anymore?

Freedom of religion has been revoked, as we see.

What of freedom of speech?.

Who is denying you the right to speak?

Anyone preventing you from going out on a street corner and talking shit about Obama or Clinton or Trump?

Nope.

Remember- freedom of speech- does not mean freedom from criticism- no matter how much you right wing nut jobs want that to mean.

Read the ******* post, moron.

I read your ******* post- and it was ******* stupid but that was to be expected.

Your freedom of speech has not been denied- look here you are whining and whining and whining.

And no one can stop your whining.

 

[Syriusly]

Thankfully, our country does not require you to "move" if you are being discriminated against

Our laws stand up for those being oppressed, not the oppressor

Yes, not wanting to bake a cake for you is "oppression".


That is called "1st world problems"

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

Where is there a constitutional right to a wedding cake?

Nope- nor is there any constitutional right to refuse to sell a wedding cake.

 

[martybegan]

Yes, not wanting to bake a cake for you is "oppression".


That is called "1st world problems"

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

Where is there a constitutional right to a wedding cake?

Nope- nor is there any constitutional right to refuse to sell a wedding cake.

There is a right to free exercise of religion, and thus if you want to override that you have to show a compelling government interest, and an example of actual harm caused by such free exercise. Also you have to override it using the least restrictive method possible.

 

[rightwinger]

Lesbians announced what kind of sex they have?

What was it that you thought lesbian meant?

I realize you're just a drone, but really...

Maybe he is a damned good baker. I have about a half dozen bakers within a 5 mile radius. I only patronize one.

Melissa is a she, and she was targeted explicitly to attack the 1st amendment protection of religion. As you know, this wasn't random, but a specific attack. Legal terrorism.

Really now?

You have a first amendment right to discriminate? Don't think so
You can't use your religion as an excuse to discriminate against other people

 

[rightwinger]

Thankfully, our country does not require you to "move" if you are being discriminated against

Our laws stand up for those being oppressed, not the oppressor

Yes, not wanting to bake a cake for you is "oppression".


That is called "1st world problems"

Being discriminated against is oppression

Gays have been oppressed for centuries. They should know

Being told to go to another baker is not oppression. Once again progressives define things down to suit their needs.

Gays have been oppressed legally for centuries

They are not about to give back their hard fought rights to appease some bigoted baker

Where is there a constitutional right to a wedding cake?

Where was the constitutional right to be served at a lunch counter?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

What Church are you being prevented from attending?
Who is preventing you from praying?

Freedom of religion doesn't mean you get to ignore the law- it doesn't mean you get to beat your kids half to death because the Bible says not to spare the rod.

Freedom of religion does not mean freedom from getting your feelings hurt because you still have to follow the law.

One of the more important tenets of freedom of religion is the prohibition of the state compelling persons to act against their religious beliefs.

For instance, the state cannot legally force one of your Muslim allies to eat pork. Nor could they force a Jew to work in a swine slaughterhouse.

NOR CAN THEY FORCE A CHRISTIAN TO BAKE A CAKE CELEBRATING HOMOSEXUALITY.

Look, you're an anti-liberty leftist, a democrat - you have no understanding of liberty nor the concepts of human rights and dignity, you are a servant of the party, and see only the collective. You cannot grasp what individual rights are.

But this is a nation that was founded on civil rights and individual liberty. Those of use who are not Soros hate drones, cling to concepts such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. You cannot understand, Comrade.

 

[hazlnut]

Christian Bakers Fined For Not Working Gay Wedding Continue Fighting For Their Freedoms

Good for them and the 2nd to last paragraph is spot on!

**** 'em. They can't follow / don't like the laws in our country re: businesses serving the public-- then leave.