Bakers fined for not working homosexual "wedding" continue fighting for their freedoms

The photos from the kitchen of the Sweet Cakes by Melissa bakery are very suspect... :eusa_think:

burly_bakers_650a.jpg
 
"So the court must determine: Has Oregon, for example, compelled Catholics to sculpt totems for Wiccan rituals? Feminists to photograph fraternity initiations? Pro-life filmmakers to video abortions?" the brief asks. "It has not, and that ends the case."

THAT is spot on.
 
As a wedding minister, I find this couple's behavior deplorable.

You got a certificate on the internet?

Here is the "deplorable" basis for their behavior;

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hillary promises she will make these deplorable words null and void.
 
As a wedding minister, I find this couple's behavior deplorable.

You got a certificate on the internet?

Here is the "deplorable" basis for their behavior;

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hillary promises she will make these deplorable words null and void.

:cuckoo:
 
As a wedding minister, I find this couple's behavior deplorable.

You got a certificate on the internet?

Here is the "deplorable" basis for their behavior;

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hillary promises she will make these deplorable words null and void.

:cuckoo:

So these are "crazy" words? :eek:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
 
As a wedding minister, I find this couple's behavior deplorable.

You got a certificate on the internet?

Here is the "deplorable" basis for their behavior;

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Hillary promises she will make these deplorable words null and void.

:cuckoo:

So these are "crazy" words? :eek:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

:booze:
 
"So the court must determine: Has Oregon, for example, compelled Catholics to sculpt totems for Wiccan rituals? Feminists to photograph fraternity initiations? Pro-life filmmakers to video abortions?" the brief asks. "It has not, and that ends the case."

THAT is spot on.
Lol no that was actually the dumbest part of the article. And to think it was a professional saying all that goofy nonsense. Smh.
 
"So the court must determine: Has Oregon, for example, compelled Catholics to sculpt totems for Wiccan rituals? Feminists to photograph fraternity initiations? Pro-life filmmakers to video abortions?" the brief asks. "It has not, and that ends the case."

THAT is spot on.
Lol no that was actually the dumbest part of the article. And to think it was a professional saying all that goofy nonsense. Smh.
Oh please let us hear your BRILLIANT take on this....we know facts hurt stupid people so of course you are whining about it you simply don't comprehend it.
 
If you 'accidently' make 1 nasty cake you will never be asked to do so again...probably.

More simple approach - 'We don't do Weddings'.
 
They broke the law and engaged in discriminatory behavior. Render unto Caesar. However, I still maintain that the best way to deal with these issues is to fully allow people to discriminate against gay couples being married, with the only stipulation being large and conspicuous notices all over your storefronts and websites.
 

Forum List

Back
Top