Background Checks

[Spoonman]

And yet it didnt pass because democratic congressmen opposed it.

4 of them, think if there had been a few more democrats in the pool. it didn't pass because republicans all voted against it. two less republicans would have resulted in a 4 vote swing and it would have gone the other way

Sure, we can play the what if math game and in an alternate reality it might be law! But in this world, it didn't pass

it didn't pass because republicans had a strong enough presence.

 

[AmyNation]

It didnt pass because it wasnt popular with voters.

 

[Spoonman]

It didnt pass because it wasnt popular with voters.

that didn't stop all but 4 democrats voting in favor of it.

 

[AmyNation]

It was popular with lots of people, just not with the majority.

 

[Spoonman]

It was popular with lots of people, just not with the majority.

so i guess in that case the right thing for congress to do would be to drop it.

 

[tjvh]

Are you talking about Obama bucs90?

Not on this thread. But, I dont deny many people, of all political beliefs, have politicized the deaths of cops and soldiers. It is disgusting each and every time. And two wrongs dont make a right.

This thread was started by an idiot trying to use the death of a brave cop to politicize his gun agenda.

But politicizing dead children in Newtown is ok because it was Democrats doing it. What exactly does the term hypocrite mean to you?

 

[AmyNation]

Sure. Or formulate a law that the majority approve of.

 

[paulitician]

This whole Background Check debate is silly. We already have extensive Background Checks. And Criminals do not submit to them. The Anti-2nd Amendment Socialists know that. This is just another attempt to circumvent the Constitution. Take the guns away from criminals. Leave decent law-abiding Citizens alone.