Axing Jimmy Kimmel Is Government Suppression of Political Speech!

[Hollie]

It's easy to believe your level of reading comprehension would equate 'got him fired' with 'fire'.

Home schooled MAGAt, perchance?

You FAGATs just don't want to learn the facts.. ABC canned little Jimmy for good reasons.

Jimmy Kimmel’s ratings were plummeting before ABC suspended him for Charlie Kirk comments

Nielsen data showed sharp summer declines and a year-long slide that leaves him trailing rivals such as Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld and CBS star Stephen Colbert.

nypost.com

 

[AntonToo]

Democrats have no issue with censorship. We've seen this over and over and over again.

I suggest you actually read it.

There is no retaliatory threat there and not even an ask that anyone be fired.

The demand is for FOX news to stop repeating what they themselves admit are lies about 2020 election.

 

[Thinker101]

No he didn't liar. Facebook volatarily warned about Covid-19 misinformation and removed some misinformation dedicated accounts.

There were no explicit threats from the gov of retribution for not co-operating and no regulatory action when Facebook didn't.

You're fricken clueless.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/urls_cited/ot2023/23-411/23-411-2.pdf

Weaponization Committee Exposes the Biden White House Censorship Regime in New Report

 

[AntonToo]

You're fricken clueless.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/urls_cited/ot2023/23-411/23-411-2.pdf

Weaponization Committee Exposes the Biden White House Censorship Regime in New Report

I'm not interested in sifting through partisan piles of bs.

If you have a concise refute of what you've quoted, then go ahead and post it.

 

[Hollie]

MAGA has gone full woke, full cancel culture.

Go figure. It's all just about revenge.

You FAGATs have gone full conspiracy theory mode.

As with Colbert, little Jimmy was a ratings loser and money pit.

 

[buckeye]

There were no explicit threats from the gov of retribution for not co-operating and no regulatory action when Facebook didn't.

Post in thread 'Axing Jimmy Kimmel Is Government Suppression of Political Speech!'

Sep 19, 2025

Zuckerberg DOES NOT disagree and has never claimed any explicit threats.

In a letter to Rep. Jim Jordan, the Republican chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg alleges that the officials, including those from the White House, “repeatedly pressured” Facebook for months to take down “certain COVID-19 content including humor and satire.”

The officials “expressed a lot of frustration” when the company didn’t agree, he said in the letter....

• buckeye

You ignored my post that showed you there were threats to FB from the Biden Administration to censor its users and it was verified by Zuckerberg.

I don't wonder why you ignored it. Two bit liar posters always act like two bit liar posters. You're a waste of time.

 

[Mac-7]

It was under threat of loosing their broadcasting licence...

That has been made clear...

Could you also please tell us what Kimble lied about in his monologue....

Trump suggests 'maybe' pulling licences from TV networks critical of him after Kimmel suspension

ABC suspended Jimmy Kimmel’s talk show after the host mocked Trump’s response to Charlie Kirk’s killing.

www.thejournal.ie

This is not a joke (so don't dispel it as joking), this is very serious...

OR is Kimble allowed to say he was joking, hang on, he is a comedian..

Lied is not the term I would use

Mischaracterized is more like it

I bet there are still libs out there who think the shooter is a MAGA thanks what Kimmel said

Which byw was not against the law

Limmel has become stale and an anchor on the network’s viewership

He was costing them money

 

[buckeye]

I'm not interested in sifting through partisan piles of bs.

If you have a concise refute of what you've quoted then go ahead and post it.

Yet I did provide a concise refute and you ignored it.

You're a liar.

 

[AntonToo]

Post in thread 'Axing Jimmy Kimmel Is Government Suppression of Political Speech!'

Sep 19, 2025

Zuckerberg DOES NOT disagree and has never claimed any explicit threats.

In a letter to Rep. Jim Jordan, the Republican chair of the House Judiciary Committee, Zuckerberg alleges that the officials, including those from the White House, “repeatedly pressured” Facebook for months to take down “certain COVID-19 content including humor and satire.”

The officials “expressed a lot of frustration” when the company didn’t agree, he said in the letter....

• buckeye

You ignored my post that showed you there were threats to FB from the Biden Administration to censor its users and it was verified by Zuckerberg.

I don't wonder why you ignored it. Two bit liar posters always act like two bit liar posters. You're a waste of time.

Dumbass, there is not a single word about any threats.

"Pressured" is Zugerberg's view of White House insisting on co-operation, even though there was never an explicit threat. And he never claimed one.

Consistent with that, THERE WASN'T any action after Facebook refused further co-operation and even removed all misinformation labeling.


I suggest you learn how to read, you are beclowning yourself.

 

[buckeye]

Dumbass, there is no way for Biden administration to censor Facebook users. You are ******* clueless.

Really???? Just how stupid are you?

Biden censored users by pressuring FB to censor its users. FB eventually complied.

 

[22lcidw]

I suggest you actually read it.

There is no retaliatory threat there and not even an ask that anyone be fired.

The damand is for FOX news to stop repeating what they themselves admit are lies about 2020 election.

Progs have tuned us into a banana republic. I wonder when the fisticuffs will happen.

 

[AntonToo]

Really???? Just how stupid are you?

Biden censored users by pressuring FB to censor its users. FB eventually complied.

FB, a private company, co-operated and censored Covid-19 misinformation, without any explicit threat from gov.

Disney/ABC, a private company, co-operated and fired Kimel after an explicit threat of regulatory retaliation by FCC chair.


If you don't see any difference between the two then you are an idiot, there is no two ways about it.

 

[22lcidw]

FB, a private company, co-operated and censored Covid-19 misinformation, without any explicit threat from gov.

ABC a private company, co-operated and fired Kimel after an explicit threat of regulatory retaliation by FCC chair.


If you don't see any difference between the two then you are an idiot, there is no two ways about it.

Progs had no fear for their excesses because the system is controlled by them.

 

[BlindBoo]

LIAR.
1. Trump won the popular vote
2. There was no "insurrection", Nancy Pelosi takes responsibility for J6, ON VIDEO
3. Trump is more popular than the toxic 19% democrats
4. Gerrymandering is needed to keep up with democrats

So you are 0 - 4 LIAR.

Haha. The Don "Corleone" Trump didn't get a majority of votes. No landside of support for his overly broad radical agenda.

Benedict's insurrection was more extensive than the planned riot at the Capitol. The lie that the speaker of the house is responsible for Benedict MAGAMOB's riot that day is laughably stupid.

 

[AntonToo]

2. There was no "insurrection", Nancy Pelosi takes responsibility for J6, ON VIDEO

Wow. Don't even know what to say to a comment so stupid.

Nancy Pelosi said she had responsibility for Congress not being sufficiently defended from the MAGA attack you dummy.

In no way does it refute the fact of the attack on the Congress, which was caused by lies about 2020 election.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Lied is not the term I would use

Mischaracterized is more like it

I bet there are still libs out there who think the shooter is a MAGA thanks what Kimmel said

Which byw was not against the law

Limmel has become stale and an anchor on the network’s viewership

He was costing them money

It's all just damage control by the democraps. One of their transtifa militants just killed Charlie Kirk because of his speech, now they have to flip the story for damage control and say the right is anti-free speech. Last I checked, Kimmel is still perfectly free to say whatever he wants, and Kirk is dead. One of them really did have their free speech trampled on in the most heinous of ways possible. By one of many of these violent democraps. The left is and always has been anti-free speech when it comes to criticism of the left. Let's never let them forget that. Oh, and didn't all the social media companies censure/ban Trump, who was POTUS at the time, for expressing his first amendment right? Hypocrites.

 

[Care4all]

kyzr

And the Sinclair Owned, (hostile take over) syndicated ABC is a Trumper run syndicate, and I can see how it would upset with ABC parent, being that they are locally regurgitating the Trump created b.s. "Radical Left did it" lie that Trump's been pushing and touting non stop 24/7 in the Trumper-sphere...and the Kimmel skit would be saying the opposite.

But no one was making any comment on Charlie Kirk, he was speaking of his assassin....and not just out of the clear blue...

Robinson grew up 19 of his 22 yrs with an entire family, not just his parents, of MAGA and (Mormans)....He likely would not have had his marksmanship without his rifle shooting experience at the gun range since he was 10 as family outings and likely would not have had access to his grandpa's rifle with special scope to make the shot. That's not a lie. It's simply extenuating circumstances, not a reason, by any means! And maybe somehow being gay in an all Morman family was also part of these surrounding things in his life that made him flip out...??

Thus far there is NO EVIDENCE that he was radicalized in to murdering Kirk by some political Radical Left wing group as Trump and Trumpers are lying 24/7 about! Coming out or being gay does not equate with this RADICAL LEFTISTS - rap you are repeating with purposeful MALICE.

I find that made up comment insulting! But I am not calling for the right wing media sphere to fire whoever said it...not asking my govt to censor it for me either.

No one knows why this seemingly stable young man felt murder was the answer....at least not yet.

Something happened to their kid...but there is NO EVIDENCE THUS FAR that he was radicalized by a left wing radical group in to murdering Charlie Kirk....

 

[AntonToo]

Leftard lying again. ^^^

They can't help themselves.

If it's a lie then go ahead and cite the exlicit threat Facebook recieved from the Biden administration.

None of you idiots have, because there wasn't one.

 

[buckeye]

Dumbass, there is not a single word about any threats.

Anton, why do you lie so much about obvious things? One might conclude that the dumbass is really you and all your name calling and lying is because you're so desperately losing an arguement.

"Pressured" is Zugerberg's view of White House insisting on co-operation, even though there was never an explicit threat. And he never claimed one.

Insisting on cooperation? LOL You think that's not pressure??? LOL. You are a dumbass and that is said as a statement of fact, Anton.

He also slammed Biden for asserting that social media companies were directly "killing people" by allowing COVID misinformation to spread. Biden later walked back those remarks. But it was too late, in Zuckerberg's telling. Shortly after the president made that comment, different government agencies started coming after the tech company with "brutal" investigations, Meta's chief said.

There was more than an explicit threat. There was actual retributive behavior from Biden in the form of different government agencies coming after the tech company with brutal investigations.

You can bring a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. I know a whole lot more about you since this interchange. Thank you for that.

Delusions are necessary to be a leftist today. That is a cult.

 

[AntonToo]

Insisting on cooperation? LOL You think that's not pressure?

Moron, what part of EXPLICIT THREAT do you not get?

Not "pressure" as claimed by a guy with vested interest to divert blame for Facebook censorship that pissed off rightwingers.

We are talking about a SPECIFIC THREAT OF RETALIATION, like the one Trump's FCC chair, and Trump himself made.