joaquinmiller
Diamond Member
- Oct 12, 2013
- 6,807
- 7,208
- 2,055
True, but we both know I’m a great deal smarter than you.This isn’t rocket science. I posted two sources that clearly show Russia’s TOTAL COSTS are significantly lower than the Saudis. Can you read or are you too chicken shit to admit you’re wrong?Look jackass. When comparing a nation’s costs, you look at TOTAL COSTS. You don’t just look at production costs. Think. Why be dumb?You don't even understand "production costs". In your budgetary requirement formulation, if the Saudis cancel one F-35 from their order, their production costs go down. If the Crown Prince orders two extra Bentleys, production costs go up.
If I were wrong, I'd admit it. Now, tell me the point of a price war, you yammering fuckstick.
"Production cost' is a term with meaning, and you don't understand it. Why embarrass yourself by ignoring - studiously avoiding - the point of a price war?
And you think you’re an expert. LMFAO. DOOFUS.
And it's a good thing, too, because you're no rocket scientist, elmo.
You're not even smart enough to know the difference between production costs and national needs. If market share goes up, your version of production cost goes out the window.
We both know you're smart enough to avoid admitting the purpose of a price war divorces budgetary needs from the process. If it's so important for you to believe Russia has the upper hand in this, knock yourself out.