- Nov 26, 2011
- 123,586
- 55,363
- 2,290
40% is low enough to give Clinton a record gender gap.Trump would be better served by a low voter turnout. He has more enthusiastic supporters.Anyone who is confident at this point is an idiot.
The numbers and short length of time says it is HRC, despite the scandal.
But, the way this thing is going, she and Donald could be eaten by gigantic golden swans in the next ten minutes.
It will all come down to how well the Democrats do in getting out the vote.
I predicted years ago this election might be the lowest voter turnout in a presidential election since 1924.
I am not as confident in that prediction as I was before. There could be as much enthusiasm for the first female president as there was for the first black president, maybe more.
I think we may see the biggest gender gap in history. Women voters are going to deliver a mighty powerful kick in the nuts to Donald J. Trump.
Trump has the inner Nazi vote, Clinton has the female vote. I guess it all depends which one is more enthusiastic about actually going out and voting.
The difference is the black vote is far more monolithic than the woman vote. You forget Trump still polls in the 40% overall with women, and is in a near time with married white women.
My wife is one of the most conservative, pro-life people you will ever meet. But she is so disgusted with Trump, she is ready to vote for Clinton. I have been doing my level best to convince her to write in a vote for anyone else, but she is positively seething over Trump. He provokes a very powerful visceral negative response in her.
I'm almost positive she is going to vote for Clinton. And she has hated the Clintons for DECADES.
I have decided I am not going to ask her who she voted for. My stomach couldn't take it if she votes for a Clinton.